FLMaster1958 -> RE: Why do Masters NOT fall in love with thier slaves? (6/16/2007 4:04:11 PM)
|
I don't usually post much. But this is a very good question. One I have pondered for a long time. So I will share my thinking, whether anybody agrees or not. I will also take this from a more extreme focus. I believe this goes back to the old questions of being property or a person. As far as I am concerned, you can not own a person. You own propertry. One can give control, but not ownership. Property is owned. A slave is property. I am not trying to judge others. This is my belief and I do not see any other way to see it. When one asks a perspective Master/Mistress if they will love them, there is a certain amount of control they are asking for. This points to the also long running debate between loving and being "in-love". You can love a piece of property. Be a proud owner. A person may own a 4X4. You may drive it around and just show it off. But you paid a lot of money just to look like a rugged 4-wheeler. Or you can take it out into the rough country, bang around with it.. treat it very roughly.. and still be proud of it. Still love it. You can own a dog, and it can serve a purpose (guard dog, watchdog, etc) and that is it. Or you can own it, as a great pet, and love it. So to conclude this part, if you are a very obedient, submissive and loyal slave that Master can use for whatever purpose he desires, he can be very proud of you... and yes, love you. But likely if you are not, he also will not love you. If you ask about this, when first getting together, you are asking if he will love you, without proving your obedience, your submission or your loyalty. Now we talk about being "in-love". This has some very powerful conotations. Usually, when this type of love is mentioned, it creates visions of "if you love me, you will (fill in the blank yourself) or If you love me, you will not (also fill in the blank yourself). This is a power, this is a limitation. You only want and need the slave. If Master/Mistress breaks this vision, by wanting another slave, then trust is threatened. Being "in-love" can very much get in the way of the relationship. Most times being "in -love" leads to marriage. Look at the Marriage statistics. I believe now the divorce rate is over 56%. Ok, I am "in-love" with you and marry you. Now hand you a coin and flip it.. Not only that, but the coin is slightly weighted towards you losing. If the foundation of the relationship is love or being "in -love", then when the slave does not feel "loved" the relationship is in peril. If the relationship is based on trust and true slavery, I do believe the foundation is more firm. If the slave does not feel loved, it does not matter.. it is owned property. The owner may love after all. The slave is there for the owners pleasure, not the slave's. What about "chemistry"? This is a very valid point. Again, let's take it from the more extreme. Think of the slave as meat. Ever get a steak that had the ink inspection stamp embedded in it? I have. Not all slaves are attractive to all Owners. So yes, looks can be important. But do not dispair, it is a very subjective thing. You do not have to be a supermodel. just attractive to him. Attractive enough to bring out his desire to own and use you for his pleasure. Some meat is too tough ( I have had steaks that were near impossible to chew). Is it cooked right? (I have had shoe leather and have them nearly moo when I stuck a fork in.) Is it too soft? Is it flavorless? Is the slave an enjoyable cut that you want to enjoy again and again on a very long term basis? Is the owner one you can trust not to just use and toss? Yes, the chemistry must be right. Now to trust. In my opinion, that is the only real measure to a M/s relationship. But what is meant by that? And what do you trust in? Many look for external symbols to prove that trust. A contract (legally null.. non-binding). A marriage (56% divorce rate and obviously the vows and license here can not be depended on). A person is no better then their word. If you are a slave, do not ask an owner to own you, unless you trust him totally. Trust is also a two way street. An owner trusts you will not run. You will not take his things. You likely have access. You will not get online and look for another. He trusts you take his ownership of you seriously. What do you trust in? If you trust it will be as loving relationship, maybe you are better looking elsewhere. You want someone to love you, not own you. If you trust him to stay within your limitations, maybe you should be a submissive and keep that power unto yourself. Once you give it to an owner, it is his to do what he pleases with. What do you trust in? I believe in the concept of hurt, not harm. He can cause great pain. Even damage (healable damage.) He will not scar or brand unless he feels sure he will keep you and make sure you are valuable to him always. But, if you have to go get stitches often, broken bones, punches., weapons. These are out. Things may happen, does he care? Is he willing to give up your services, just to be able to enjoy the momentary pleasure of breaking a finger? Has it happened, likely will happen again and again. Will he use and toss you away like a used tissue? Or again, keep you and make sure you stay of great value to him. Can an Owner love the slave? Yes. Can an Owner be "in-love" with a slave? Yes. But if this is the foundation of the relationship, maybe you are better looking elsewhere. Ok, let the slings and arrows fly. Any females slaves who believe as I do are encouraged to e-mail me for consideration.
|
|
|
|