MasterMagnus321
Posts: 86
Joined: 10/4/2005 Status: offline
|
I think "assertive" is very direct, clear, and unequivocal. More importantly, I think an assertive approach during communication with other humans is born out of having two specific things: 1- a very deep understanding of one's wants, needs, preferences, principles, and values, and 2- complete acceptance of self exactly as one is, and total comfort with all of the abstractions mentioned in #1. I think "aggressive," as you mention, has a tinge of hostility in it. In my opinion, I think aggression is born out of a desperate need to satisfy unfufilled personal needs. By nature, and by definition, the phenomena of "aggression" has an element of antagonism in it. It is a negative, toxic reality. For example, I do not accept tardiness on the part my subs. I clearly tell them being late is simply, and totally, unacceptable to me. I am assertive inasmuch as I take a disciplined, structured, consistent approach, and I do so "proactively," rather that reactively. If a sub is late after that rule is explained (barring unforseen extraordinary circumstances), there will be consequences... that is a given. If a sub is ever late again, I will dismiss her immediately, as that tardiness is something which I choose to not accept. I am neither antagonistic or hostile, I am (very comfortably) consistent. I am assertive in that I explain myself clearly the first time around, I am very in touch with (and accepting of) my self and my desires, and I never disrespect myself or others by breaking my word, especially my word TO myself.
_____________________________
Nothing lasts, and yet nothing passes, either. And nothing passes just because nothing lasts. -Philip Roth ~MASTERMAGNUS
|