RE: Disposable subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


AAkasha -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 9:27:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


I must say you read like something out of cosmopolitan. While trying to say a D/S relationship can be soulful and connecting, you still nonetheless describe it as transactional and conditional.

In my relationship, neither one of us views it as an investment of time, we view it as a bonding experience. If its not bonding, its not going to last.

Bonding is not a by-the-numbers process either (do this, pay attention to that, etc. -- aka a Cosmo formula), no I think its an organic process that is intuitive and native to the individuals involved.

As I see it, if you as guy realize after time that a woman doesn't really care or value you --- you should walk out. Her bonding to you should not be a conditional process, rather it should be a purely personal, individual melding of her soul to yours.


It's funny you say that.  The main context of my OP was that submissives were the ones that felt "disposable," not that femdoms viewed them as disposable. Now that I reflect a little, it seems the better way to sum it is up as "garbage in, garbage out."  But I have read that some submissives feel that they are fighting a losing battle, since they are so easily replaced.  That seemed odd to me.  Or, that femdoms in any way held that over a guy's head, in a literal sense, ie, "Well if you dont' like it, leave. Submissive #72281 is waiting to take your place."

Akasha




cloudboy -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 10:21:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

It's funny you say that. The main context of my OP was that submissives were the ones that felt "disposable," not that femdoms viewed them as disposable. Now that I reflect a little, it seems the better way to sum it is up as "garbage in, garbage out." But I have read that some submissives feel that they are fighting a losing battle, since they are so easily replaced. That seemed odd to me. Or, that femdoms in any way held that over a guy's head, in a literal sense, ie, "Well if you dont' like it, leave. Submissive #72281 is waiting to take your place."

Akasha



My wife and I are in a polyesque arrangement. She has settled down with a secondary partner who is into DOM kink. Anyway, in her quest to find an extra marital relationship, she found getting male attention to be easy, like shooting fish in a barrel. But, finding guys who were height weigh proportionate, smart, thoughtful, and attractive was another story altogether. Then, finding a guy with those qualities with whom she could bond was yet another hurdle.

So, even though she found her guy in a "shooting fish in a barrel" arena, the guy she's connected with is entirely irreplacable. He's one of a kind.

As for my own experience in S&M, I have had it the connected way (in a close relationship) and in less connected ways. I don't think its all that easy for a complex woman to readily go out and find a man with whom she can have S&M in a connected, meaningful way. On the other hand, its probably easy for her to find a ready group of eager play partners.

So, in my view, a Domme could never replace a beloved, soulmate figure, or cherished other with a play partner. Hence, none of the former are disposible.





interestingtimes -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 11:17:16 PM)

You say the smartest things "smiles" the domme thats considering me isn't into pain and neither am I perse..but what you write opens windows in my soul, mines a long way away and an investment for her and I...
Thank you for thoughtfull posts i love your work...




interestingtimes -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 11:30:20 PM)

Not me, im lucky enough to be considered so ill treat my domme with respect, it's not easy to find someone i can click with..Ill move the world if she asks me to "smiles"




SDFemDom4cuck -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 11:33:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

It's funny you say that. The main context of my OP was that submissives were the ones that felt "disposable," not that femdoms viewed them as disposable. Now that I reflect a little, it seems the better way to sum it is up as "garbage in, garbage out." But I have read that some submissives feel that they are fighting a losing battle, since they are so easily replaced. That seemed odd to me. Or, that femdoms in any way held that over a guy's head, in a literal sense, ie, "Well if you dont' like it, leave. Submissive #72281 is waiting to take your place."

Akasha



My wife and I are in a polyesque arrangement. She has settled down with a secondary partner who is into DOM kink. Anyway, in her quest to find an extra marital relationship, she found getting male attention to be easy, like shooting fish in a barrel. But, finding guys who were height weigh proportionate, smart, thoughtful, and attractive was another story altogether. Then, finding a guy with those qualities with whom she could bond was yet another hurdle.

So, even though she found her guy in a "shooting fish in a barrel" arena, the guy she's connected with is entirely irreplacable. He's one of a kind.

As for my own experience in S&M, I have had it the connected way (in a close relationship) and in less connected ways. I don't think its all that easy for a complex woman to readily go out and find a man with whom she can have S&M in a connected, meaningful way. On the other hand, its probably easy for her to find a ready group of eager play partners.

So, in my view, a Domme could never replace a beloved, soulmate figure, or cherished other with a play partner. Hence, none of the former are disposible.



[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif]

Cloudboy...you just said it all right there. I bolded the parts that hit the nail on the head in particular and resonated with Me. Beautifully said!




Wickad -> RE: Disposable subs (7/30/2007 11:52:07 PM)

(quick reply)

I have found that some men do complain about feeling easily replaced.  That being said, some men are easily replaced - lol.

I'm speaking about the 'do-me-do-me' type who just don't seem to want to take the time to get to know a Dominant woman.  If what a Dominant is seeking is quick play and very little personal exploration then .. of course there is no reason to be worried about what the submissive wants as he isn't really worried about what they want.

I don't really want this type of interaction so I tend to play very little and meet very few folks (could also be because I live in Saskatchewan - lol).

On the other hand, there does have to be a line in the sand (so to speak) where the Dominant is in control and if the submissive doesn't like it .. well, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.  To exist in a state of constantantly re-negotiating the boundries of the relationship because the submissive partner doesn't want to do the dishes all the time or obey as required or etc simply does not allow for the dominant partner to really be Dominant.  This is a D/s relationship after all and both parties have puportedly agreed to the roles they expect each other to take on. 

Sometimes the hardest thing to do is be true to the agreed upon dynamic.  The choice comes down to a D/s relationship or a vanilla relationship with a kinky twist.  I'm not suggesting it's easy, and it sure as hell does hurt, but ... sometimes the best choice, even in an established relationship, is to end it ( be it just the D/s or the entire relationship).

Wickad

PS - for the submissive folks out there - sometimes the choices Dominants make are not easy and often we cry a lot in private about those decisions.




steviemichael -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 12:38:02 AM)

 Disposable submission  gosh i wish this was the case most D/Ms want a submissive male to fit into the  "I want a sub that will do this and do that "typical stereotype little subbie that only exist in internet chat rooms and the virtual world of disneyland and use words like commitment  and trust whatever happend too wam bam thank you Mam !!




MisPandora -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 1:05:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: preysub

I like many submissives feel like we are disposable some times because some people can be so rude and bossy instead of Dominant . Its understandable that we do not match everyone and that there is a need for Dommes to sort wheat fron chaff ,However i some time wonder how much wheat is waisted because no patients is shown to the hungey subs . I mean hungry ,in the sence of hungry to serve and please and as a result we tend to be a little keen or even impatient for establish some contact od discussion with a potential Domme .

On the subject of time invested in discussion etc well i agree ,this time needs to be used wisely. But even that is a two way street in that a Domme should in my view interview the sub to establish if there is any real likely match ,instead of waiting endless discussions on nothing and small talk and disappearing after 5 minutes not to return for a week .

preysub

I respectfully disagree.  If you resided on our side of the fence, you'd perhaps see my point, so allow me to illustrate.

A domina like me who has established herself knows to put forth a profile that details out exactly what we seek.  It's got to be spelled out for folks to understand it since everyone's definitions of things are so variable.

Now, if a fellow wishes to gain the attention of and impress a domina, he should put his best foot forward, right?
He should pay mind to the specific things the woman he's approaching is seeking, right?  Or should he just through caution to the wind, to hell with what she wants, leave his blinders on and just blurt out what he wants?

Here is a synopsis of the 5 emails I received yesterday.  (I wish I were kidding.)
1) Hi, I know you're looking for a single guy, but I'm married and experienced. 
2) I am in Greece.  I know you want someone in the US, but we can have a cyber relationship.
3) I'm 66.  I know I'm too old for you, but can't I just come for a spanking?
4) I'm in town on business tomorrow and would like to schedule a session.
5) "OMG your awasom"  (That's a direct quote.)

None of these applicants are interested in being pleasing to me.  They're looking for gratification, and it doesn't seem to matter who pays the price for it.

What I'm getting a sense of that you're trying to say that a domina is somehow obligated to expend more energy beyond the wasted moments that I expended in reading these mails and clicking the delete button?  How did my dominance and interest in finding a submissive mate turn into an international civic obligation to teach all of these ninnies how to read, how to think like an adult human, how not to disrespect another human's time, and how to not sound like an illiterate, self-important jackass in an email to a stranger?  Come on!  It's not my responsibility to train the world. 

This isn't being "impatient" with someone who needs work.  There's no interview needed.  I don't need to discuss matters further.  I can't even bother to respond to most of this!  This is simply drawing a line and using something called selectivity.  If a gentleman doesn't have the good sense nor manners to communicate with another human being at his age, he's not going to get it as result of serving....me or anyone else.

You just don't understand the other side of it.  If you did, you'd be truly disgusted at what your brother "submissives" do.




pollux -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 5:05:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisPandora

You just don't understand the other side of it.  If you did, you'd be truly disgusted at what your brother "submissives" do.


MisPandora,

I get where you're coming from.  This subject usually ends up with both sides talking past each other.

I think one of the reasons threads like this often get some men riled up is that for most of the guys *here* (i.e., on the message boards), we'd just assume saw our own arms off as send a cock pic (or whatever the unacceptable behavior du jour is).  We've been here, read the posts, etc....we get it. 

I think some guys feel like they're playing by the rules, but they're still not getting anywhere, and they're frustrated.  And yes, the numbers game means that many of them are "disposable" (caveats about no one really being disposable apply), at least in the early stages.  Sad, but true. 

Plus, you have the fact that there are a lot of (ethical, btw) pros here, and a lot of opportunistic women, and a few women who are not really looking to cultivate much of a relationship but just snare someone so they can use them and get off, and yes...it's an environment in which it's easy to feel disposable. 

Not to mention that often in femdom play the whole point (!) is to objectify the male -- relating him to a role where he's merely "useful".  And what do you do when something isn't useful?  You throw it away, right?  That's the 800-lb gorilla in this discussion, IMO.  Part of me wants to respond to men who don't want to feel disposable, with, well get out of a subculture -- at least in its fantasy aspect -- which treats you as a disposable plaything.  But they don't want to get out of it, because that's HOT!  [:D]

Another driver for this is the fact that most sub men don't have the luxury to be able to wait around for an exact match with their interests, location, personality, physical qualities, etc. A.k.a., "a picky sub is a lonely sub".  It's a different marketplace for them -- so what you are seeing in a lot of cases (IMO) are men who are trying to "stretch" to accomodate themselves to the reality of scarcity.

Another factor -- yes, I'll say it -- is that unfortunately our scene/subculture draws a lot of profoundly dysfunctional people into it.  It's politically incorrect,  and my evidence is anecdotal, but I don't think a lot of people would disagree with that.

You mix all that up and you've got trouble.







hardbodysub -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 5:38:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DianeB269

A disposable sub is what I look for now. (when I'm looking)


Diane



Works for me!




MisPandora -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 7:45:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
Not to mention that often in femdom play the whole point (!) is to objectify the male -- relating him to a role where he's merely "useful".  And what do you do when something isn't useful?  You throw it away, right?  That's the 800-lb gorilla in this discussion, IMO.  Part of me wants to respond to men who don't want to feel disposable, with, well get out of a subculture -- at least in its fantasy aspect -- which treats you as a disposable plaything.  But they don't want to get out of it, because that's HOT!  [:D]


Absolutely brilliant point that not many have touched on.  I think cultivating that perception as a mindfuck for an owned slave that s/he can be bought, sold or traded and is valuable property IS a useful modicum of mental control.  Vi Johnson writes in To Love, to Obey, to Serve: Diary of an Old Guard Slave (http://www.amazon.com/Love-Obey-Serve-Diary-Guard/dp/0964596024) that Ms Carter had offers for Vi's sale, and one day during a visit by a wealthy dominant friend of theirs, showed her a briefcase of cash said to contain $100,000.  Ms. Carter repeatedly turned the offer down, but made sure the point was driven home that at any time, and at any whim, that could happen.




bschwimmer -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 8:01:27 AM)

Can disposable subs be recycled?




MasterFireMaam -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 8:27:00 AM)

Sub are only disposable if they make themselves such. If they find that they are constantly being accepted for service then quickly released, my guess is there are two things happening. 1) The sub is choosing poorly. They're probably choosing what they fantasize about and not what they need in order to have a long-term fulfilling relationship. 2) The sub is, most likely inconcsiously, sabotauging the relationship. In either case, they need to work to improve their self awareness.

On the flip side, there are some Dominants who do the same...and thus can't find any that fit them longer than a few weeks.

Master Fire




MamaDomme -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 9:37:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam

Sub are only disposable if they make themselves such. If they find that they are constantly being accepted for service then quickly released, my guess is there are two things happening. 1) The sub is choosing poorly. They're probably choosing what they fantasize about and not what they need in order to have a long-term fulfilling relationship. 2) The sub is, most likely inconcsiously, sabotauging the relationship. In either case, they need to work to improve their self awareness.

On the flip side, there are some Dominants who do the same...and thus can't find any that fit them longer than a few weeks.

Master Fire



Ah Ha!  Once again, MasterFireMaam you have spoken the words that were already formed in my mind!

I do not search for a disposable sub, however, they do seem to petition me.  I only 'dispose' of those that are not interested in cultivating something more intense or serious.




MisPandora -> RE: Disposable subs (7/31/2007 2:00:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: steviemichael

Disposable submission  gosh i wish this was the case most D/Ms want a submissive male to fit into the  "I want a sub that will do this and do that "typical stereotype little subbie that only exist in internet chat rooms and the virtual world of disneyland and use words like commitment  and trust whatever happend too wam bam thank you Mam !!

I'm not sure that any of us were referring to online "relationships" or encounters.  I'm almost positive that Akasha was writing in terms of RT D/s.




chuckra -> RE: Disposable subs (8/1/2007 2:21:43 PM)

To me, the thought of either a submissive or a Mistress as being "disposable" degenerates the entire beauty of a D/s relationship. Exploring the compatibility of Aanother is acceptable, but the mind set of "disposing of Him/Hher" removes the potential of growing as people for Bboth.




MsCfromMelbourne -> RE: Disposable subs (8/2/2007 1:13:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Femdoms, do you consider submissives disposable? At what point, and why, does a submissive become non-disposable?

I am very interested to hear what other femdoms think of disposable subs - at what point are you vested in them?  Do you feel great loss when you have to give up on them?  Are they a dime a dozen in your opinion?

Akasha


Few comments:

1    I prefer the expression "casual" to "disposable".  Not every encounter has to be the great D/s Love of Your Life.  Some submissives are just great fun, but will never be life partner material.  No-one gets hurt (usually) if expectations are clear

2   It is not time or service that makes it hard to "dispose" of a sub, it is the emotional bond you have with him.  That can happen quickly or slowly.

3    Kinky men looking for free service are a dime a dozen.  True submissives are as rare as true Dominas IME.  If you are lucky enough to find one, you would not throw him away lightly

4   Having said that, you might threaten to throw him away a lot!  The reason is that it takes the effort of 2 people to make a relationship work but only one to end it.  Therefore, the person with all the power in a relationship is not the Dominant or the submissive, it is the partner who is more willing to end the relationship

5    If a Domina is more committed to her sub than he is to her (so he is more likely to leave), she would be disempowered.  Therefore Dominas often pretend they can replace a sub any time they like (without shedding a tear!) as a sneaky technique to seize and hold the power in the relationship.

6   Of course, these tactics do not create stable and secure relationships.  The rigid "my way or the highway" style of conflict resolution is great in erotic fantasy - but fatal to long term mutually healthy relationships.







BoiJen -> RE: Disposable subs (8/2/2007 1:26:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

Femdoms, do you consider submissives disposable? At what point, and why, does a submissive become non-disposable?

I was thinking about this in response to a couple of threads ongoing and recent.  Some submissives have talked about how they feel defeated out of the gate because really, all a femdom has to say is "my way or the highway," because there are a hundred more subs lined up out her door waiting for a shot.  Others have talked about bdsm relationships being shallow, because a sub must obey or be tossed.  I thought about all this, and while I can see it may look that way, to me there's a deeper situation.

I think submissives are absolutely disposable upon first contact, of course.  Because they are just one of many. But from that point on, the clock is ticking, and any time a woman spends during this process is an investment. The larger the investment, the less disposable he becomes. To me, this is fairly straightforward.   For a submissive to assume otherwise, he devalues her time.  He thinks it's easy for her to just blow him off after spending 10, 15, or 100 hours working on him (whether that be emails, coffee, phone calls or play - it's all time, and time is a finite resource).

How does a submissive become less disposable?  Bank that time, and make it valuable to her.  Time well spent is a better investment.  And here's the key: Spend that time working on her hot buttons, not your own.  Or, focus the attention on her, not you.  That does not mean "how would you like to beat me today Miss" (even though you do not know her), it's effort to understand her as a woman, a friend, and a potential partner.  Find out how she ticks.   To stand out from the other submissives, really figure out how to touch her.

I think that's what it comes down to -- that the time invested is valuable to both people.  It's not as exciting and erotic to have that time invested be on learning her brain, her wiring, her joys and her fears; but it will endear you to her and make you less disposable.   The fun, saucy stuff comes as a byproduct of that.

That's just my opinion - I am very interested to hear what other femdoms think of disposable subs - at what point are you vested in them?  Do you feel great loss when you have to give up on them?  Are they a dime a dozen in your opinion?

Akasha


It's funny cuz I had this conversation with the Lady in Charge not too long ago...so here's a boi's opinion about it...

We're all replaceable. Disposable yes. Less attached to sure. But people...no matter what their station in life are not disposable. We all are replacable. Look at how quickly Burger King replaces employees everyday or how quickly people rotate partners. It's the same thing...sorta. same principle at least. You may not get someone with the exact same talents and abilities or likes and silikes but that person is replacable. Just like everbody else.

I know all the time there's someone out there who can do better than me...so I bust my ass to do it (everything) as best I can. And in doing so I create a value in Her eyes. Effort counts for something.

And that's it from a boi who can't shut up




undergroundsea -> RE: Disposable subs (8/2/2007 6:07:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsCfromMelbourne

Few comments:


Insightful comments.

Cheers,

Sea




LadyClaudiaVan -> RE: Disposable subs (8/2/2007 6:55:51 PM)

Anyone is disposable -> if they suck. [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.201172E-02