Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:29:12 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
in his shoes, as a newly elected President, what would you have done to stop 9/11?

Exactly the same, of course: nothing. It would have been inconsistent to have been planning the simulated attack by four supposedly hijacked planes for at least eight years (the first try out and softening up bombing of the WTC) if not longer, to engineer being elected as the president with the purpose of implementing those plans and to then not execute those plans.

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:30:54 PM   
Sinergysdarlin


Posts: 17
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin

sounds like simianboy and his cronies have done all the best for god, country, and the world...any other choices? maybe he will change the laws and run again? it's been soooo successful so far, how about 4 or 12 more years of this?


While I realize you're probably just trying to help your mate in his.. well, I suppose his ego.. Bush and his career aren't the subject, outside of the parts related to the cause of 9/11..

Please, not another "I hate Bush" thread.



i think (notice the use of the word "think") that what was said was that "bush et al" have done "all the best for god, country, and the world." where is the attack or 'i hate bush" part of that? i was suggesting that perhaps he should be granted even more time to work his ways. perhaps you might read the post as it was presented? just a thought.

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:32:56 PM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline

please excuse the last post for being from the wrong poster; i'm still getting used to the boards and their log in procedures. i'm not the brightest one on the block...

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to Sinergysdarlin)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:36:21 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin

sounds like simianboy and his cronies have done all the best for god, country, and the world...any other choices? maybe he will change the laws and run again? it's been soooo successful so far, how about 4 or 12 more years of this?


While I realize you're probably just trying to help your mate in his.. well, I suppose his ego.. Bush and his career aren't the subject, outside of the parts related to the cause of 9/11..

Please, not another "I hate Bush" thread.



i think (notice the use of the word "think") that what was said was that "bush et al" have done "all the best for god, country, and the world." where is the attack or 'i hate bush" part of that?


Pretending the sarcasm isn't an obvious answer, I'd say "simianboy and his cronies" might strike one as slightly hateful.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergysdarlin
 i was suggesting that perhaps he should be granted even more time to work his ways. perhaps you might read the post as it was presented? just a thought.

 
Excuse me for mistaking your post as sarcasm, then.  Again, this isn't the place for unrelated subjects; instead, I'd suggest you make a thread about your approval for Bush's success.

(in reply to Sinergysdarlin)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:39:12 PM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
Sinergysdarlin has a mind of her own, it is a rather boorish tactic to try to minimize what she has to say as "rushing to my defense."  If you cannot play in the big pool, perhaps you should stay in the kiddie pool where you will feel safe in sharing your opinions.


Erm.. please excuse me if thinking your mate joining the debate at the same time on the same thread may've been more than a coincidence.  I can assure you, no offense was intended.


forbit two posters actually responding to the same thread on the same boards...i'll try to keep my postings well apart in the future from anyone who might be construed as having anything to do with me...does that preclude the entire northern hemisphere?

yep, i think "i ain't wastin' time no more" is apt.

enjoy the allman brothers and your evening.

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:43:57 PM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline 		CL: Are you going to contribute to this thread or just nay-say, whinge and instruct us on how to have a discussion?


Z.

PS: Prevent 9/11 - listen to your field agents, not the middle managers who you pay to tell you what you want to hear so you can spin shit into gold for the electorate...

Does that fit your criteria for an appropriate post?


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:44:05 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
Sinergysdarlin has a mind of her own, it is a rather boorish tactic to try to minimize what she has to say as "rushing to my defense."  If you cannot play in the big pool, perhaps you should stay in the kiddie pool where you will feel safe in sharing your opinions.


Erm.. please excuse me if thinking your mate joining the debate at the same time on the same thread may've been more than a coincidence.  I can assure you, no offense was intended.


forbit two posters actually responding to the same thread on the same boards...i'll try to keep my postings well apart in the future from anyone who might be construed as having anything to do with me...does that preclude the entire northern hemisphere?

yep, i think "i ain't wastin' time no more" is apt.

enjoy the allman brothers and your evening.

 
Yeah, I do tend to get confused with two posters, such as, say, Sinergy and Sinergysdarlin, both join in posting to me at about the same time in the same thread on the same side.  While I realize that they both are avid posters, Sinergysdarling having had whole baker's dozen of posts before responding to me on here, I was inclined to believe that they might somehow be correlated.

Again, my apologies.

(in reply to girl4you2)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:47:21 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

CL: Are you going to contribute to this thread or just nay-say, whinge and instruct us on how to have a discussion?


Pretty much just wait for someone to answer my question.  My apologies for not providing a change of subject just yet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee
PS: Prevent 9/11 - listen to your field agents, not the middle managers who you pay to tell you what you want to hear so you can spin shit into gold for the electorate...


Would you mind if I asked for something more specific?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee
Does that fit your criteria for an appropriate post?


Have I declined anything that wasn't either on an unrelated topic?

(in reply to Zensee)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/11/2007 11:51:37 PM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

forbit two posters actually responding to the same thread on the same boards...i'll try to keep my postings well apart in the future from anyone who might be construed as having anything to do with me...does that preclude the entire northern hemisphere?

yep, i think "i ain't wastin' time no more" is apt.

enjoy the allman brothers and your evening.

 
Yeah, I do tend to get confused with two posters, such as, say, Sinergy and Sinergysdarlin, both join in posting to me at about the same time in the same thread on the same side.  While I realize that they both are avid posters, Sinergysdarling having had whole baker's dozen of posts before responding to me on here, I was inclined to believe that they might somehow be correlated.

Again, my apologies.


well, now you've heard from someone with a bit more than a "baker's dozen" worth of posts (which, by the by is usually accepted as 13). enjoy your evening.

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:03:46 AM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2

well, now you've heard from someone with a bit more than a "baker's dozen" worth of posts (which, by the by is usually accepted as 13). enjoy your evening.

 
I appreciate hearing from you, then.

I'd like to point out that, as of this post, she has seventeen posts in total.  Four of which was on this thread.  This would imply that she has a baker's dozen (seventeen minus four equals thirteen) posts before responding on this thread.

(in reply to girl4you2)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:16:43 AM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
I appreciate hearing from you, then.

I'd like to point out that, as of this post, she has seventeen posts in total.  Four of which was on this thread.  This would imply that she has a baker's dozen (seventeen minus four equals thirteen) posts before responding on this thread.




perhaps you might have perused the number of her then current posts before you made such a blanket statement. as an aside, do we now take into serious consideration the number of posts before discounting a poster's contributions? would that, taken further, imply that anyone below, say 2000 posts, is to be considered of little to any value? i do await your considered response.

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:20:32 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
Yeah, I do tend to get confused with two posters, such as, say, Sinergy and Sinergysdarlin, both join in posting to me at about the same time in the same thread on the same side.  While I realize that they both are avid posters, Sinergysdarling having had whole baker's dozen of posts before responding to me on here, I was inclined to believe that they might somehow be correlated.
They probably are. His slave under another nick had the same behaviour and was earlier recognized by an astute man as a troll. This new nick is probably owned by the same slave. The behaviour is irritating and her master would be wise to forbid her to post in the same threads that he does and vice versa be wise not to post in the threads in which she posts. On the other hand her popping up in threads in which he posts is slave behaviour (fortunately particular to her) and some allowance for that must be taken into consideration.
 
I considered the troll behaviour insufficient cause for blocking her posts, as she does occasionally have something worthwile to say. The use of a green font, though, may be a cause for me to block her posts. I am still considering the bother that font colour causes me.

< Message edited by Rule -- 9/12/2007 12:24:13 AM >

(in reply to CuriousLord)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:25:15 AM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2


quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord
I appreciate hearing from you, then.

I'd like to point out that, as of this post, she has seventeen posts in total.  Four of which was on this thread.  This would imply that she has a baker's dozen (seventeen minus four equals thirteen) posts before responding on this thread.




perhaps you might have perused the number of her then current posts before you made such a blanket statement. as an aside, do we now take into serious consideration the number of posts before discounting a poster's contributions? would that, taken further, imply that anyone below, say 2000 posts, is to be considered of little to any value? i do await your considered response.

 
I'm not discounting the value of her posts.  I hope it was obvious that my pointing out that she had thirteen posts before engaging in this thread was justifying my assumption that her interest was largely inspired due to her mate's presense here.  I hope you can see how the number of her posts before coming in here were the relevant consideration, and not the number of posts that she had afterwards.

(in reply to girl4you2)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:29:55 AM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline 		Yeah, your analysis strikes me as largely accurate.

Until now, I've been basically disregarding such individuals.  I suppose I wanted to try talking to them slowly, seeing if they had a point, granting them an undeserved level of respect for the sake of barring them from changing the subject by starting an emotionally charged argument in which logic is compromised immediately.  I'm breaking form in saying this, and they're now free to start an argument without making points, effectively changing the subject.

Nonetheless, this isn't a matter.  It's 3:30 AM here, and I need some sleep.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:32:17 AM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

They probably are. His slave under another nick had the same behaviour and was earlier recognized by an astute man as a troll. This new nick is probably owned by the same slave. The behaviour is irritating and her master would be wise to forbid her to post in the same threads that he does and vice versa be wise not to post in the threads in which she posts. On the other hand her popping up in threads in which he posts is slave behaviour (fortunately particular to her) and some allowance for that must be taken into consideration.
 
I considered the troll behaviour insufficient cause for blocking her posts, as she does occasionally have something worthwile to say. The use of a green font, though, may be a cause for me to block her posts. I am still considering the bother that font colour causes me.




i have been on these boards for quite some time, and i have always posted my OWN thoughts and opinions, and will continue to do so no matter what any small minds may think. no allowance need be taken. i am not anyone's slave nor do i plan to be, and nobody would ever deign to "forbid" me to post or have my thoughts on any subject that i might care to comment on.

as kermit once said, "it ain't easy being green."

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:45:38 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: girl4you2
as kermit once said, "it ain't easy being green."

Quite.

< Message edited by Rule -- 9/12/2007 12:46:32 AM >

(in reply to girl4you2)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 12:56:43 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

...the idea behind this thread is to create a space where people who feel uncomfortable with the current zeitgeist surrounding 9/11 can post without offending those who are genuinely upset. Leave those other threads alone if you disagree with the OP, just for once. Post here if you must.



I'm not uncomfortable with people mourning the loss of ones loved ones, what is more natural than that? I am not uncomfortable with the US administration going after the culprits, that is what they should be doing. No one deserves to go about their lawful business and be murdered. No government can stand back and allow such a crime to be committed on its territory.

What I am uncomfortable with is the use of 9/11 by the US administration to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 and cause (mainly indirectly but still caused) the death of thousands of other innocent people. I am uncomfortable with the endless maukish and sentimental public and national memorials which seem to be a political ploy to try and keep people behind the criminal acts of their government.

The Bush administration has used 9/11 to carry on the cycle of violence, to perpetuate terrorism in the world with its simplistic view and its pretence that the America (and the west) are innocent bystanders in a world full of oppression when western policy (now led by America but once by Europe) has caused so much of it.

As far as I'm concerned the US government (and allies) has buried the innocent victims of 9/11 under the innocent victims they have created since that date.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 9/12/2007 12:58:50 AM >

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 1:00:48 AM   
girl4you2


Posts: 1622
Joined: 8/4/2005
Status: offline

what he said (and i'm not meatcleaver's troll, slave, submissive, or publicist).

_____________________________

maireann croí éadrom i bhfad. is maith an scáthán súil charad. is leor nod don eolach.
got shoes?

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 1:34:00 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline 		Various people on CM do have a close connection to the events of 911 and may have pertinent information or be in the position (admittedly at the risk of their own life) to acquire such information, however insignificant the information may seem to be. When such information is not in some way made public on the internet, when names are not being named, the whole truth cannot surface.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers - 9/12/2007 6:09:55 AM   
came4U


Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline 		I am lost

does the guy have 2 gf's that write in green?

lol

9/11? is that the topic? oh man. Sigh, thank God it is over.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: 9/11 non-sympathisers Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094