Faramir
Posts: 1043
Joined: 2/12/2005 Status: offline
|
colouredin: From all the replies above, you can see a bunch of people have D/s frameworks that incorporate dynamics outside of eros intimacy. I take them at their word, and believe that for some people, that's a workable way. Just so you know, many of us don't feel that way. You likely have a model for D/smuch more like mine. D/s for me is the gateway to intimacy between lovers. I hunger for eros, to see in my beloved's eyes mirrored the same depth of passionately intense love and desire. I use words like intimacy, closeness, and union, and for me to experience that intimacy in eros, vice loves like friendship (phillia) or familiarity love (storge) I need to have a D/s relationship that includes physical intimacy. I can't conceive of a non-intimate (in the way I am using the word) D/s relationship, but that reflects my centering, and I can de-center enough intellectually to understand what other posters are saying.
_____________________________
True masters, true subs and slaves, X many years in the lifestyle, Old Guard this and High Protocol that--it's like a convention of D&D nerds were allowed to have sex once, and they decided to make a religion out of it.
|