SweetDommes -> RE: Being a slut (7/12/2005 9:11:53 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Youcantmakemeeee Hmm, SweetDommes, you might be right. I don't know. However, IMHO, I see the word 'dominant' or 'submissive' or the like to be both a title and a description depending on how it's used. But whether that's true or not, I wonder about something else. If you are a Domme, would you still be a Domme if you had no sub/slave? That title is still true whether you act upon it or not, right? So, if that's the case, then isn't it possible to be a slut and not be acting upon it? Oh dear, I feel I'm rambling. Someone stop me! <smiles> Respectfully, C. At this point, with or without a sub, I have earned the title from many people - in fact, this screen name was given to the two of us by one of our friends (and many have concurred with his opinion). However, personally, I don't feel like a Domme when I don't have a sub - I am still dominant, but a Domme? Nope. quote:
ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 I just know too many monogamous people who have diseases and pregnancies. I know those people too - and in my experience, 70% or more of them are either not really monogamous (or weren't in the past) or chose to pair with someone who isn't/wasn't and whichever one it was, wasn't careful at some point.
|
|
|
|