Faramir
Posts: 1043
Joined: 2/12/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Archer That way when something comes up and the slave has to use their judgement they can fall back on the stated values as a guide for their actions when specifics are not available at that moment. Just a really basic idea that may help you in the area of formating your rules based on something real, your Values. In Leather Archer I'd like to second that. I don't use the same articulation, but I am down with the concept. In the Marine Corps we call it "Commander's Intent." If I say, "Lt, take your platoon and assault the enemy on Hill 123," that's all good if Lt. So and So gets to Jill 123 and the enemy is there waiting to be assaulted. WHat if they have displaced to hill 456 down the road? Should the Lt pursue them? Hold the now empty ground? The Lt in question did not get enough guidance from his senior to know what to do (ps if your response is "Call on the radio for further instructions," - the radio is dead ) Now, if I as a commander say, "It is my intent to destroy all enemy forces in our Areo of Operations - go assault the enemy on Hill 123," well then our fearless Lt can now make a call, because he knows the Commander's Intent. Sure, this is a military example, using military language, but I think the principle can be applied in PE.
|