CitizenCane -> RE: When Compatibility Changes (7/1/2007 12:00:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveish This thread reminds me of the situation I am in with my sister. Very timely posting, kyra. The only thing that remains the same is change. It is inevitable. Hopefully the changes we experience with are partners are tolerable (or wonderful). In my experience, however, it is difficult to maintain a common goal and grow ~together~ instead of apart. That's just me. Add an additional person in the relationship (in my case a poly relationship) and it becomes even more complicated. Throw in some UM's (four of them) and there is an even great chance for divergence of at least one partner. ~shrug~ It's not something I worry about - I've had two husbands, play friends, boyfriends, other partners, and although very few of them remain in my life I had a ~great~ time, learned a lot, and would not change a thing. We all change. We grow, find new limits, push off old ones, generate new interests, and discover new goals. It is hard to find someone who will let us be ourselves, encourage it, even in the face of being "left behind". Life would be great if it were a fairy tale but it's all we've got to work with. My only advice is to embrace change, accept oneself, tread lightly, and if a split is inevitable, do it with love, grace, and gratitude. An admirable outlook. Are you sure you aren't a Taoist? I will say that there are 'realities' of life that relate to economics, survival, aging, children, and so on that do tend to urge the desirability of sustaining partnerships on us. Putting aside for the moment the question of the role of emotional attachment in D/s relationships, it's a fact that we live in a world in which relatively few people have the economic power to have a secure and completely independent existence. Most of us do depend, if not for our bare survival, at least for many of the comforts and conveniences of life, on sharing 'benefits' with others that cannot be easily or sensibly placed in the context of economic exchange. Loss of a partner can have devastating consequences on the other(s) that have nothing to do with emotional dependency. This is one reason that I view 'the relationship' as an entity in itself, rather than just the intersection of two people's interests. Placing value on the relationship itself helps people grow and change in compatible ways (always assuming, of course, that both (all) parties invest in this perspective).
|
|
|
|