toservez
Posts: 1733
Joined: 9/7/2006 From: All over now in Minnesota Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Celeste43 quote:
ORIGINAL: RRafe That's very nice-but can you think outside of the box and see how others might relate differently? quote:
ORIGINAL: Celeste43 Without love I can't submit. I certainly couldn't feel the deep need to put someone else's needs first. I'm not sure I can do that as a submissive in a loving relationship. Moreover I'm not sure I should, because if my needs aren't fulfilled then I'm empty and lacking the strength and drive to fulfill someone else's. Did you mean your comment to sound as condescending as it appears? Certainly I can think outside the box but the truth is I am only a flawed human being. If I'm not allowed to sleep, I won't have any energy to run his errands the next day. If I'm not fed or kept dehydrated, ditto. The same for never being allowed to indulge my interests, I would get resentful. If I'm not allowed to talk about problems because he wasn't interested in whether or not I was happy, then I wouldn't have any incentive to try to please him. And more literally, if in an airplane and the oxygen masks came down, I would grab my own before I tried to get his to him, since I would pass out without it and be unable to help either of us. Quite honestly, this whole 'think only of the owner, have no needs, plan to never get anything' reminds me of the man who tried to teach his horse to get by on less and less food. Asked by a friend a month later how it was going, he mourned that he had just trained the horse to work without any food and then it died. He saw no relationship between his actions and the consequences. I love this reply. We see these threads time and time again and I am not complaining but time and time again people are asking for whatever their reasons is basically the same, if you call yourself submissive and more importantly call yourself a slave should you not just only care about your owner and not or be able to not indulge in your desires and needs if they do not concern your owners and whether or not love is part of serving or not. Time and time again you get most people going flat out no and some say yes. No one is right or wrong as all human beings are different. The fact though of these topics if you expect a submissive to dedicate their life to their owner by being in some sort of significant/main relationship at least for that submissive the dominant if has to be concerned and responsible to make sure the submissive’s needs are met. Submissive’s are not special humans and for a percentage these needs include both giving and receiving love, affection and sex. Can you find submissives who do not need these things yes of course you can but the reality of the situation is that is finding a needle in the haystack and just like all other humans our needs and desires are basically the same but slightly different. Submissives and going by the OP definition of a slave it is about putting their owners needs and interests first it does not mean not to have any needs or interests and certainly basic human needs that a major majority have.
_____________________________
I am sorry I do not fit Webster's defintion of a slave but thankfully my Master is not Webster. "Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned." - H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama
|