Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Topping From the Bottom


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Topping From the Bottom Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:33:27 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline
As i was reading through this thread, i started thinking about my last relationship.  He loved to beat  me and i knew it.  If during the beatings i was crying and squirming, he would continue harder and more severe, i.e. he was getting what he wanted, he loved this reaction.  However, i would eventually get 'lost' (some might call this subspace) and i went completely quiet, still and to another place... at that point he always stopped the beatings.  i finally figured out that if i just laid quietly and still during the beatings, the beatings would not be nearly as severe and he would stop beating.  Was i topping from the bottom because i was not giving him the desired response?  i do not know if i was or not. 

_____________________________

~....and once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you long to return.~ -- Leonardo de Vinci


(in reply to chrisy)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:44:42 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
angelic,

I don't consider 'trained responses' to equate with conscious decisions.  You weren't topping from the bottom, you were learning 'survival skills.'

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 10:09:10 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline
Gads for a minute i thought i was losing my mind.  There are two threads "Topping from the Bottom".  blonde moment!

_____________________________

~....and once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you long to return.~ -- Leonardo de Vinci


(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:26:12 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

quote:

ORIGINAL: chrisy

What, exactly, is topping from the bottom? i suspect i am guilty of this and cannot see a way around it. Is wanting, and enjoying, the challenge of someone very strict setting myself (and them) up for failure?

Try this....
 
A D/s relationship is based on an unequal control dynamic (as opposed to an egalitarian vanilla relationship) where the submissive defers to the will and choices of the dominant partner by mutual agreement.  IE, within your personal relationship, the submissive you does as you're told.
  Sad that many don't get this.
"Topping from the bottom" (tftb) can manifest in many forms - "attitude", brattiness, general disrespect or to outright rebellion etc.  This is generally recognised as the sub taking control of the relationship (even if only for a few seconds at a time) and is definitely NOT how a D/s relationship is designed to function.  Consequently, when the sub does have even a small level of control in this way, usually both Dom/me and sub are miserable for it, esp if it's systemic.

 
To me, a bit of occasional tftb from my girl is quite enjoyable as it allows me to be a reactive Dom as well as my usual proactive.  It's an opportunity to enforce my will over hers; to pull her into line; to remind her of her place etc.  Think about it; I can't very well discipline her etc if she's done nothing wrong.  It's also an opportunity for her to initiate a D/s dynamic, too.  I mean, anytime I'm in the mood, I can just reach over and do whatever I want with/to her whereas a bit of cheek or disrespect can be her way of "inviting attention" beyond the normal avenues of her asking repectfully.  And I toy with her through it; sometimes I might miss some small act of her disrespect altogether (we're all human) but mostly I'll deliberately let it pass just to see what she does with that bit of empowerment - enough rope to "hang" herself, so to speak, before I eventually "drop the hammer" on her.
 
Enough waffling.... lol  To answer your question, it is NOT up to the submissive to control some alleged need to control her "toppiness"!  The dominant has control - or should have - it's *HIS* problem and obligation to control you!  If the sub is doing it all the time (tftb), I'd suggest you're not compatible with the Dom you have, that you need someone a little stricter etc.  By it's very definition, *somone* needs to have control in a D/s relationship and if the Dom/me is unable or unwilling to do so, it's *inevitable* the sub will - and both are rendered miserable.
 
If the Dominant does NOT have control, than he/she is clearly not the Dominant party!

In a perfect World, the only thing a sub gets away with is  what the dominant allows.  If you (the sub) can get away with more or too much, it's the fault of the *dominant*!
 
As always, thank you!!
It is always nice to be reassured that Dominants should be the ones in control.
...chuckling....
Focus!

 
Focus.


< Message edited by MzMia -- 6/23/2007 9:27:18 PM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:29:38 PM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
It's being controlling (usually passively) while giving the appearance of being submissive.  Don't worry too much about it.  If you are guilty of it, whomever you're interacting with is just as guilty of "bottoming from the top", a.k.a. kissing your ass so that you'll play with him or her.   At the end of the day, the dominant party to an interaction has to dominate.  If they don't, complaining that you wouldn't let them because you were "topping from the bottom" is just so much whinning.

< Message edited by Leonidas -- 6/23/2007 9:31:42 PM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to chrisy)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:31:54 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

It's being controlling (usually passively) while giving the appearance of being submissive.  Don't worry too much about it.  If you are guilty of it, whomever you're interacting with is just as guilty of "bottoming from the top", a.k.a. kissing your ass so that you'll play with him or her.


{{{Leonidas}} bottoming from the top, and kissing your ass so
that you'll play with him or her.
A lot of that going around. 

< Message edited by MzMia -- 6/23/2007 9:45:38 PM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 9:39:15 PM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

angelic,

I don't consider 'trained responses' to equate with conscious decisions.  You weren't topping from the bottom, you were learning 'survival skills.'

Stephan


 
I agree with Stephan....    The important thing to consider is that this past relationship was not a consensual BDSM experience.. and that is an important distinction.  Granted.. if we are talking about a consensual BDSM situation... then I can agree that it would be a forum of Dominating from the Bottom.  However.. from what you have shared... your situation was clearly not a consensual BDSM experience.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 10:14:57 PM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

"bottoming from the top", a.k.a. kissing your ass so that you'll play with him or her.  


i never heard that phrase before but i like it, if i ever came across a dom who did that i would be so turned off, i would feel cheated.

_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/23/2007 10:45:58 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: velvetears

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

"bottoming from the top", a.k.a. kissing your ass so that you'll play with him or her.  


i never heard that phrase before but i like it, if i ever came across a dom who did that i would be so turned off, i would feel cheated.

The phrase may be new but how it manifests in practice definitely is not.  Too many submissives put up threads on Forums about their dom seemingly not dominating them at all.  Rather, he'll just kick back and passively accept all the fruits of service that particular submissive has to offer. 
 
My own definition of a healthy D/s dynamic is "A submissive submitting to a Dominant who's dominating her".  "bottoming from the top" is my definition minus the last 3 and arguably 4 words - which means there's no longer an active dynamic.
 
Focus. 

(in reply to velvetears)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/24/2007 10:07:27 AM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
Leonidas and your definition are similar but different - in his the dom actually seems to be chasing the sub and catering to her to get her to be submissive, in yours the dom just sort of lays back and takes the sub for granted - both of those situations would not appeal to me and i agree with you - would totally negate the D/s dynamic. 

_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/24/2007 10:21:02 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline
i am just now reading this response.  Interesting take on it Knight.  i never once considered that i was not in a consentual M/s relationship.  i never once said 'no', in my mind that is/was akin to consenting.  Sheesh i gotta think some more! :)

_____________________________

~....and once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you long to return.~ -- Leonardo de Vinci


(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/24/2007 11:50:50 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

It's being controlling (usually passively) while giving the appearance of being submissive.  Don't worry too much about it.  If you are guilty of it, whomever you're interacting with is just as guilty of "bottoming from the top", a.k.a. kissing your ass so that you'll play with him or her.   At the end of the day, the dominant party to an interaction has to dominate.  If they don't, complaining that you wouldn't let them because you were "topping from the bottom" is just so much whinning.


Preach on, Brotha.

Stephan



_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/24/2007 10:42:19 PM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic

i am just now reading this response.  Interesting take on it Knight.  i never once considered that i was not in a consentual M/s relationship.  i never once said 'no', in my mind that is/was akin to consenting.  Sheesh i gotta think some more! :)


Just because you didn't say No... doesn't mean you said YES...

and that is the big thing about Consent... Saying the "YES" part.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 7:47:10 AM   
CitizenCane


Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic

i am just now reading this response.  Interesting take on it Knight.  i never once considered that i was not in a consentual M/s relationship.  i never once said 'no', in my mind that is/was akin to consenting.  Sheesh i gotta think some more! :)


Just because you didn't say No... doesn't mean you said YES...

and that is the big thing about Consent... Saying the "YES" part.


'Silence implies consent'.  I think it's unwieldy and impractical to define consent in a more active way for most purposes.  Do we need a notarized contract for everything? "Just going along" is a big part of what many submissives do.

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 8:15:27 AM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CitizenCane

'Silence implies consent'.  I think it's unwieldy and impractical to define consent in a more active way for most purposes.  Do we need a notarized contract for everything? "Just going along" is a big part of what many submissives do.



There is more than a few abused women and even men that have remained silent in the face of their abuser....

Since their where silent... should we assume they "Implied Consent" to the abuse theysuffered?  And therefore it wasn't abuse at all.

Yes.. Abusers love to use that LINE... She never said "NO" and I ask.. well did she say "YES".   They love to hid behind "Silence implies Consent". 

You make "Silence Implies Consent" is like some blank check.  I pity any submissive that connects with any Dominant with such a view.

That is not to say that "Silence" can't Imply Consent on occassions.  But using it as an absolute is foolhardy at best.. at worse.. it's can become ABUSE!

Using "Silence" Implies Consent requires responsible consideration for those involved.  Using this type of consent is often preceded by actual verbal communication and gained understanding between the parties involved.   Once a actual communicated understanding is gained... we draw upon the concept of Silence Implies Consent.

You may think it unwieldy to actually have communicated consent at some point... interestingly enough... I think those that have been abused would of appreciated being asked if it was ok to abuse them.



_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to CitizenCane)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 8:21:47 AM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists
Since their where silent... should we assume they "Implied Consent" to the abuse theysuffered?  And therefore it wasn't abuse at all.
........

You may think it unwieldy to actually have communicated consent at some point... interestingly enough... I think those that have been abused would of appreciated being asked if it was ok to abuse them.



From one who was severely emotionally abused...

My silence was consent, only I didn't know it at the time.  In retrospect, after I removed myself from the situation, I had to ask myself, "Why did I allow him to do that to me?"  I had to take my share of ownership so I could forgive myself and begin to move on.

Silent consent to abuse is a form of consent the "victim" (I hate that word) doesn't realize he/she is giving, but it is still consent.  And you know, had he asked my consent at the time, I would have said "yes" because I thought I deserved it, even though I really didn't want it.

Abuse is a complicated subject.  I can only say I understand now why abused people don't leave their situations until serious damage is done, if at all.

But then I think this thread has been derailed, as this has nothing to do with topping from the bottom. :)

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 8:29:23 AM   
KMsAngel


Posts: 17415
Joined: 4/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic

i am just now reading this response. Interesting take on it Knight. i never once considered that i was not in a consentual M/s relationship. i never once said 'no', in my mind that is/was akin to consenting. Sheesh i gotta think some more! :)


Just because you didn't say No... doesn't mean you said YES...

and that is the big thing about Consent... Saying the "YES" part.


now this is an interesting point. granted, I haven't' been on the boards long, but I've never seen this. such a small point in print, but such a large concept in reality.

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 8:31:09 AM   
RaynaSub


Posts: 185
Joined: 9/3/2006
Status: offline
It is the submissives responsibility to learn the character and to trust a Dominant
before she agrees to submit.
If the relationship becomes abusive and she does not leave the abuser, in her silence
she is accepting the abuse.
That is why I feel my submission is a gift, I cherish it and I only give it those I trust and respect.

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 9:12:30 AM   
angelic


Posts: 1807
Joined: 1/24/2005
Status: offline
i realize the thread was way derailed but i had to add this (i never have been good at keeping my mouth, fingers shut). ;)

owned, although you and i have butted heads on many many occassions, what you said here rang very true with me.  i cannot tell you how many times a day i ask myself "why did i allow him  to do that to me".  A very large part of who i am got lost in that relationship.  The 'me', i and everyone around has always known is slowly coming back.  Part of that old me will never come back.   In any event, i very much appreciated what you said.

The issue of consent is still a big part of it.  i allowed it to go on.  i did nothing to stop it and it went on and on until everything fell in on top of me... all his lies, everything.  i cannot point the finger at him and say it is all your fault because i did indeed silently consent by remaining.  i did not remove my consent (in my mind) until i walked away forever.

Ok done. 

_____________________________

~....and once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you long to return.~ -- Leonardo de Vinci


(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Topping From the Bottom - 6/25/2007 1:12:05 PM   
CitizenCane


Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
I don't think this is really derailment- the idea of consent is very connected to the notion of topping from the bottom. If one takes an extremely 'active' perspective on consent, and the submissive must actively verbalize agreement to everything after thorough discussion of the actions involved and their possible consequences, then you do indeed have a situation where the submissive is in pretty complete control of the situation, and I would tend to think of this as 'topping from the bottom'.  If, on the other hand, you accept a D/s dynamic in which dom and sub have a general understanding of their roles, and you have individuals who act with good faith in those roles, then silence is indeed consent, and there is much more scope for an actively dominant process to unfold. 

I believe that a lot of the emphasis on contracts, verbal consent, and so on, is an expression of a lack of trust.  That's a perfectly reasonable stance to have, and for many it grows out of painful experience.  But, however reasonable a stance mistrust is, it seems to me that a major goal of a D/s relationship is to move toward a deeper and deeper state of trust. Part of this comes about from a pattern of responsible behavior by the dom, but it also requires the exercise of trusting behavior by the sub.  Ultimately, the character of the individuals involved is the only real safety for their partners, in D/s or vanilla relationships.  Rules, precautions, etc, are sometimes helpful in the process of leaning about a partner's character, but they can never substitute for good character in the end.

(in reply to angelic)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Topping From the Bottom Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109