Lordandmaster
Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004 Status: offline
|
Who determines what is "fact"? If someone believes that 2+3=4, then OK, I agree with you, they are in fact wrong. But most beliefs are more complex than that, and cannot be refuted by facts. Some people believe in God. What "facts" are you going to use to argue with them? Some people believe in one kind of political system; other people believe in another kind of political system. Those kinds of disagreements can't be resolved by appealing to "facts." (Besides, there's some pot-calling-the-kettle-black here: The translation you have in your sig line is in fact wrong, and you yourself got mighty defensive when I tried to point that fact out to you.) The major misapprehension, I think, is that people on here think they can (and should) try to convince each other of their opinion. That's why they get so defensive when people challenge them, and that's why they keep on arguing with people whom they're never going to convince. Every once in a while someone has an opinion that I find interesting, and every once in a while someone even manages to convince me of their opinion. But usually that doesn't happen, and I don't think I'm more or less stubborn than the average. People are just people; they all have their own opinions; and they can get along if they drop the silly premise that everyone else has to agree with them. Lam quote:
ORIGINAL: anthrosub If a person believes he or she is right, then from their perspective (their "inner reality")...they are...even if in fact they are wrong. Everyone knows it but them and this is what's frustrating.
|