CitizenCane
Posts: 349
Joined: 3/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aneirin At one time all these labels were unknown,people were just people,we all had little quirks and peculiarities.Because something now has a label,and there something for someone to research,it does not mean people should be treated a whole lot differently.We all should have the ability to be able to relate to others and in a loving relationship,these walls can be climbed. As for a D/s relationship,if it were me who was the 'D' and I encountered someone who had Asperger's syndrome,I for one would disregard that 'disability' and look at that person as more of a challenge.If it was all easy,it would be boring. I have at one time been labelled with AS,but undiagnosed,quite pointless at my age as I have learned to deal with most things.Aware of my inability to look someone in the eye,I have consciously trained myself to do so.Recognising peoples facial expressions has in the past been a problem,but I do have empathy,I can perceive people's feelings,and feelings I trust. The typical AS characteristics are not set in stone and people should not take too much heed of them,but understanding someone is part of the fun. Labels do serve to isolate people,a person once labelled with having a 'disorder',can become detatched from society,leading to other illnesses,depression being one of the more common and the feeling that they are different. To address your last point first- Asperger's is a syndrome, which is only sometimes a disorder. A syndrom is just a description of a collection of characteristics, and while labels may be isolating in some regards, being able to identify a pattern and refer to it can be very helpful both for people with the pattern and people dealing with them. It's unfortunate that some people use labels to dismiss the reality, and the people, behind them, but such people are not dealing deeply with others anyway. Labels can help us avoid reinventing the wheel, grant a quicker path to insight, and lead us to constructive solutions rather than being overwhelmed with incomprehensible data that doesn't fit into our previous experience. I do agree that much of AS is 'not set in stone' (depending on the severity of the individual case). While the syndrome is an expression of a different organization of the brain, the brain is in many respects remarkably plastic, and AS typically grants it's possessors powerful tools for shaping their own minds. What is often lacking is the motivation to make certain kinds of adaptations. Part of this is due to 'blind spots' about certain NT characteristics and their value, and part is a natural reaction to being misunderstood and, from their perspective, mistreated by NTs. Hopefully, if more people are aware of, and understand the meaning behind, labels like Asperger's Syndrome, aspies will experience less social friction and rejection, and have more opportunities to understand what can be gained by making some of these adaptations. That, of course, cuts both ways, as the tendency toward arrogance in aspies doesn't encourage others to understand and accomodate them, either.
|