Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 6:52:23 AM   
EbonyFtshGoddess


Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Hollywood Hills, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueCollar

First off, I'm not making any sort of indictment against the EU, and I can fully appreciate what a positive impact it as had on the continent.  However, some of the arguments of the EU overstepping it's mandates (while still few and far between) are totally legitimate.  The main complaint I hear is about political transparency.  Many people simply don't know what's going in Brussels and don't see how issues that are debated there shouldn't be a topic for the politicos in London, or Paris, or Rome respectively.

The most concerning issue with the SPPNA is also transparency.  So much policy is getting written and discussed behind closed doors - no wonder people are getting paranoid about it.

Quoting the Toronto Star:

..Why will the discussion and treaty signing take place behind closed doors?  Why have 30 corporate CEOs from these three countries (Canada, US, and Mexico) been invited to attend, while opposition members of parliament, reresentatives of organized labour, and the general public be excluded?"

Good questions that need answered, in my opinion.


that's all i'm saying. and we can look at the EU model as example.

it's the secrecy i'm not big on.

i'm sorry, i simply don't see how this is being pushed without it being all over the news.

they're meeting again next week and i have YET to hear a peep about it, and i follow the news closely.

why all the secrecy?

that's all i'm asking.





_____________________________

One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish

(in reply to BlueCollar)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 6:55:51 AM   
EbonyFtshGoddess


Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Hollywood Hills, CA
Status: offline
i definitely see your point, however, to say that we've repaired as much as we've fucked up is absurd in my opinion.

ask the iraqis that have to wait in line for DAYS and DAYS in line for a tank of gas. then they're pushing their cars towards an empty station only to be potential victims of an insurgent attack.

as far as mercs in iraq.. well don't get me started on them.

if they get brought up on charges then i suppose our gov will next because they sent them there.

right?




_____________________________

One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish

(in reply to Durus)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 7:04:30 AM   
EbonyFtshGoddess


Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Hollywood Hills, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ChainsandFreedom

Just wanted to say something to Darus:

quote:

One could make an argument that they are more accountable as they would be tried in a criminal court rather then a military court and they are not immune from lawsuit unlike the military. (generally speaking) As Blackwater was not a signatory of the Geneva accords it doesn’t seem reasonable that they abide by them. Certainly our enemy doesn’t.  


If the people who would be bringing suit are slighted citizens of an invaded country, than there would functionally, politically, and economically be no possible way to bring suit. Blackwater accidentally shoots your son in the head, well guess what chances are you're village probably can't raise airfair, lawyers, let alone obtain travel visa's to an American court to see justice served.

Blackwater didn't sign the Geneva Convention because it was the parctice of first world nations at the time of its inception not to use merc's. Given that their fully funded by the American tax payer as well as contracted and chartered to fullfill objectives specific to American interests, one could very easily argue that they are American forces who are thus bound by the geneva convention, and if you want to loophole their non-nation status out of it you probably could still take the constructionist argument that they would have been bound by the geneva convention had the signing nations actively stooped to the dispicable act of mercinary warfare when it was signed.

I might get into how fighting for profit pretty much evaporated any of the moral conviction and ethical reasons a nation could concievably enter into a necessary and just war for, and how simply using mercenaries who inherently lack credibility and accountability to fulfill military objectives regulates us to the status of being no better than a rouge state/paramilitary group for fighting outside the bounds of accepted warfare, but thats another issue I'm sure I would never change your mind about.

Also, we invaded Iraq because they ignored the G.C. and other international treaties.
If we turn around like you did and say 'besides, THEY dont follow it, so lets hire people who don't follow it to fight for us, too', than we had no bussiness invading them if we condone the same actions and are admitting our own guilt in employing the same tactics.

Finally, I just gotta say, im truely confused.
Do you know someone who works for Haliburton? why in the name of all thats holy would you or ANY third party defend them?


poignant points chains.




_____________________________

One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish

(in reply to ChainsandFreedom)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 7:20:40 AM   
EbonyFtshGoddess


Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Hollywood Hills, CA
Status: offline

durus, they are uniformed. i have pics with my Daddy and mercs. they are indistinguishable in uniform. the only distinguishable mark is that my Man was in the sandbox 3 times and couldn't leave and got paid WAY more than they did.

BW is not the way we want our gov to protect us. like seriously. do you want a private contractor having the ability to police us? seriously.. think about it. that is the epitome of a police state. is that seriously what we want? regardless of if things are like legal or constitutional or not.. it's still happening.

i'm sorry, but the day a PRIVATE firm has shoot to kill clearance on american soil, i feel we ALL should be like "what the fuck??" and outraged.

we also emply mercs from iraq and afghanistan. i have photos that my Daddy took of a particular merc they worked with in afghanistan. he has a GREAT photo of an afghani running with a metal briefcase and a fully auto rifle. it's so great because it shows a still picture with SO much movement, but sadly you can see his face really well so he can't really compromise the afghani's cover. i'm sure he'd be killed if his face was shown publically.  mercs are everywhere, and that's what they do, they operate under a cloak of cover. but they are STILL fighting for and with us.

as for what laws are BW breaking.. oh i dunno. maybe not being an actual troop force YET still trust me they DO fight alongside of soldiers sometimes.

or sometimes they fight all on their own. yet they're not *soldiers* they pretty much run rampant  there (and here.. look at post katrina when they had shoot to kill ordinances.)

i'm not opposed to our military- that would be opposing my Daddy and also every other man i know there (i don't know any women there currently so i say man) but i'm not a fan of us being there and i'm not a fan of us employing people that really don't have much accountability.

hell even BW barely cares about the people they employ.

just ask the families of the men strung up from that bridge in Fallujah that year.




_____________________________

One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish

(in reply to Durus)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 7:28:02 AM   
EbonyFtshGoddess


Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Hollywood Hills, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Griswold

Gawwd hon...there are so many phenomenal books...clarifying things I never grasped....and I'm old enough to have grasped....but the back story is often rich.

What else?

A lot.

Tremendous amounts.



there is simply TOO much going on though. what happened to our chutzpah?

then again i do feel powerless, i won't lie.

i vote (gee what a farce THAT is).. i write my congress reps, i try to tell people and trust me..lol none of that truly matters- things keep on truckin' for the sake and good of the  corporate good... whether they know it or not

what is transpiring in our country (the US and the EU for that matter)  is absolutely ALARMING and yet no one gives a shit it seems.






_____________________________

One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish

(in reply to Griswold)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 9:33:26 AM   
Durus


Posts: 184
Joined: 7/9/2007
Status: offline
durus, they are uniformed. i have pics with my Daddy and mercs. they are indistinguishable in uniform. the only distinguishable mark is that my Man was in the sandbox 3 times and couldn't leave and got paid WAY more than they did.

do they have rank tabs, rank insignia, and branch insignia or are they just wearing desert camo?

BW is not the way we want our gov to protect us. like seriously. do you want a private contractor having the ability to police us? seriously.. think about it. that is the epitome of a police state. is that seriously what we want? regardless of if things are like legal or constitutional or not.. it's still happening.

The epitome of a police state is when government has a monopoly on the use of force without accountability. Police states aren't run by a bunch of private companies BUT THE STATE. Now...what do you think police are now? Do you think that they get paid by the town or state makes them more moral or ethical? Would it surprise you to find that town governments are almost universally incorporated anyway so that the division becomes almost meaningless.

i'm sorry, but the day a PRIVATE firm has shoot to kill clearance on american soil, i feel we ALL should be like "what the fuck??" and outraged.
Is getting shot by an agent of the state less tramatic then getting shot by the agent of a private security company? It not who is paying whom or whom the individual works for; it is why they are shooting that is the important question.

we also emply mercs from iraq and afghanistan. i have photos that my Daddy took of a particular merc they worked with in afghanistan. he has a GREAT photo of an afghani running with a metal briefcase and a fully auto rifle. it's so great because it shows a still picture with SO much movement, but sadly you can see his face really well so he can't really compromise the afghani's cover. i'm sure he'd be killed if his face was shown publically.  mercs are everywhere, and that's what they do, they operate under a cloak of cover. but they are STILL fighting for and with us.
Good

as for what laws are BW breaking.. oh i dunno. maybe not being an actual troop force YET still trust me they DO fight alongside of soldiers sometimes.
That isn't against the law.

or sometimes they fight all on their own. yet they're not *soldiers* they pretty much run rampant  there (and here.. look at post katrina when they had shoot to kill ordinances.)
I woul like to hear more about that.

i'm not opposed to our military- that would be opposing my Daddy and also every other man i know there (i don't know any women there currently so i say man) but i'm not a fan of us being there and i'm not a fan of us employing people that really don't have much accountability.

hell even BW barely cares about the people they employ.

just ask the families of the men strung up from that bridge in Fallujah that year.


I'm not a big fan of us being there either but I'm not against the use of mercenaries. I don't think the example you use shows a lack of caring but I'm sure that they care no more for their employees then any other company.



[/quote]

(in reply to EbonyFtshGoddess)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/18/2007 3:48:54 PM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyFtshGoddess

quote:

ORIGINAL: Griswold

Gawwd hon...there are so many phenomenal books...clarifying things I never grasped....and I'm old enough to have grasped....but the back story is often rich.

What else?

A lot.

Tremendous amounts.



there is simply TOO much going on though. what happened to our chutzpah?

then again i do feel powerless, i won't lie.

i vote (gee what a farce THAT is).. i write my congress reps, i try to tell people and trust me..lol none of that truly matters- things keep on truckin' for the sake and good of the  corporate good... whether they know it or not

what is transpiring in our country (the US and the EU for that matter)  is absolutely ALARMING and yet no one gives a shit it seems.


Ahhhh...well said...once again, the back story is key.

There's so much played out behind the scenes...more than I can even begin to expound on.

I have a buddy who can give you 20 hours accurately on one single concept (much like that British "Connections" cable show that was on some years back where they start out at some obscure wheat grinding place on a stream in Virginia in 1743 with a grinding stone, only to take you to some place in Germany who had a similar stone but used it to manufacture munitions, now connected via his brother in law who was a spy for Portugal, who he sent his special grinding capabilities to in 1756 who was able to make a unique characteristic out of South American clay, which then was uniquely able to be an underwater cap on a diving helmet which 35 years later enabled the British to send sound waves through milk which then allowed the Allies to capture German berry farmers...which enabled ultimately....the Paraguains to solve the diabetic issues of small children in sub Saharan Africa which of course, naturally, allowed NASA to solve the whole intergalactic Mars exporer issue of stickiness...which then allowed them to...as you may have guessed...pick up stones on Mars)....and so it goes.

There's always a back story.

< Message edited by Griswold -- 8/18/2007 3:52:39 PM >

(in reply to EbonyFtshGoddess)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North Am... - 8/20/2007 10:08:22 AM   
ChainsandFreedom


Posts: 222
Joined: 6/20/2007
Status: offline
Darus

Mercs are people who's bussiness is to fight for money.
That means killing for money.
If their not fighting in the interests of the country which employ's them, with the honor and responsibility of defending the American Way so to speak, their just murdering for profit. So basically their either privatized soldiers or their murdering for profit. If their privatized American soldiers, their still American soldiers and there should be the same standards of grievence and war law applying to them-if not a more rigourous one because they're all not just vets already but elite vets already. This is my issue. I don't think its in any way immoral to be a soldier-nations need soldiers. I just think its immoral to be a soldier without owning up to the fact you're a soldier which is a calling with a purpose higher than a thousand dollars a day. Which is to say, killing for money rather than to defend the national interest.

The GC didn't cover mercs because they wernt COMMONLY used by major states in situations their regular soldiers were not in recent history up untill the last ten years or so, by America. Nerve gas wasn't covered by the 1860's GC either, but once it was used it was still considered worthy of being outlawed. But I guess its a mute point untill America plays by the law and sends our people already under indicment of war crimes in Kosovo to the trials their due.

You mention that their uniforms dont have common rank insignia. I assume you take issue with this because the GC applies to uniformed soldiers. Well the GC also stipulates what types of personell are supposed to wear a uniform, so simply neglicting to be issued an acceptable uniform does not exonerate you from responsibility.

your bit about Blackwater being accountable because it just might be a prince their offending rather than a defenseless citizen of a country whose interests we're obstensibly fighting to protect goes beyond petty and unrealilistic and does a great dishonor to the ethics and common sense of people in uniform. the members of this higher calling I've met have too much backbone for such a childish, leagally absurd bit of rationalization. If blackwater itself said such amoral things it would be increasingly hard for them to secure funding.

As for your arguments about police officers, again I find your amoralness offensive to those that serve. Police and law enforcement officials take an OATH. They have responsibilities which are clearly not reconciled with their tax-funded paychecks. In return for certain privledges inherent in doing their jobs, they are bound by specific laws and protocal which makes them, indeed, 'above' private security companies. If someone near me was shot by a police officer, personally this would be less tramatic because the police officer was probably doing his BEST to carry out DEMOCRATICLY legislated law, rather than meerly maintaining somebodies private property. I believe your confusing the individual preogitives of the privledge for private parties to make and maintain profit and property with the right of the citizenry to have state-sponsered agents acting on behalf of their interests. The former here is an individualistic interest while the latter is in the interests of everyone. Right to life trumps right to property just as rights trump privledges. There is a keen constitutional and pragmatic interest in not privatizing police forces. Otherwise the Crips could just go legit and crusise around in sirened police cars pulling people over or carrying concealed handguns in public.

Also, in todays world, for private security to kill someone basically means either that security man is going to jail or the person he shot was about to murder him-so yes it would be more traumatic if someone I knew was either a murderer or about to be murdered, rather than being felled in the name of the law.

< Message edited by ChainsandFreedom -- 8/20/2007 10:09:41 AM >

(in reply to Griswold)
Profile   Post #: 68
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078