SubinMaine -> RE: Whilst you are fast asleep in your bed... (7/2/2007 1:25:52 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs Yes, I understand that by virtue of only women being able to get pregnant, they are somewhat protected under the gender portion of protected classes. But is that enough to successfully win a lawsuit? No, not in my opinion and apparently in the lawyers opinion that they consulted. Could she file some pointless EEOC claim? sure, because I'm sure she's got tons of time to waste on that. C~ Wildfleurs, you're 100% correct and that last paragraph is essentially what i got from your original post. Too many people focus on the written laws and, well, they're not always used for their intended purpose. my case in point. While i knew it'd be a pointless, rewardless, long and expensive battle in the courts, i wasn't so complacent that i didn't file with the EEOC, because i *did*...and my former company was notified by the EEOC that the claim was filed and noted on record. i believe it all worked out for the better for me mentally and physically. And hind sight is 20/20...had i known the options available to me for HELP when i lost my job, i never would have signed the disclaimer and maybe, just maybe, a lawyer would have taken the case, but that's neither here nor there. Again, it just bugs me that someone who's so obviously not hit the hard times in their young lives can make such a broad generalization on work, obtaining work, keeping work and so on. It's laughable that there are some people out their with that viewpoint, even worse, it's downright SCARY that they're out there.
|
|
|
|