domiguy -> RE: "Love Reign O'er Me" (9/2/2007 10:43:57 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bobkgin quote:
ORIGINAL: velvetears quote:
ORIGINAL: FullCircle People do apparently selfless acts no one is selfless i agree no one can ALWAYS be selfless, ... Velvet, They are confusing self-denial for selfless. Selfish focuses on the self Selfless focuses on both self and others. Self-denial focuses only on others. They've set up a straw man definition for "selfless", borrowing from an extreme definition for "self-denial", and claiming no one can match the definition they've borrowed thus no one can be "selfless". It is not impossible to focus on both self and others all the time. It is just not a very easy accomplishment to achieve. On edit for Charlotte: Just read your post. I think this will help answer your concern. You might also look at my more recent posts (starting page 14 or 15, I think) where I address that issue. Yes, I'd call you selfless. You are balancing your needs against those of others, taking both into account. On 2nd edit: Note this is real-world selflessness we're talking about right now. In a selfless master-slave relationship, the selfless slave is trusting in her master to provide what she needs, and a selfless master is trusting his slave to comply with his intstructions that he might get what he needs. You are either a dope or unable to understand the definitions of the words you use to define yourself. "SELFLESS"........Little regards for one's own needs. You are a liar, a user. You are full of nothingness.
|
|
|
|