Youcantmakemeeee
Posts: 36
Joined: 7/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SweetDommes quote:
ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 For me slut is about ATTITUDE, not actions. A virgin can be a slut. A monogamous married woman can be a slut. I can be a slut even if I don't have any sex at all for 8 months. It's not about being horny, it's about having an attitude towards sex and sexuality of openness, freedom, joy, the DESIRE to express sexuality in as many ways and means with others as possible, with absolutely no shame or regret, loving the act of sex and the dance of sexuality for its own sake. And this would prove that we do, indeed have different definitions of the word "slut" - to me, it's a combination of the actions and the attitude. Without the action, it's just a person who is in tune with him/herself and their own sexuality - to me, what you describe is not a slut. I accept and understand that is what you mean when you use it, but please do not get upset with me when I use my definition (which I gave earlier) and talk about possible contamination of the plumbing. Hmm, I'm not quite sure whether the term slut could be just the attitude or if it also needs the action. I think of the word submissive and how I see that. I have known I was submissive more than half my life, but the question is, was I submissive before I actually had that first experience. Can someone be submissive and not be someone's submissive? Can someone be dominant and not be someone's Dom/me? I would say yes to those, and if I said yes to those, would logic suggest that I would have to also agree that someone could be a slut without actually going out and doing it? What do y'all think? C.
_____________________________
"Then he said my name, ..., and I understood what gives cats the urge to purr."
|