Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
lam
that is one of those things where i saw the article saved it and put it in the archives. Now i may have it wrong and then again i may not. much like your global warming threads i know you have it wrong but you feel your scientist are better than mine and welcome to the world of "difference of opinion".
This was never intended to be racial, you can thank kitten for putting that label on it and now you add to the mix.
It would seem people who make claims about critisism would be quite correct based on your post here, considering the request you made.
My question to kitten was if she felt that we should have looked into bushes background before he ran for office. That was the main thrust of what i asked her several times. Of course i expect most responsible citizens would feel we should have known. She smartly avoided the question and i am sure will continue to avoid the question because she knows exactly what my point is. i am not jewish and even "I" want to know because i do not want those kinds of people as a janitor much less in office of this country. Then it goes without saying that we should know who controls the media as well since most americans know the news is filterd and cleaned prior to putting it up on the networks.
It is a problem much discussed in many homes. i would venture to say virtually all homes in America. Of course you would not be saying to much if we were talking about arabs now would you? After all they are the enemy so its ok to talk about them. right?
Your statements carry no more credibility than you wish to place on mine without some kind of reference cite to back it up. i do have the article showing where the man was arrested handy, it is in my archives, but he was arrested for dissenting claiming that 6 million jews were NOT killed in the holocaust. If i run across it i will be happy to post it.
Meantime why are you trying to block this? Why do you infer my question to you was racist? Why do you wish to block citicism? Shall we change the subject to saudis now (in which you have NEVER pulled the race card in any discussion i have read or yours to date?)
when posting specific names of the owners in the industry i am accused of being a name poster for shame, and using the term generically then its to broad and racial. Seems like your gang has the candle burning from both sides so i guess everyone better just shut up about anything to do with it because the only thing what will not come under the racism card is silence.
i think the real problem here is how does one discuss anythign along these lines that will satisfy the "supposedly" and rest assuredly "agendaless" politically correct? or shall i say those who push for it above all else.
if i had my own race or culture and myself all my buddies owned or have a controlling share or were managers and editors of the media that gets dumped on 300 million people and it was filtered like it is you would NEVER point the finger at the major players or owners and or operators would you? you would brush the whole problem under the table in the name of political correctness as you want here. you would never ask yourself the question if i had a possible agenda and then start comparing the the things that are filtered to who is on control. you would never do that would you? it might be politically incorrect.
you have made your case about germany and no where have you shown it to be founded in anything beyond your opinion.
lam i am really tired of having to get my news from sites everywhere in the world but the us oa. did it ever occur to you that just MAYBE that is the threust of my point or are you more concerned with censorship?
no where have i racially bashed anyone and i was accused of it where i have not even made a comment on any of this but between you and kitten i am fast forming a few.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster
How are the German laws against denying the Holocaust--which you've misrepresented, by the way--the same thing as shielding Jews from criticism? It's possible to criticize Jews without denying the Holocaust. If there were a German law that said something like "If you criticize a Jew, you'll go to jail," then you might have a point. But there is no such German law. All this stuff exists in your head.
Mods, really, hasn't this gone on long enough? There is no law against anti-Semitism in America, but how and when did Collarme become the place to discuss crackpot racial theories? This is asinine.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster
I stopped reading right there. If you believe Jews are "routinely shielded from criticism," you're in your own reality, and I can't converse with someone who doesn't live in the same world that I do.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
That is to say that Jews are routinely shielded from criticism, or that criticism never gets out. Why is that ?
i dont want to bud into a difference between you and terminator, but what would you call gernamy making a law that says no one can contest the jewish death toll from ww2?
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 7/25/2007 7:26:12 AM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
RE: Israeli radio re: America - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread