Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 2:40:38 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
I am starting to think this is all a word game. Perhaps I'll start a thread in Polls..... "Do You Know The Difference Between An Engine And A Motor. There is a quantifiable difference, but it is not easily described.

So let's just do what the politically correct do, change the words. But to do this logically, we have to examine the facts. There can be no human race, there is no such thing. We are a species.

Speaking of words, the singular of species is species. Specie means something totally different. (it means money)

We humans cannot be a race, the human race cannot mate with other species. Therefore it is a species.

So then we have the Asians, etc., and they are not the same as everyone else. Noone in their right mind can deny that. But we Polacks can mate with them so therefore we must be the same species. But can we Polacks mate with a Rhesus monkey ? Can we mate with dogs and cats ? No.

So perhaps I am not really a racist or racialist, I guess I might be called an ethnicist. So we are not of a certain race we are of a certain ethnicity.

Or we could take the other route, I am a breedist.

Yes, no races just breeds of a species, like dogs.

You shouldn't get me started like this kittensol. Would you prefer the word breed or ethnicity ? Because the concept is real for sure. You just can't ignore facts, there are differences. If you ignore facts you are ________.

Now let's touch on another common misconception, that race is determined by territorial borders. For example my boss is Austrian. He is as German as they come, with all the psychological traits. All the peoples from that region have similar traits and customs as well as some physical features which are not quite as apparent.

If I ever have to answer a question about my race, say on a job application, I would answer Euro-American. Not that I fill out job applications, I just call and schedule the interview which usually includes the first day of work, but that's me.

Having been raised in my particular environment I had a chance to observe different "races", or breeds, or ethnicities, whatever word suits you. And there are twists.

One such twist is a family I know. Absolutely Hungarian, the Parents from Hungary, literally. The Father was white as a sheet, and the Mother black as coal but without any mongol features. Even so it is pretty obvious that her ancestors cam from somewhere else. Which brings us to the next question.

If all life evolved in Africa, how the hell did they get to Norway, Greenland, Alaska or America for that matter ? Is that to say that all the people in Africa who left made boats and sailed around the globe, leaving behind those without such ambitions ? Or was it the slave trade ?

Many people in this thread have brought up good points, and despite the slight infighting it has stayed on course fairly well. But my opinion is this, I don't need quotes and cites, I am giving you my opinion based on my life experience, in other words, I AM the cite or quote. As I explained to my buddy's son when he was in college, anyone can write anything, and having letters after your name does not mean you are right. How many times has the scientific and medical community reversed itself ?

I do appreciate the point of the OP, and I do care about other "races". I don't like what we are doing to the Iraqis, I don't like the censorship in Gernamy, I don't like the way the Chinese government treats the people, I don't like the extremely repressive laws imposed on the Singaporeans, but I can do niothing about it.

However, the statement that there is no such thing as race is inherently illogical. The concept is good, but the wording was bad. We are all the same species. I agree. In my older years I developed a cohesion to the human species. Even though different breeds are different than me, they are no less important in the grand scheme of things.

But I know if I am hanging out with an Asian, he is unlikely to accept a beer if I offer one. I know my Polack Grandfather mated with a German, and both families were pissed off about it.

I know there is a tendency of the powers that be to try to get people to assimilate, to forget their ethnicity. Of that I can find some real proof, but you will have to mail me to get it, it is too controversial for this board,  and that is because the source is of a certain ethnicity. For that, I will find the cite, but it will never appear on this board. It was an article saying that "we should reduce immigration because people are not assimilating, they are sticking with their own group", something like that.

Perhaps I am too dangerous to participate here. I can see more of the big picture than some, and it ain't pretty. So I will shutup now.

T

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 2:54:42 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FullfigRIMaam

Thank you KittinSol.   I've been going through a lot at home, so trying to stay away from serious discussions.    M


Ms. M:
So nice to see you on the boards again.
thompson

(in reply to FullfigRIMaam)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 3:03:27 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Seeks:
How do the countries of Africa differ in substance from many countries in Europe in their inability to govern themselves effectively.  If you would look at each and compare it to any country in Europe that had similar circumstances you will find similar results.
thompson

I hope MrT that you are aware of what has happened in a country called Zimbabwe. I am fairly sure you probably are. If so then I simply do not understand how you can possibly ask such a question.
If not then it might be worth having a search on the net to find out.

I have never made a criticism directed at any indivual African or African American and I have always been aware that what I have said on these matters they will find offensive.
Since I have made my points, courtesy of the CM Forum, over quite a number of posts I have decided to "drop it" and not return to these matters.
Till the next time anyway lol

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 3:51:50 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
What precisely keeps Triticale from being a new species? What species does it belong to wheat or rye?

Its a hybrid, a cross between wheat and rye, somewhat similar to the result if a Dachsund were mated with a Great Dane. No new species is produced. is it ?

If the demarcation of species is defined as  "wotsits" which can or cannot breed together, which you keep asserting, then does that mean there is no species distinction between "wotsits" that reproduce asexually ?

I believe that there is no rigorous scientific categorisation of species.




(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 4:18:39 PM   
lucern


Posts: 54
Joined: 11/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
So then we have the Asians, etc., and they are not the same as everyone else. Noone in their right mind can deny that. But we Polacks can mate with them so therefore we must be the same species. But can we Polacks mate with a Rhesus monkey ? Can we mate with dogs and cats ? No.

So perhaps I am not really a racist or racialist, I guess I might be called an ethnicist. So we are not of a certain race we are of a certain ethnicity.

Or we could take the other route, I am a breedist.

Yes, no races just breeds of a species, like dogs.

You shouldn't get me started like this kittensol. Would you prefer the word breed or ethnicity ? Because the concept is real for sure. You just can't ignore facts, there are differences. If you ignore facts you are ________.

Termyn8or,

What is this problem of conception or categorization that you believe ethnicity handles?  Ethnicity, by the way, starts out on thin ice.  Marcus Banks details the invention of the ethnicity idea in Ethnicity: Anthropological Constructions (1996).  The short of it is that no coherent ethnicity concept ever formed among the people inventing the word, and then guess what - it 'escaped' into popular usage for whatever grey area between race and culture they wanted to use.   If this is ethnicity, don't expect any clarity added to this discussion. 

quote:

Many people in this thread have brought up good points, and despite the slight infighting it has stayed on course fairly well. But my opinion is this, I don't need quotes and cites, I am giving you my opinion based on my life experience, in other words, I AM the cite or quote. As I explained to my buddy's son when he was in college, anyone can write anything, and having letters after your name does not mean you are right. How many times has the scientific and medical community reversed itself ?


You don't need to listen to authority on this, because the 'authorities' want you to actually understand rather than just take their words for it.  That's science, however qualitative.  It's worth noting the vast difference between what they do and the two cents you're giving though.  When you make judgements broadly about society at large from your own experiences, you're using idiographic reasoning.  We all do it.  This is not to be glorified.  Society isn't so uniform that your miniscule experiences will match up to the entirety of social interaction. 

How do social scientists and others know what they know?  Nomothetic reasoning: when you go out of your way to look at things that explore society more broadly, then you're on your way to understanding that which you seek.  This entails the doing or reading or otherwise engaging actual research.  I'm a social scientist (in the sense that I've done social science).  I don't expect others to be, but of these two ways of learning about the world around you, one of them is the gateway to ignorance if left unchecked, and is a primary stumbling block of heightening the public discourse on race.  Anyone can write anything.  That does not make these writings equal, nor does it corrupt careful and insightful works on society with the insane.  To paraphrase anthropologist Clifford Geertz: "just because it is impossible to perform surgery in a sterile environment does not mean we should do so in a septic tank."

quote:

If all life evolved in Africa, how the hell did they get to Norway, Greenland, Alaska or America for that matter ? Is that to say that all the people in Africa who left made boats and sailed around the globe, leaving behind those without such ambitions ? Or was it the slave trade ?

Incidentally, we may not know all of the details about how people got to the continents they were found on (like, in how many waves of migration), but in the simplest terms: they walked there.  They probably sailed to Greenland, but there has not been people there for nearly as long as other places.  Find an oceanographic depth chart, and tell me that during an ice age there isn't an enormous land bridge between Asia and North America, and tell me it'd be hard walking to Europe.  Also, it's worth mentioning that people did not only 'evolve in Africa'.  Evolution doesn't stop.  And here: an ugly altitude map that gets the job done.  http://www.radcyberzine.com/xglobe/depths_1440.jpg

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 4:28:07 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Why so defensive?  (It's a good rule of thumb that when people start using words like "Sisyphean," you know you've hit a sore spot.)

You're free to believe whatever you want to believe, and no one demanded that you change the world.  I'm just asking why you would adopt a world-view that you know is ignorant.  Most people with an ignorant world-view aren't aware that it's ignorant.  But you freely admitted it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: QuietlySeeking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Why would you consciously adopt the world-view of people who you ACKNOWLEDGE are uneducated?  Sure, if you need to communicate with them, it's helpful to know how they think (or how you think they think--what you said did sound a little arrogant).  But why would you accept their ideas yourself if you're aware that they're ignorant?


Because I have more than enough things that I *can* change in my life and the lives of those around me to worry about something as amorphous as the definition and usage of the word "race". 

I'll leave the Sisyphean task of changing the social fabric of the entire world (regarding the definition of a single word) to folks such as you and kittensol.

(in reply to QuietlySeeking)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 5:32:56 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Seeks:
How do the countries of Africa differ in substance from many countries in Europe in their inability to govern themselves effectively.  If you would look at each and compare it to any country in Europe that had similar circumstances you will find similar results.
thompson

I hope MrT that you are aware of what has happened in a country called Zimbabwe. I am fairly sure you probably are. If so then I simply do not understand how you can possibly ask such a question.
If not then it might be worth having a search on the net to find out.

I have never made a criticism directed at any indivual African or African American and I have always been aware that what I have said on these matters they will find offensive.
Since I have made my points, courtesy of the CM Forum, over quite a number of posts I have decided to "drop it" and not return to these matters.
Till the next time anyway lol

 
Seeks:
My post still stands. 
I agree with you that Zimbabwe has serious problems.  Do those problems stem from some endemic inability of black people to govern themselves or could it stem from the criminal behavior of certain individuals?  There are numerous counter examples of non-black governments suffering the same sorts of problems at different times in the history of our planet.
thompson

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 7:04:34 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

You shouldn't get me started like this kittensol. Would you prefer the word breed or ethnicity ? Because the concept is real for sure. You just can't ignore facts, there are differences. If you ignore facts you are ________.



Nobody asked you to participate. Actually, considering the content of the rest of your post, I wish you hadn't.

quote:



Perhaps I am too dangerous to participate here. I can see more of the big picture than some, and it ain't pretty. So I will shutup now.



Good that you eventually did... shame it wasn't before you dumped on the thread.

Vous êtes un âne.

PS: edited for obvious accentuation reasons (see below).




< Message edited by kittinSol -- 8/3/2007 7:26:42 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 7:13:11 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Vous avez mal épelé le mot "êtes," mademoiselle.

Il faut bien s'arrêter quand on insulte les ânes!

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Vous ètes un âne.

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 7:17:49 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Et merde  .

Et maintenant, que fais-je? Qui suis-je? Dans quel état j'erre?

_____________________________



(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 9:18:57 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
What precisely keeps Triticale from being a new species? What species does it belong to wheat or rye?

Its a hybrid, a cross between wheat and rye, somewhat similar to the result if a Dachsund were mated with a Great Dane. No new species is produced. is it ?

No it is more like what would happen if a dog mated with a fox or a hyeana. Rye and wheat aren't very closely related and simply are not very compatible. If you missed it before the basic hybrid was nonviable and useless it was only when polyploidy was chemically induced did a truly useful and true breeding plant came into existence. The plant is visually different from both ancestors as is the grain that it produces. If you encountered it without knowing anything about its history there is little chance you would call it either wheat or rye. Which was your species concept last time you dared to express one.

quote:

If the demarcation of species is defined as  "wotsits" which can or cannot breed together, which you keep asserting, then does that mean there is no species distinction between "wotsits" that reproduce asexually ?

I believe that there is no rigorous scientific categorisation of species.

No. There are a different species concept used when dealing with organisms that reproduce asexually. One basic definition is that all genetically identical, or nearly identical, organisms are the same species.

As to there being rigorous scientific definition of species nothing could be farther from the truth. There are dozens. Different ones are used in different circumstances. For instance the biological concept requiring interbreeding is obviously useless when classifying fossils. So a morphological species concept is used instead with those involved being completely cognizant that fossils assigned to the same species might not have been interfertile and fossils assigned to different species or genus might have been interfertile.

I'm always puzzled why creationists believe the scientists involved in this work have never given any thought to these matters.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/3/2007 9:36:29 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

I might ask you to stop taking my own words, removing them from their context and pretending they support something resembling a witty retort. I won't actually ask because that would be akin to taking a beloved treat away from a child. I am a sadist but I am not cruel.


And you say you're not being emotional. =/

PS- I'd like more intelligent people to become consistently available for such discussions on threads. So, yeah, when you say stupid things like this, it does bug me. You're one less person with a voice.


i.e. you are going to ignore me because I disagree with you in an effective manner and call you on your bullshit.


I've answered all of your questions.. even this ego-driven bit you've been blurting out..

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

As long as you keep pulling cheap semantic antics and putting words in my mouth (and the mouths of anyone else who has given you the benefit of their attention) while ignoring the plainly spoken ones I have actually offered, you can pretty much be assured that the supply of "intelligent people" willing to engage you seriously will continue to dry up.


..yeah.. I'm putting words in your mouth..

Sure, why not?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

I love Internet drama! Screw debates! Muhahaha! Ouch.. I bruised my own ego. Boohoo.

President Bush is my lover.. he'll make the hurities go away.

Although you're certainly going to go on another emotional rant about how I'm abusing you.

---

Look, if it's not about the "race existing" topic, or a possible related topic, such as "effectual usages of the concept of race", it doesn't belong here. Though, if it's not related, I do reserve the right to continue teasing you about it.

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 12:24:56 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
Sorry, I thought you were ignoring me, Curious. Didn't mean to inspire a passive aggressive meltdown on your part.

I couldn't find the post where you got that quote from though. I must have blurted it out in the heat of one of my emotional outbursts. How mortifying! And how very clever of you to guess that I'd probably respond. You sure have my number.

I love rational debate. I just need something more substantive from you than 'I see coloured people' to warrant a response.

Feel free to continue ignoring me all you like.


Seeks - are you seriously saying that the troubles in Africa are mostly, if not entirely caused by genetics? That's what I hear you saying in your posts. If that's not what you mean, you might want to rephrase it. And if it would help to settle on a definition of the word species, even just for use here, feel free to offer one of your own.

Speciation, as demonstrated by the silent crickets of Hawaii, begins with populations becoming isolated by location, behaviour, culture, mutation or other pressures. Apparently that can take a matter of a few generations. The genetic divergence takes tens of thousands of years before subspecies become distinct species. But if the populations remain isolated long enough it invariably happens.

I'd be keen to hear your theory of speciation.



Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 1:53:39 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Species: Like many things the deeper you look into them the more difficult it becomes to really understand or define them. I haven't got a general definition and neither it seems have our beloved scientists. A definition that varies depending on what is being observed isn't much use. is it?
I believe the same problem arises when trying to define "life"
Scientific elites just dont know as much as they like to project and as many willing followers like to believe

To comment on the "difficulties" in Africa, which are continent wide as you all know, would break my new rule of silence. I stand by my posts We must all draw our own conclusions as to the root causes of the problems.

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 3:52:41 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemeslave

To comment on the "difficulties" in Africa, which are continent wide as you all know, would break my new rule of silence. I stand by my posts We must all draw our own conclusions as to the root causes of the problems.



Seeks:
That Africa has problems is not in question....what  the root and constituent causes of said problems is.
It would be a shame to loose your valued input into this discussion.
If on the other hand you have only bigotry and slur to offer then perhaps it is best for you to stay on the sidelines.
thompson

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 6:42:35 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Species: Like many things the deeper you look into them the more difficult it becomes to really understand or define them. I haven't got a general definition and neither it seems have our beloved scientists. A definition that varies depending on what is being observed isn't much use. is it?
I believe the same problem arises when trying to define "life"
Scientific elites just dont know as much as they like to project and as many willing followers like to believe

This is getting so very tiresome. Different species concepts for different situations seems to work just fine for those working in the relevant fields. Only disgruntled outsiders whining that no new species have ever emerged seem to have any problem with this issue. Remember it was you who made the claim that I so thoroughly disproved that you've dropped it in an attempot to quibble over semantics. Now you are stuck either wheat and rye are the same species or triticale is a new species which pretty well ends your creationist claim to the contrary.

As to defining life there is a single big issue still being worked on. Should a definition of 'life' include or exclude viruses. The issues artound this are entirely off topic in this thread and of no real interest to me. So if it matters to you dust off your newsreader and post a question on talk.origins where the denizens will be happy to explain the issues to you. Don't worry they don't bite and are used to dealing with creationists and bigots.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 7:43:54 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
kittensol, thank you for the personal attention. I will now reciprocate.

If all you wanted was total agreement and a lovey dovey attitude from everybody, why did you post it ? I don't know what your world is like but mine is real.

I mean, just what did you expect in the way of responses ? You DID expect responses no ?

Or would you rather people lie, and placate you ? This is a diverse board, with people from all over, what did you expect ? Am I the only dissenter of whom you are intolerant ? Again, what did you expect ? I will quote my Father now "Quit cher fukin whining". You started it.

We disagree. That doesn't cost you my basic respect. I know you are not stupid, but I disagree with some of your conclusions. This is a discussion forum, and I would never wish that a dissenting opinion be stifled after mine. I don't post shit to get total agreement and moral support, I want to hear from the people who think I am nuts as well. I really do.

Whatever I think of your basic opinions, and I am sure there are some things on which we agree (still checking), I am dismayed by your statement that you wish I hadn't participated in this thread. Nothing else.

In other words if I post something and people disagree, I WANT to know about it. Perhaps we will never agree on this particular point, but now the banter includes other people. Not all of them are on your side of the fence by the way. We must agree to disagree.

I am fully cognizant of the fact that I am not going to convince you of my point of view, as such I will not try. But that does not mean that I am bowing out of this thread. There is no reason.

Suffice it to say I disagree. I have as much right to voice this as you did to start the whole issue. I have not been insulting or anything like that, otherwise Moderator eleven would have been down my throat with a hot poker or some other undesirable object.

It is indeed within your priveledge as a CM member to state that you wish I hadn't posted something, and it is similarly within my priveledge to say that I wish you had never started this thread. But you said it, and I didn't. I am glad you started this controversy. Please do it again, for I will be here. And I shall express my opinion. And so will the rest.

My next post will be on topic, rather than expressing my dismay that someone would rather not hear any dissent for the OP. Hell, I thought that's why we're here.

T

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 7:44:58 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Why anyone who holds that the idea, yes one simple idea, underpinning Evoluton by Natural Selection is untrue should be deemed a creationist I do not know.

When it was established in the 1950's how complex, both in their structure and function, are the molecules that constitute life and how far back in time those molecules have existed it should have been admitted that the possibilty of life spontaneously arising and evolving  by chance mutations is so small as to be non existant.

What is the original driving force, I do not know. I am less astounded by the idea of some initiating motivator, ie a creator, than I am by Darwinism.

Just adding that Termyn8tr's post above is spot on IMO

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 8/4/2007 7:48:02 AM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 7:50:36 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

I'm not a "Caucasian". According to my other brothers and sisters (who live on the planet Zaptroid, which is in a galaxy far, far away)  - I'm an Alien. Chew on that idea for awhile...
- Susan


SusanofO:
There are no immigration quotas for Zaptrodians.  This defines you as a criminal illegal alien who is here to steal jobs from hard working citizens...La Migra has been alerted and are on there way to your home to take you into custody for a spanking followed by deportation.
thompson


Everything you ever needed to know about illegal immigration can be learned in the South Park episode "Goobacks."

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. - 8/4/2007 8:02:34 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Poor, poor Termy. Bad, bad kitty. So not fair, is it?

Look, I shan't go into the details of what you said; it's a tactic on the boards, one I occasionally use, but a very tedious one for others to read (you know, deconstructing another's entire post and interjecting one's personal comments ever two or three lines. It makes for extra long posts that aren't reader-friendly at all.)

There are a couple of posters on this thread who had constructive things to say: MadameDahlia, who's a bit of an expert, and Lucern, who also knows about the subject, albeit from a different perspective than mine. I have no problem with different perspectives. I object to self-congratulatory and wilfully ignorant and destructive rhetorics, such as the one you have exhibited more than once on these boards.

Remember the 'Jewish thread' a week ago? I haven't forgotten. And what you say now fits with what you said then. And it's fucking ugly, my friend.

PS: I am wrong. There are more than a couple of interesting posters on this thread. I mentioned Dahlia and Lucern because they speak from a specialist's perspective. Many others - Zensee, Lord&m and thompy are as interesting as ever too.


< Message edited by kittinSol -- 8/4/2007 8:05:10 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: There isn't such a thing as 'races' in humanity. Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156