velvetears
Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006 Status: offline
|
i gave an example as everyone seemed to be demanding one to explain more clearly what the op meant in her first post. i didn't mean for it to become a debate on morals/ethics/ etc about that particular example i gave. A lot of assumptions were made about what i said. i never said i saw them withness scening, they witnessed seeing impact toys and conversation regarding what their parents did. Their parents talked about them being exposed to everything, they were sitting right there when these things were said. This happened 10 years ago, i chose to leave, if it happened tomorrow i would probably handle it quite differently. Also, i wasn't comparing that incident to rape. i was responding to what dark said she basically stated something to the effect everyone should live life the way they feel like. The rape example was in reference to that, to give an example of how we cannot simply live life the way we want, there are boundaries and constraints all around us so we all can live relatively safely. If consent is a huge concern in wiitwd i would ask the question - if these um's were not of the age of consent, and if they and their parents were telling the truth, were the parents consenting for them? If it's acceptable for them to witness events as long as their parents say it's ok why don't fetish clubs have family night, maybe they could even hand out flyers or play computer games in the corner of the club? Heck maybe if they are at least 12 they could set up a movie night and they can watch Secretary? How cool would that be!
_____________________________
Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there
|