Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Land grab in the Artic


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Land grab in the Artic Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 6:22:50 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Looks as tho' we will have to man the gunboats with instructions to "watch the Canadians".
Just so we know what we are up against does Canada maintain military forces ?

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 6:51:52 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
yes they do, and they are paid in canadian money. so al we gotta do to have them come to our side is wave a few greenbacks around.


LOLOLOLOLOL


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 7:01:35 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Wait a second, I thought global warming was a hoax.

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Canada has been gearing up for this for quite some time now.  With the warming planet they estimate in about 20 years there will be a functioning North West passage, and huge amounts of shipping is going to start passing through.



According to FirmHandKY's computer modelling studies, it is.

Somebody should tell the Canadians.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 7:56:30 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Cute.

And cigarette smoking doesn't really cause cancer.

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Sorry you are confused LAM.  That the planet warms and cools, and has been in a long term warming, with a few dips since the trough of the last Ice Age, is not disputed by anyone, except a few "Flat Earth" types.  The Geologic record sugests it will get quite a bit hotter before it cools off again.  There is debate over whether there is Man caused Catastrophic Global warming, and if it is man caused what to do about it.....which is a different thread and has been beaten to death.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 8:00:12 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Wait a second, I thought global warming was a hoax.

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Canada has been gearing up for this for quite some time now.  With the warming planet they estimate in about 20 years there will be a functioning North West passage, and huge amounts of shipping is going to start passing through.



According to FirmHandKY's computer modelling studies, it is.

Somebody should tell the Canadians.

Sinergy


It is gonna be funny to see their faces when they find all this out.

Ron


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 8:05:29 AM   
BlueCollar


Posts: 74
Joined: 7/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
yes they do, and they are paid in canadian money. so al we gotta do to have them come to our side is wave a few greenbacks around.
LOLOLOLOLOL


You do know that the Canadian Dollar is over $0.95 US and rising, right?  I pretty sure you're thinking of a time back in the 90s when the dollar was hovering around 70-80 cents.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 8:42:03 AM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueCollar

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
yes they do, and they are paid in canadian money. so al we gotta do to have them come to our side is wave a few greenbacks around.
LOLOLOLOLOL


You do know that the Canadian Dollar is over $0.95 US and rising, right?  I pretty sure you're thinking of a time back in the 90s when the dollar was hovering around 70-80 cents.

Yep - the weak dollar is one of the reasons for the decrease in traffic at Windsor's casinos.  It's not such a bargain anymore, compared to the ones in Detroit.

...just wait 'til folks need passports to cross, that'll put another whammy on 'em.

thornhappy

(in reply to BlueCollar)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 8:42:08 AM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Looks as tho' we will have to man the gunboats with instructions to "watch the Canadians".
Just so we know what we are up against does Canada maintain military forces ?


Anyone that knows anything never trusted those damned Canadians.

Their eyes are too close together.

A sure sign of criminal intent if you ask me.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 8:45:00 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Griswold

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Looks as tho' we will have to man the gunboats with instructions to "watch the Canadians".
Just so we know what we are up against does Canada maintain military forces ?


Anyone that knows anything never trusted those damned Canadians.

Their eyes are too close together.

A sure sign of criminal intent if you ask me.


Wha'da'ya mean? We got the Arctic fair and square, in the time honoured and globally approved method of taking it from the people who lived there, the Inuit.

No robot sub or silly Ruski flag can trump that.

Now get off our snow heap!


Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to Griswold)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 9:12:10 AM   
abytchgoddess4u


Posts: 268
Joined: 10/17/2004
Status: offline
Excuse me?!? I am thoroughly offended! I can't believe you said our eyes are too close together and therefore show criminal intent!

Effin' Americans! Always having to insult somebody!

Don't you know we have BEADY eyes and floppy heads??


_____________________________

"Everything in the Universe Is within you.
Ask all from yourself." Rumi

"The world will know and understand me someday. But if that day does not arrive, it does not greatly matter. I shall have opened the way for other women."
George Sand

(in reply to Griswold)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 11:14:52 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Not everyone studies Southpark, but it might help to do so.

Ron


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to abytchgoddess4u)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 11:29:02 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
LAM, I don't think it was cute, it is truth.  That is why you could only respond with a flippiant response, instead of logic or reasoning.  Most people who smoke a cigarette do not get cancer(lung cancer), and not all lung cancer victims were smokers....So smoking does not "cause" cancer, but increases the chances.

I do understand why you do not want to get into a "what to do about it " discussion on Global Climate variation.  If Carbon Offsets, had been allowed as part of Kyoto it would have been law a decade ago

< Message edited by luckydog1 -- 8/11/2007 11:30:41 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 11:48:55 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Please, I've written at length about global warming and "what to do about it" right here in these forums.  I'm just not in the mood to go over it all AGAIN, especially not for someone who's proved in the past that he disregards inconvenient facts.

Let's just say that the overwhelming majority of climate scientists are on my side, and leave it at that.  Yes, they could all be wrong...and the pyramids could have been built by extraterrestrials, too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

LAM, I don't think it was cute, it is truth.  That is why you could only respond with a flippiant response, instead of logic or reasoning.  Most people who smoke a cigarette do not get cancer(lung cancer), and not all lung cancer victims were smokers....So smoking does not "cause" cancer, but increases the chances.

I do understand why you do not want to get into a "what to do about it " discussion on Global Climate variation.  If Carbon Offsets, had been allowed as part of Kyoto it would have been law a decade ago

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 12:43:49 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
LAM, but your what to do about it was join Kyoto.  If the Goal of Kyoto was to lower Global Net Co2 emmisions, it could have included offsets and been implemented over 10 years ago.  So obvioulsy the goal is something other than lowering Global Net CO2 emmissions.  Simply look at how Kyoto was put together and you can easily see the purpose. and it has nothing to do with the enviroment... And you are not dumb enough to pretend you don't know it.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 12:48:22 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
It wasn't implemented ten years ago because the United States refused to accept it.  Other than that, I don't know what you're talking about.

Besides, when have I ever mentioned the Kyoto Protocol?  It's already out of date.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 12:57:59 PM   
Emperor1956


Posts: 2370
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
FR:   Notwithstanding the masturbatory arguments above, cigarette smoke DOES in fact cause cancer.  Or things contained in that smoke do.  That's why we call certain things a "carcinogen".  Not all people who smoke get cancer.  Not all cancers are caused by cigarette smoke.  But it is pretty well accepted by anyone with 3/4 of a brain that several of the components of cigarette smoke cause cancer.

Portugal once was one of the most powerful countries in the world.  How the mighty have fallen, eh?

and the only reason to comment on this thread at all is it allowed Ron to say "usufruct"   Hee heeeeee.

P

_____________________________

"When you wake up, Pooh," said Piglet, "what's the first thing you say?"
"What's for breakfast? What do you say, Piglet?"
"I say, I wonder what's going to happen exciting today?"
Pooh nodded thoughtfully.
"It's the same thing," he said.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 1:11:18 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
You're right, of course, but I didn't bother to take him up on that because he was using a right-wing conception of "causality" that serves no purpose other than to relieve cigarette companies of their legal and moral obligations.  He is saying that, since not everyone who smokes a cigarette will come down with cancer, smoking can't CAUSE cancer; at best it CONTRIBUTES to it.  I didn't want to get into a whole discussion of sufficient causes, efficient causes, etc., with someone whose sole purpose seems to be try to convert the Collarme forums to Fox News Web Edition.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

Notwithstanding the masturbatory arguments above, cigarette smoke DOES in fact cause cancer.  Or things contained in that smoke do.  That's why we call certain things a "carcinogen".  Not all people who smoke get cancer.  Not all cancers are caused by cigarette smoke.  But it is pretty well accepted by anyone with 3/4 of a brain that several of the components of cigarette smoke cause cancer.

(in reply to Emperor1956)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 1:19:19 PM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline
Isn't the Candian commander in chief Dudley Do Right?

_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 4:37:41 PM   
dolceservo


Posts: 18
Joined: 10/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Even tho' the land grab of the Golden West in the USA was undoubtedly "right" I'll bet this one isn't. he he he he he
Dont do as I did whatever you do.


I wouldn't be absolutely sure that this "grab" is not right.
I personally don't think it is as i am in favor to the old british idea of "the freedom of sea doctrine" limiting national rights and juristiction over the oceans to a tiny strip of land surrounding a nation's coastline ( cannon range initially then fixed to 3 nautical miles).
The modern international law however is quite different and this principle is unfortunately completely unattended.
It was first Truman who, in a declaration the 28th september 1945 extended the united states jurisdiction over all natural resources on the nation's continental shelf and other nations followed right away.
The principle was at the end established in a UN conference in montego bay in 1982 , the works of this conference are the the foundation of the modern Sea Law ( ironically the convention is not yet ratified by the US).
The convention establishes that the sea up to 200 nautical miles and more if there is a continental shelf continuity as it claims Russia for the north pole.
If the north pole lies on the same continental shelf of Russia, the russian would be just respecting the current international law.
Of course that is not yet proved and the claims of Canada, Denmark, Norway ( the US who have not signed the convention can't claim anything according to the convention of Montego Bay) are still valid.
The russians claims however cannot easily dismissed as a joke but they must be taken into consideration. these claims don't come from nowhere but on the contrary they are inspired from the precedents of the US (and other countries) and find a support even in the international law.

have a good day you all!



(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Land grab in the Artic - 8/11/2007 5:09:37 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Wait a second, I thought global warming was a hoax.

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Canada has been gearing up for this for quite some time now.  With the warming planet they estimate in about 20 years there will be a functioning North West passage, and huge amounts of shipping is going to start passing through.



yup that "we" caused it is a haox.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Land grab in the Artic Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094