juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: welshwmn3 quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania By and large this was a patriarchal society, which valued women based upon birth, ability to produce children, or as servants. Women just were not the equal of men. I know you are talking about a more western european model, but there were civilizations in that time frame where men and women were valued the same. The Mongolian Nation, under Ghengis Khan, for example, had both men and women in their armies (as warriors, the women weren't just around to feed the army) when they went out to conquor the whole world. Yes, once a woman became a mother, she was respected more, and that was due to her procreative abilities. But she wasn't valued ONLY for being a mother. Also, the Norse valued women as highly as men. Most of the household goods was owned by women, including the house itself. If a woman was married and decided to divorce her man, all she had to do was put his personal belongings on the doorstep (and personal belongings meant his clothes, shoes, weapons, everything else was hers). I know there were other cultures where the woman was respected and valued as much as the man (and not just for her ability to tend house and bear children), but I don't know as much about those cultures as I do about Mongolian and Norse/Viking. There are all kinds of different relationship structures all over the world, in addition to some female dominated cultures. I was not about to state that female subjugation is a cultural universal because I just do not believe it is... preaching to the choir here, and I have studied this some.
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|