domtimothy46176
Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004 From: Dayton, Ohio area Status: offline
|
I don't think it has to be consensual to be one's core. In my example, her core appeared to be getting hit. His appeared to be otherwise but, by virtue of the the fact that they stayed together, one would assume that each had their core needs met. They might not have shared a mutual "core" but that wasn't the question posed by the OP, unless I misread it. I do think a relationship works best when both parties have their deepest needs met in a symbiotic manner, but I doubt that is the case for the majority. I believe that more often than not core needs are met in a negotiated manner, "my tat for your tit", if you will. As to the topics of domestic violence and abuse, I believe both occur but I don't equate one with the other simply because the sometimes occur together. I may be completely radical in my thinking here, but I do believe that sometimes non-consensual domestic violence is NOT abuse. I have interacted with those who chose to accept the violence because their greater needs were met in other ways. While they did not consent to the violence, they did remain within the situation of their own free will, even given viable options. Perhaps the case could be made that metaconsent exists in such circumstances, but I don't want to completely derail the conversation parsing words. Before I'm branded as a completely insensitive SOB, let me say that I have the utmost empathy for those who find themselves abused within relationships they can't escape, but I also believe that is the minority of cases. Be well, Timothy
|