caitlyn -> RE: political solutions (6/30/2007 2:53:21 PM)
|
This is a fine question. First, allow me to apologize in advance if this post seems all over the board. Lets remove left, right and center from the discussion. At the core, what really matters is how people approach solutions to social problems. There are clearly those that cannot empathize with the plight of others. As someone articulated earlier: If you don't have healthcare (for example), you should have worked harder, etc ... Now, lets not look down on these people ... it may very well be that they value their own personal experiences more than what they might see as conceptual. This is their right, I would think. There are those that seem to value a system where solutions will find themselves, given enough room. This manifests in a attitude that the free market and open competition will be the best solution to any problem, and when you remove competition, or overly regulate it, the baby will be thrown out with the bath water. This point of view can be disputed, or supported. Another group looks to the government to provide solutions to problems, believing perhaps in the evil nature of the open market system, which does at times seem to be dominated by those that know how to abuse it. They don't see fairness in open competition, they see the opportunity for abuse. Again, this can be disputer or supported. Yet another will see a defacto duty of the government, to solve these problems. They take a boat-load of money, they better get off their ass and fix problems. Certain groups look upon these people, as wanting a handout. That may be true in some instances, but in others, these are people that are actually holding the governments fat to the fire ... they are supposed to be providing for the common good, after all. There are probably a ton of other groups, but the point wasn't to sort them all out, as much as to show how different they can be, and yet share a lot of common ground. Uncommonly common, is the notion that when you belong to one group, you tend to see the nafarious in all the others. the immigration reform bill can't be the immigration reform bill ... it has to be the scamnesty bill. The timetable to withdraw from Iraq, can't be a timetable for withdrawl, it has to be the date of surrender. Massive offensive comment: About 99% of people can't debate or discuss ... they can only speak in buzz words. Again, a very good post.
|
|
|
|