slavegirljoy
Posts: 1207
Joined: 11/6/2006 From: North Carolina, USA Status: offline
|
What you have stated doesn't upset this slave, RRafe. i agree with what you stated. For me, as my Master's property (which i voluntarily became), i gave Him the right to decide how to use me and what purpose i fulfill in His life. This is why it was of utmost importance that i sort through the various offers i received to be enslaved and chose to accept the offer that came from a Master who had a set of personal ethics and had interests, needs, and requirements, etc. that fit with my own and that i could willingly accept as the parameters that i would serve within. my Master didn't club me over the head and force me to be His slave. i came willingly. But, once i accepted His slave collar and His offer to become His property, i handed over to Him all right to make decisions about how i would live from then on, within the terms that were agreed to by Uus before becoming Master and slave. my relationship with my Master is based on my sense of duty and loyalty and commitment to fulfilling my agreement to be His slave for the rest of my life or, until He removes His collar from me and releases me. In addition, my Master meets His responsibility to fulfill the agreement He made to be in charge of me and my life and treat me the way He said He would. As to the question, "Do you feel that a BDSM relationship is different from one that is not BDSM?", i say that every relationship is different, whether it is a BDSM-type or not. For me, BDSM is simply a form of creative expression of my sexuality and there is much more to my relationships than how i express my sexuality. my relationshp with my Master isn't dependent on how i express my sexuality. Although that is a part of Oour realtionship, it isn't the foundation. The foundation for Oour relationship is the power structure and it is up to Him to decide, if, when, and how i express my sexuality. i know that other people consider BDSM to be something other than a form of sexual expression. But, this is how i see it and feel about it. slave joy Owned property of Master David ______________________________________________ "We all evolve at our own pace." quote:
ORIGINAL: RRafe This may upset some people,but I'll say it anyhow. If I really wanted to define an M/s relationship...........it would be from the standpoint of pure objectification. The "slave" would only matter from the standpoint of useage. Morals wouldn't matter much-not would trust or honesty. The owner would have the perogative to treat the property any way his of her whims dictated. Most who claim to be into "M/s" do it from more of an egalitarian method. The slave has rights,the slave has perogatives, yadda yadda yadda...........the same as vanilla. I think this is where so much of the confusion comes from.
|