WillowRain
Posts: 191
Joined: 6/18/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DominantJim I'm curious, how does physicality fit into the decision of a sub finding a master. If it does fit into the equation at all. I mean most relationships are based on emotional and physical attraction but do all subs feel this way to, or are you just looking for a man that can treat you the way you want to or feel you should be treated behind closed doors. Also does size matter? (Note: I'm not making any general statements about my physique or cock size with this question haha) It all depends on what the submissive is looking for and what they like. For me it does matter, but that is because I am a very physical person. I'm not a small person and I am very strong. I work with my hands and my body. Physicality is part of how I live and express myself. Rock hard abbs or some such thing, doesn't matter to me at all, but I do want a D type to be stronger than me. I want them to be able to keep up with me physically. If there is a chance that they will be unable to physically pin me while wrestling and playing, then I'd probably turn them toward a smaller less agressive submissive that doesn't like physical contest. A D type has to be strong, physically aggressive and quick to rough house with me. It's no fun for me if I have to wuss out for a D type to win. I want to be able to full out go into play war mode and still lose, still end up pinned in some ridiculous position with both of us panting and laughing. Physicallity is part of how I feel and experience affection. Rough housing is affection for me. For another submissive it might be all about the internal nature, or about how graceful someone is, or delicate and knowing in their touch. It's all about matching tags when it comes to bdsm, donkey with donkey, ardvark with ardvark. edit to comment on "size": I have some personal preferances, but I'm in no way a size queen. Most men in my somewhat limited experience, fall into a highly workable and good range, the too small/too large group are not that common. It is a lot more about how you use the darn thing, than some arbitrary number on a ruler. Personally, I'm far more excited about a man that is willing and capable of learning how to work and use my body than the particlarities of the actual size of their penis. The whole man has sex with me, not just the one isolated part. If he has the ability to make me squeak like a monkey, and come with consistancy, I will be one happy camper... period. If he is well endowned, but only focuses on his own parts and thinks the totallity of sex is pushing the dang thing in and out of places... well... that's not much fun, or very satisfying. (This is sometimes a private complaint amongst women about fellows who are larger, sometimes they don't take the time to learn a range of skills and are very limited as lovers. They think a big penis is enough to make any woman happy and content, and that just ain't so.)
< Message edited by WillowRain -- 6/30/2007 9:14:02 AM >
|