|
tsherpet -> RE: Are you Psychic and how does this affect your relationships? (9/10/2007 1:29:47 AM)
|
"It's pretty clear that some people on tis thread believe in psychic pheomena. It's clear that you don't. I get that already."
No, you don't get it. It has nothing to do with what I do or do not believe in.
"I just can't believe you really think you're going to change anyone's mind by beating them (figuratively speaking) over the head. Why bother? Everyone has a right to their own opinion "
Why bother? Why bother speaking out against ignorance?
I can't believe you could ask that question.
And while every has the right to their own opinion, they also have a right to an informed opinion.
"Lynne Mc Taggart "
A journalist whose books appear to have nothing to do with science. And I'm not even going to bother with something about a general theory of love. PLEASE learn about marketing.
"try different approaches"
Yes, came4u. Different approaches not old superstitions and dead ends.
"No, not geniuses in my mind. Geniuses because of who they were. DaVinci especially, he is almost the benchmark for genuis. lol BENCHMARK? What planet are you from?"
Earth, how about you? You have made it very clear you have jealousy issue with intelligent people by your descriptions of DaVinci and your ideas about shoe tying and social ineptitude. While you are free to think of DaVinci anyway you want, you could not find any intelligent person who was aware of DaVinci's life who wouldn't call him a genius.
"Oh I see, so you agree that they have not been tested via scientific methods"
Not at all, I merely referred to modern IQ tests. Researching Davincis accomplishments and comparing them to the level of understanding at the time is a scientific investigation, and it does show his genius, just not his exact IQ.
"NO rational person? Sure, there are anti-Davnchi experts out there. My own arguements have nothing to do with huhhh? omg you are a lil errr nutso. "
LOL, you ignore DaVinci's accomplishments and recognised assessments of them, you ignore the english language and make up your own idea of genius, and I'm meant to be nutso?
"You have also reduced all intelligent people to cartoon stereotypes. Jealousy appears to be playing a major factor here?
Cartoons and jealosy? what planet are you from again? "
Yes, you reduced intelligent people to social inept people who can't tie shoes. That is a cartoon stereotype. You could have stolen it straight from the Simpsons. You also reduced genius to mensa level to try and detract from what true genius is.
And that pretty much proves your IQ claim is nothing but bullshit. No one with a 164 IQ would ever use mensa as an example in a discussion about genius. The way average people look at mensa is the way mensa people look at genius.
"Actually both mens accomplishments put them at the level of genius using todays standards.
Show me a report from a major university (modern) to prove that fact. "
LOL, you need a uni report to evaluate their accomplishments? So much for that high IQ. Try several books about both men compared to the level of understanding in their time and what humanity has accomplished since then. Put that IQ of yours to use.
"So you admit that 80 years ago they might be considered genius???"
Well if they are considered genius today, of course they would be considered geniuses in the past. That is obvious.
"I don't 'act' smart here or anywhere. I am smart. "
LOL. Trying to claim a 164 IQ on an internet forum is "acting" smart. And it's pretty bad acting. You can't prove such a claim, and no one can test it, so it is pointless to try and brag about IQ on internet forums. Someone with a 164 IQ would already know that and would never be so dumb.
Also you aren't that smart as you appear to have no idea who DaVinci is. When I referred to him as genius you mentioned the Mona Lisa. Someone with a cartoon network education would only think of the Mona Lisa, someone with a 164 IQ would be aware of so much more.
"I don't need you to confirm that FACT. Actions? and not our claims?? lol, think about that. Do you see me bent over laughing at you? THAT would be an action. "
Actually your posts are your actions. Your posts don't match your IQ claims. And without independant testing your IQ, whatever it is, is just a claim.
"My claim is that you have too much spare time and spend that time being an argumentative b*tch nit-icking a negative for anything that you psychic-LY believe that you are somewhat entitled to respond to. "
Oh, and now the big IQ needs to resort to childish insults? Once again the actions don't match the claims. And I know I am entitled to respond to any thread I want by my membership in this forum.
"you know I ain't gonna tolerate crap from a hypocrite who has limited forum emotion-grasping issues like that person. "
More insults? You do realise they aren't convincing arguements don't you?
"That person has issues and wants to discuss nonsense like this to get a high on an arguement for the sake of one. "
LOL, so facts are nonsense? What I wanted to discuss was the phenomena of claims of psychic abilities. I thought that was what the thread was about?
"Do you think if we ignore him he'll just go away? "
Uh Duh, you might have to actually try ingoring instead of this childish tactic.
Hey I've got an idea, instead of talking about people going away, or insulting them or telling them to piss off, how about we discuss psychic phenomena? Oh that's right, no one wants a discssuion they just want people to say "ohh and ahh and oh how special you are.".
"Or maybe he just needs "
Anyone who thought they were good enough would be welcome to try. But ignorance can never be dominating, so many from this thread would never be able to accomplish the task.
"Can we get a Domme out here to give a cyber-spank? Please??? "
Make sure they are adequately armed for such a task.
"I had hopes when I went to bed last night that I had nudged the topic back closer to where it belonged. But NOOOOO. Tsherpet just couldn't let it go until he sucked every bit of life out of this thread."
Back where it belongs? Isn't it a discussion about psychics?
"Why doesn't my husband tell other people about his abilities? Maybe because he's afraid he'll have to listen to 20 friggin pages worth of lecturing and ridiculing!!!!"
That makes no sense. If he picks a decent person and confirms through testing that he is an actual psychic, he and every other spychic on the planet would never have to be ridiculed again. That's why dodging proving their abilities makes no sense. Proof would stop all ridicule.
"If this thread starts becoming fun"
Oh, you only want fun, what you want to hear, not discussion?
"Kudos to everyone who's managed to hang in there this long. "
Thank you.
"that is not always true.. some do some do not depends on the impression. "
Actually it depends on the believer and what type of ghosts they believe in. Just like psychic powers, it's a very individual thing. Among psychics you will even find those who laugh at telepathy, but believe in talking to the dead, or the other way around. And ghosts have the same problem.
|
|
|
|
