tinkJH
Posts: 180
Joined: 5/22/2005 Status: offline
|
I had permission to post it. :) That is why I did. The article did not adress simple having had more then 100 partners. It addressed a Master/Mistress allowing many people, at one time, to sexually use the slave, how well the Master was able to protect the slave, by allowing this, from STD's or other illnesses. Someone not using a condom, broken condoms.. This comment was adressing to a website that the slave proclaimed her Master liked for others to use her. All the other needed do was contact her master and he would arrange for the person to visit her home, a hotel, or she could go to them, and her Master would not attend. That plainly, while maybe not directly abuse, can lead to it. Allowing others to use a slave is one thing - but setting it to a situation to where she is unsafe is abuse. Also, the comment about sleeping. It wasnt about blankets and bugs. It was about the Master/Mistress assuring that proper conditions were met to how they were requiring the slave to sleep. This also addressed from the same site above, the woman claimed that she was forced to sleep on the cold, bare wooden floor with no allowance of a blanket or pillow. It might not be abuse, but its also not a proper treatment. Yes, perhaps the examples weren't the greatest and perhaps poorly explained, especially since it didn't mention the site to which the author was refering to when writing this. But, the final statement of the article, I think, sums up the definition of slave abuse very well. "If the master is not ensuring that the slaves health and safety is in the utmost interest, then its abuse. This means reguardless of what the master wants, reguardless of how bad he wants it, and reguardless of how much or little it may or may not turn him on, if he is not thinking of his slave safety before his own desires, he is abusing his slave."
|