Faramir
Posts: 1043
Joined: 2/12/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 Can I say- I really didn't understand the question at all. Can you rephrase? Weird - some people found the question very clear and others obscure - anyway: I guess it wouold be like "Love Languages." Anyone might appreciate service, or a gift, or quality time together - but maybe Physical Touch is your love language, the heart of the matter for you. In my little piece of fiction, the speaker has a full range of BDSM interests, but for he and his partner, a specific DM act is a core act fraught with symbology. That core act of SM sums up, articulates in a special way, the essence of the relationship. Some people here have answered that providing service was essential for them - where the rubber met the road: "My core is providing for Mistress' pleasure in whatever fashion She desires" and "Serving, pleasing, seeing Him smile, everything." Others also keyed in on SM: "i will endure any kind of pain,any kind of suffering,any kind of humilation, i will do all of this lovingly,anything to see that look of pleasure on his face," and quote:
"....finally relenting and smacking his cock hard...his body jackknifing as he hardens more...knees pulled up tight and spread...hands hitting hard on his inner thighs....the blows to his cock making him whimper with the need to explode....his head rolling back and forth as his body arcs...hearing his cry of final release...the only sounds he can make now....watching his body sag as he cums under My touch...waiting for the look of adoration that will be there when he can finally open his eyes and focus once again" Several mentioned "ownership" as their functional core. Maybe a given person doesn't have one area that is particularly fraught with meaning for them - maybe they are spread equally over a lot of things (like being multi-lingual in love languages). It's been interesting to hear the different responses. Real shift for me as a het male Dom to read GentleLady's response - a mirror of my speaker's words (who while not me, certainly borrows from me).
|