ChainsandFreedom
Posts: 222
Joined: 6/20/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
Chains, Quite happy to lay it to rest, really. As for playing devil's advocate, I sometimes do that. Not because I inherently think there's any need to do it in the sense people often take it, but because convictions (of any nature) need to be challenged from time to time, and because the opposing view can help define one's own view. Either one changes one's opinion based on the exchange, or one comes out of it with a renewed conviction that one has a better sense of why one subscribes to. As for the scene, it is not nearly as "enlightened" and tolerant as you think. Stop to think about the word "tolerant" itself. It essentially means "putting up with". Not accepting, or respecting, but simply putting up with. There is plenty of condescension, and subgroups in the community are ostracized and shunned by the rest, with plenty of people drawing their own line in the sand and thinking it more universally correct than the one the majority has already drawn. Just have a look at LatexBaby, or the "Shit" thread, or whatever. As Faramir has pointed out elsewhere, this is part of what you would call "othering": making another group the out-group, exempt from the normal considerations afforded the in-group, much as with jews a few decades ago. As to the societal problem, I agree that society will not change, with the caveat that it I mean it will not change on its own. That is why I advocate that people who do not have too much to lose from going public with their lifestyle should do so. Women had to fight for the right to vote and be something other than their husbands' property. Gay and lesbian people are still fighting for equal rights with heterosexuals. Intersex people are fighting to stop intersex genital mutilation. And so forth. We should be fighting for our rights. And we should have the "enlightenment" to stand up for others, as well. We all know what it is like to be in a distinct minority, and should fight for other minorities for this very reason, even minorities in our own community. That includes fighting to have prostitution legalized, because that is a necessary first step in fighting on the prostitutes' side. Yes, it is only a first step, but that is how one walks: one foot in front of the other, one step at a time, until the journey ends. Aswad, Thats rock and roll baby, thats rock and roll. Glad I had the chance to cross paths with someone I agree with so much. I've always been fighting for rights, since before I was old enough for people to point out I was a middle class white guy in order to try and discourage me. I know that in NYC there is some overlap between the gay 'leather' community and the BDSM one, or the womans rights community and the domme community, but you're right, sexual minorities certainly don't have it easy in the western tradition. And BDSM needs to stond riding on the coat-tails of other social lib movements and start speaking out for ourselves. But I'm sure thats what attracts writers like you and I to it so much...a cause so behind most of the public isn't even aware its a cause yet. It's easy to say 'yeah but because of my job I can't go public', but then a again, you have a good point - if you're not 'going public' or doing something to contribute to that public image, your just living in persicution and social shame. Men and Women have a responsibility to stand up for what they love and live by...theres plenty of social scene outlets, but theres few political ones I've come across. Contributing by just being there is something, but if you hear of an organized way to contribute more, kindly let me know. Not to argue against you, rather to point out a complication: this "othering" you speak of: In the US, a big part of people's acceptance of gay culture has been contingent on the popularity of sub-groups created by this 'othering'. Voters accepting gay culture because they know members of it well themselves is one thing, but often the only way to reach out to the largely in the dark masses is through a public image.'Gays like fashion and shopping and they'll be a girls best friend just like on TV so I like gays". Or, 'lesbians are hot and kiss other lesbians publically in my favorite nightclub so I like them since they turn me on'. What I've noticed happen is that a sense of inclusion/other makes a group more acceptable even while it ostricises the majority of a group from itself. On the flip side, a minority group often finds itself pressured to manufacture a public image for itself which is more palitable than one inclusive of all its members. The public acceptance and leagle/social rights you speak of is likely to exasberate the act of 'othering', not diminish it... I think a part of the reason the scene HAS allowed itself to be persicuted and swept under the rug of social consciouness as long as it has is that there is a difference between fulfilling you individual, personal goals(which is selfish in light of other peoples similar struggles) and supporting members of a loose-knit scene who often don't agree with the way you do things who you might not choose to sanction yourself. I guess my point is that I agree with you about fighting for other sexually marginalized people, but unlike something as black and white as ethnic/religious rights, its hard for a group of people with so many diverse interest's to unify under a single unified idenity to present to the world. often, people 'in the scene' can be more judgemental than those outside of it, because they believe you are similar to them and they know how you "should" be accomplishing your goals. I honestly don't know how to simultainiously fight for the rights of the group while protecting my interests as an individual, and I think this is an obsticale BD, SM, DS people face more acutely than some other social minorities. Thanks for the oppertunity for my mind to go off on this tangent and thanks once again for keeping my time bound to this one thread :) xak
|