RE: Slave for hire!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


KnightofMists -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/28/2007 7:46:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nottalking

Ok I'm a "vanilla" as this group calls my sexual preference. I was invited to read the post on here, to better understand this side of a person that I wanted to know. After a lot of reading of not only here, but on bondage.com and several other sites (spent the afternoon) there are many things I don't understand. One of them is why a person would subject themselves to pain to please someone. Now I wonder why a person would agree to "rent" themselves out as well.


My post is inspired by that of Nottalking but it does not address her or him.

I'm pleased that this contribution was dropped into this thread (most of it would have fit as well in any number of other threads.)

Nottalking seems to be a person with little or no experience with or exposure to BDSM who--accordingly--has little understand. Unsuprising and unobjectionable, in my view.

What I do find objectionable are comments seemingly loaded with some sort of moral indignation: "Why would ANYone EVER do something like that (i.e something the writer happens not to prefer) with someone they value?"

How often is this question put in reference to bondage, sadomasochism, power exchange of this sort or that, by people with no experience or exposure to BDSM?

Most of us have some experience with bondage and/or S/M and or power-exchange, etc. We can generaously make allowances for the lack of understanding and empathy on the part of clueless vanillas, if we choose to, and I usually try to.

But look, the things most of *us* are experienced with are things which most non BDMSers would probably describe as somewhere between inappropriate and beyond abhorrent as ways to interact with one whom you value.

The clueless vanilla who abhors the activities which you and your partner(s) share has a good excuse for his or her ignorance and narrowness. And one of them who admits this ignorance (in the strict sense of lack of knowledge) and comes here to see whether this might be worth learning about, well I count that person laudable.

On the other hand, if you, for instance, enjoy binding or administering pain to or dominating someone you value, I suggest that you suffering from a failure of both imagination and human empathy if you can't find some less negative response than "abhorrence" for an activity which two or more responsible adults engage in consensually and personally find meaning and fulfillment it.

Even if that happens to be hiring out.

As other have mentioned, hiring out needn't involve money and it needn't involve sex. All sorts of hiring goes on in the world in terms of barter or trade-in-kind, among other possibilities. SOme of those possibilities include what we might call pro-bono work (Ron, please insert quip about the pro and the bone here).

Those who centered their responses on jumping to conclusions about sex and money are failing to consider a tremendously broad range of options. That said, hiring out might indeed involve money or sex or both. If it does it might be nothing more than straight-up prostitution or it might be far more, and far more meanigful to the people involved than mere prostitution--just a whack on the ass between you and your "one" may mean a whole lot more to each of you than the mere physics and biology of a hand meeting a heinie at speed.

I'm grateful to all who have shared their views in this thread but most especially to those including Padraig and that pixie-ish looking girl who demonstrated the ability to walk a little way in another person's shoes before dolloping out the moral indignation.


To put a finer point on it I'd like to offer a rhetorical questions about how it is that to beat, slice and burn one's partner might either be heinous or be an lovely expression of care,depending on the context, whereas to "hire her (or him) out" is necessarily a hateful thing?

Maybe your kink is wax play and your neighbor's is hiring out.

Do we hafta be hating on other people's fully consensual kinks?

I mean there are potential kinks that I'm very happy to hate on. I'm all in favor of being judgemental. I just think we we should use some judgement about just what we're gonna be judgemental about.

Activities I'm likely to condemn don't tend to be between healthy consenting adults, and missturbation has never struck me as less healthy than the norm around here.

Your thoughts?




Great post Noah..

and really liked what Padraig posted in this thread as well.

To the shoe girl that is scared of spiders... I hope it works out well for you...

But alas... all I can say.. is I have been known to give my slaves for the use of others...   Now  here I see that you can Hire them out!!! well shit  .... I lost alot of coin!!!! here!!!...

ROB!!!.. Payment is the saw!!!!!  *G*   No more freebies... I found out that I can hire her out!!!




lighthearted -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/28/2007 9:25:45 PM)

I've been away from the boards for a little while and I missed all the fun...dang!

for the record, even tho I am generally loathe to post on threads that have gone on this far, I'm one of those gals who will be jealous of you, miss t.

but, what I really want to know is, please, BoiJen, can I use this in my sig line?  puleeeze?  I just love it!

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

As for the crazy fuckers on the board freakin out over shit...well whatever.





BoiJen -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/28/2007 10:51:06 PM)

you are more than welcome to use that as your line...hell I use the title of a song I like to play to




lighthearted -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/29/2007 8:11:34 AM)

excellent...thanks!




denika -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/30/2007 2:40:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists


ROB!!!.. Payment is the saw!!!!!  *G*   No more freebies... I found out that I can hire her out!!!



I'll make sure I pass that on to him. He might try and work out a trade system with you tho *s*

denika




KnightofMists -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/30/2007 3:40:38 PM)

payment plans will be considered!!




denika -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/31/2007 10:48:40 PM)

Rob has two questions:

1. How long will you keep the saw?

2. and do I have to pay extra if she does the reno's too?

:)    I may have to keep her for a while.......   Have you seen what denika is like with a hammer??!


Rob




CuriousLord -> RE: Slave for hire!! (8/31/2007 11:09:38 PM)

This thread's been around for a long time.  Which, I've been sort of betting with myself on.  The mods on these boards seem to be pretty good about knocking threads about illegal topics..
quote:

ORIGINAL:  Section guidelines

Subjects which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities.


And.. well, prostitution is a "criminal activity".

Not that I'm saying this thread should be pulled.. but I'm.. just surprised it hasn't been, and the confusion's gotten to me a bit.




Aswad -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 12:23:04 AM)

Prostitution is not necessarily a criminal activity. Nor is anyone seriously soliciting or inciting, so it's a moot point.

And if you analyze the reasons for having that TOS clause, it will become apparent why it is being selectively enforced.

That it is being selectively enforced is to their credit: protecting a great community site from litigation and other showstoppers.




CuriousLord -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 12:35:02 AM)

Yeah, it does make sense.  I was just under the apparent misimpression that enforcement was a bit more strict.  I kept betting on how many hours, then days, that this thread would last, or if it'd remain.  I suppose dwelling on it begins to negate the particular mitigating aspects of this thread.

Nice Jiddu Krishnamurti quote in the signature, btw.




Aswad -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 9:30:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

Yeah, it does make sense.  I was just under the apparent misimpression that enforcement was a bit more strict. [...] I suppose dwelling on it begins to negate the particular mitigating aspects of this thread.


Basically, this thread is- if we disregard the "occasional" blemish- a good example of a kind of thread we need more of: something that deals with difficult and/or poorly understood topics in a manner that, along with dispelling some of the misunderstandings around it, is showing those who haven't posted about it that "no, you're not the only one".

Banned topics are usually banned in order to give the moderators leeway in protecting the forum from litigation and criminal charges, without lots of complaints about how it is inappropriate to delete threads or whatever, thus preserving the community with a minimum of hassle. Debating the ethics of something, or its legalization, is usually not criminal.

As for prostitution, there was a thread on it a little while back which covered it pretty well.

quote:


Nice Jiddu Krishnamurti quote in the signature, btw.


Thanks.




slavegirljoy -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 9:45:48 AM)

It's not a crime to discuss the issues of "prostitution", which hiring out a slave might or might not be considered, depending on the particular local and state laws where it's taking place.  And, that's what's taking place here, a discussion.  To outlaw or forbid the discussion of a "criminal activity" would be in violation of the First Amendment.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David
_________________________________________
"Well, y'all know we all evolve at our own pace."

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

This thread's been around for a long time.  Which, I've been sort of betting with myself on.  The mods on these boards seem to be pretty good about knocking threads about illegal topics..
quote:

ORIGINAL:  Section guidelines

Subjects which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities.


And.. well, prostitution is a "criminal activity".

Not that I'm saying this thread should be pulled.. but I'm.. just surprised it hasn't been, and the confusion's gotten to me a bit.




SmokingGun82 -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 10:07:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slavegirljoy

To outlaw or forbid the discussion of a "criminal activity" would be in violation of the First Amendment.



Not true. If the government was to do so it'd be a violation of the first ammendment (Edited to add: in most cases). A privately owned/operated company/message board/etcetera can essentially do whatever they want in terms of restricting speech.




slavegirljoy -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 10:50:30 AM)

Okay, then why are we allowed to discuss the issues of "slavery", which is a "criminal activity" in this country?  What's the difference between discussing slavery and discussing prostitution?  Oh, and i think beating someone might be considered a criminal activity, too, and we freely discuss that issue on this board, also. 
 
Like Aswad has said, there hasn't been an actual "solicitation" made, so where's the crime?  We're just having a discussion.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David
____________________________________
"I'll go stand in the corner later for my punishment." 
"I'm not very good at giving myself punishment."


quote:

ORIGINAL: SmokingGun82

quote:

ORIGINAL: slavegirljoy

To outlaw or forbid the discussion of a "criminal activity" would be in violation of the First Amendment.



Not true. If the government was to do so it'd be a violation of the first ammendment (Edited to add: in most cases). A privately owned/operated company/message board/etcetera can essentially do whatever they want in terms of restricting speech.





SmokingGun82 -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/1/2007 11:47:24 AM)

I wasn't saying it shouldn't be ok to talk about... just that if it is ok, it's not because of the first ammendment.

Personally, I think it's ridiculous that there's anything "off limits" to talk about. But that's just my opinion.




SirStephan55 -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/3/2007 7:19:42 PM)

I do share her selectively and we BOTH enjoy it very much - but not "rent" - and I am ALWAYS present.




LDRandAstarte -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/4/2007 9:23:26 PM)

Yes quite a few years ago, I rented a slave to a very good and trusted friend whom I trusted with my own life should it come to that.
The terms were very simple. Do with her what ever you like, cause her no lasting harm, have her back at my house by midnight, and pay me a meatball hogie and a bottle nesquick chocolate milk.
The slave did not know the rate she was being rented out for, she just know she was to consider his commands to be mine for the evening.
Of course I was repaying him for renting his wench to me a few months earlier, when I wanted to strut them both around the Folsom Street Fair on leashes and some fun that night in the hotel, the rate for that rental was a ride to and from San Francisco for the Folsom Street Fair.




Nottalking -> RE: Slave for hire!! (9/10/2007 10:12:04 AM)

Thank you all for your input, both positive and negitive. The person that I prompted me to go onto this site has since closed his profile on this site as well as other dating sites. We talk daily even though we are a 100+ miles apart. We will continue to see each other as time allows. Right now he brightens my day, everyday. He thinks I'm "perfect" (his words) just the way I am. So to me that is all that really matters.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875