SirDraco7
Posts: 108
Joined: 8/7/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mstrjx I'm not a fan of blocking. Not for me, mind you, I couldn't possibly have such a need. I guess I should say I'm not a fan of advising someone to block. Once you've done the diplomatic thing of responding to an initial email, and yes I think that is a rarer thing these days than it should be, your obligations are up. At the same time, you don't wish to provoke needless animosity. If another email from an 'undesireable' comes in, you could block it, you could delete it unread, or you could open it and read it or not. Not responding, I think, is fine at that point, but blocking, in my opinion, sends out a very negative message. Since you aren't able to judge the motivations of the other person, you don't know whether you end up provoking a stalker who now seeks revenge. Say what you will, but why make an unknown person more determined to cause harm because of something you feel is an 'innocent' spurning. I understand and agree to a point. However this topic and this post is concerning after diplomatic methods have been exausted. Nobody(I don't think) is saying or sugguesting to e-mail "no thanks" and then block them giving them no chance to reply one way or another. When I say block I mean after the no thanks has been given, yet they continue to ask and bug away. At such point in time you have no choice but to block them. That or just ignore and delete their e-mails as they come in which can be and would be annoying and frustrating. As such a point in time if someone is going to be unreasonable the same way, be it by being blocked, or by being deleted and ignored. One way is just less annoying than the other I think.
|