EbonyFtshGoddess
Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006 From: Hollywood Hills, CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ChainsandFreedom Just wanted to say something to Darus: quote:
One could make an argument that they are more accountable as they would be tried in a criminal court rather then a military court and they are not immune from lawsuit unlike the military. (generally speaking) As Blackwater was not a signatory of the Geneva accords it doesn’t seem reasonable that they abide by them. Certainly our enemy doesn’t. If the people who would be bringing suit are slighted citizens of an invaded country, than there would functionally, politically, and economically be no possible way to bring suit. Blackwater accidentally shoots your son in the head, well guess what chances are you're village probably can't raise airfair, lawyers, let alone obtain travel visa's to an American court to see justice served. Blackwater didn't sign the Geneva Convention because it was the parctice of first world nations at the time of its inception not to use merc's. Given that their fully funded by the American tax payer as well as contracted and chartered to fullfill objectives specific to American interests, one could very easily argue that they are American forces who are thus bound by the geneva convention, and if you want to loophole their non-nation status out of it you probably could still take the constructionist argument that they would have been bound by the geneva convention had the signing nations actively stooped to the dispicable act of mercinary warfare when it was signed. I might get into how fighting for profit pretty much evaporated any of the moral conviction and ethical reasons a nation could concievably enter into a necessary and just war for, and how simply using mercenaries who inherently lack credibility and accountability to fulfill military objectives regulates us to the status of being no better than a rouge state/paramilitary group for fighting outside the bounds of accepted warfare, but thats another issue I'm sure I would never change your mind about. Also, we invaded Iraq because they ignored the G.C. and other international treaties. If we turn around like you did and say 'besides, THEY dont follow it, so lets hire people who don't follow it to fight for us, too', than we had no bussiness invading them if we condone the same actions and are admitting our own guilt in employing the same tactics. Finally, I just gotta say, im truely confused. Do you know someone who works for Haliburton? why in the name of all thats holy would you or ANY third party defend them? poignant points chains.
_____________________________
One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish
|