perverseangelic
Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004 From: Davis, Ca Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Malkinius She failed at being a slave. She did not beg release. She ran. She did not fail as a human. She failed to live up to her commitment to a Master. She failed herself by doing that. She failed him by running from him. She did the right thing. It doesn't matter that I believe slaves should not be in the situation she was in. That does not change what SHE did. She chose to fail and thereby did what I believe to be the right thing. I don't see that as a failure. Well, in point of fact, I see it as a failure of her owner, and a sucess on her behalf. As I see it, it is one of the foremost duties of someone who is owned to protect themself such that they are a thing worthy of being owned. One is not a failure, even as an owned person, for protecting one's self. I see this as many who have already posted on this forum. Her owner failed in his reponsibility as owner. In failing that responsibility, he violated his contractual ownership of her and ceased to be her owner. That is, in becoming an abuser, he no longer filled the role of "owner" that she had agreed to belong to. He became someone other than the indivual she had given herself to. In other words, while perhaps he felt he owned her in name, by becoming abusive he ceased to be her owner. She owed him no more than anyone would another abuser. Regardless of the intent of saying "she failed as a slave" saying so about something fleeing an abusive realtionship creates a -very- negative stigma on leaving such situations. As I see it, it's already difficult enough to remove onesself from abuse without being told that doing so makes you a "failure as a slave." One CANNOT fail by doing the right thing. For example, if one's owner told one to kill another human being, and one refused, one is NOT a failure as a slave. Yup, disobeyd a dirrect order, but the owner, in asking something so blatantly abusive, has lost his/her right as owner. The second you become an abusive fuck you cease to be an owner and th person you claim to own has no more allegience to you than he/she would to anyone. Of course, this is my opinion. Opinion aside, I think it is still a bad thing to call anyone a failure as a slave for actions such as this. We are constantly told that if we do not give up all that we are we are "not really submissive to our owners." I hate seeing this ideology of surrender even to the degree of great personal harm as being the -only- acceptable method of being owned. I belong to my partner. I also, however, have a duty to protect myself and remain an individual -worth- owning. Behaviors which protect myself should not be seen as "failure." Ever.
_____________________________
~in the begining it is always dark~
|