submgreenbay -> RE: Does it gotta be humilating? (9/19/2007 6:19:27 PM)
|
I feel the same way. Not real comfortable with it, though I think it can have it's place. quote:
I don't believe that humiliation won't illicit submission from a slave who wants to serve... slaves and submissives want to feel useful. worm boys, sissysluts, dogboys and so on... might need to be humiliated ...to have their useless selfs pointed out and their uselessness proved. I tend to agree with that and this from : http://www.cair4.com/tlesson1.htm For most submissives, humiliation is erotic. Humiliation weakens him, and when he is weaker, he has less willpower and is easier to control. Perhaps the most common kink in submission is the desire to be humiliated. But for the most part it isn't good for him to be weaker, and you don't want him to be weaker. Humiliating a man lowers his self-esteem and feelings of worth. With less self-esteem and worth This is exactly what the submissive wants, because less willpower means less self control and less ability to resist domination. In short, it can be erotic to the submissive. But the loss of self-esteem and worth is bad. Erotic domination is measured by how excited the man is to obey and be controlled. Lifestyle domination is measured by how much he wants to please his Mistress and make her happy. Those are two different things. But if your knight is submissive, and if you can erotically dominate him while being caring, the lifestyle domination will follow. Unfortunately, many of the tricks for erotic domination work against the lifestyle domination. A recurring issue is how to erotically dominate your knight without undermining your lifestyle domination.
|
|
|
|