themischievous1
Posts: 151
Joined: 4/3/2005 From: San Antonio, Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wolfsprincess mischie ... First off, i don't know that marriage would or wouldn't make trust any easier. i've seen people who have been married for YEARS and STILL don't trust one another. i've seen marriages end in divorce and one of the partners walks away "scot-free" while the other doesn't even have a roof over their head. i think it's the PEOPLE who W/we have to base of "trust-ability" on - not the type of relationship it is. The law will provide for the partners in SOME states - but not all, so i'm told. princess "...slave isn't just a word - it's who and what i am ... walking forever in His light and seeking shelter in His shadow" http://absoluteslavery.com http://absoluteslavery.com/secure/forum/ Hi princess :) I agree that in some marriages and for some people, trust might still be an issue but having been married before, there is something about the whole legal process and the exchanging of vows, the ceremony itself, the signing of a legal document, the having to go to court to actually dissolve the union, that makes legal marriage a deeply committed scenario as opposed to just living together, whether in the lifestyle or not. There is the foregone knowledge in a couple's mind that there will be legalities involved when separating property, assets, possessions, as well as potential child or spousal support if things don't work out. All of these things offer a degree of security, which establishes trust for women and men who marry these days, even for those who can't afford a good attorney. Certainly, there are countless horror stories that can be supplied where the legal system didn't work to the benefit of one spouse or another, but for the majority I think there is the chance that things will be resolved at least somewhat fairly and reasonably. Without any kind of legal protection via just living together, one must completely trust that one's owner is going to be decent if she/he wants out or is released. I just see the necessary trust factor as being more difficult for unmarried property versus being the legal spouse in a TPE relationship that is absolute in nature. Those who are currently legally married, or who have experienced marriage, may have felt what I've felt in the past before divorce. There was a strange bond automatically present. This marriage bond is accepted and still revered by mainstream society. There is something deeply special in the words "my wife/ my husband." Most of us, even in the varying facets of the lifestyle, still respect and hold these titles to be reverent. Personally, to be property to a particular owner as well as his cherished wife is the best of both worlds from my point of view, but then this is just my own opinion as it relates to me and my life. For me, the security is greater, and making it "legal" means something beyond just living together. It speaks of a commitment made that says that an owner thinks enough of me as his property to title me as and make me his legal wife. I just think trust would come about much more easily in such a scenario versus living together. I know my pov doesn't apply to all and some TPE couples or poly families are quite content just to live together, feeling that trust and commitment are more internal issues and that legality has nothing to do with them. In terms of the trust factor though, I continue to feel it would be much easier to completely surrender everything in absolute fashion to one's owner/legal spouse versus someone one just lives with. As absolute surrender is primary in an absolute relationship, absolute trust is a must. Maybe I'm still hanging onto vanilla thinking in this regard of seeing marriage as a more trustworthy, stable situation and commitment to completely surrender under... I'm not sure. I only know I currently view it as such, though I'm certainly open to other points of view and knowledge. mischie
|