FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
jaxon, These are the comments you originally made in the thread that I take exception with: quote:
ORIGINAL: jaxnsax ; yet, to state that everyone at some time in their life has told some kind of lie is a generalization that is untrue. How do you know this? You can not judge and label all others by your own standards. There are some out there who actually DO believe that a lie; no matter how small or how innocent; they believe that it is just plain wrong to lie to another person. For whatever reason. And to that degree, they do not tell lies; half-truths, they do not deceive, etc, etc. My observations: to state that everyone at some time in their life has told some kind of lie is a generalization that is untrue This is indeed a generalization, but it is not untrue. It's a fact of human nature. To believe otherwise, while nice, is an idealistic view of human nature that does not comport with reality in experience, or with scientific research. You can not judge and label all others by your own standards. Yes you can. We all do, all the time, without exception or fail. There are some out there who actually DO believe that a lie; no matter how small or how innocent; they believe that it is just plain wrong to lie to another person. For whatever reason. And to that degree, they do not tell lies; half-truths, they do not deceive, etc, etc Sure. I'll agree that there might actually be some people who believe that anything less than "100% truth" is a moral failing (that's actually the Christian ideal). Such a belief is an admirable ideal. A perfection that is never, and can never be lived up to. Whether or not "they do not tell lies; half-truths, they do not deceive, etc, etc" is entirely another question. I suspect that what some of the other posters mean (such as LA) is that they do not intentionally deceive in a manner that will cause harm to others, and in some cases are more forthcoming and make a greater effort to ensure that they make the maximum effort - in spite of their normal human natures - to achieve their ideal. (If it wasn't "in our nature" to manage perceptions, why should this require such effort?) This is admirable, and I do understand them to mean that they believe that they come very close to their ideal. As I've often said in other contexts, their words and actions are probably "close enough for government work". But to honestly ( ) believe they achieve this goal is ... idealistic ... Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|