EPGAH
Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael I may be a bleeding heart liberal but my plan for Afghanistan would have been to arrange for accidents for all the first born sons of the warlords. I would then have taken the second born sons and whispered in their ears to look at their younger brother and imagine him running things instead. Let them know what we expect of them, how much opium they could grow, how much they could steal of US aid, etc. I would also inform them of how many girls would be allowed to go to school, how much money would have to trickle down to their people etc. I would also have brought huge numbers of their families to the US to study as well. I would have taken huge numbers of people from various government entities and brough them here to work and learn alongside their equals in our government and of course to corrupt them with walmart, costco, and god knows what else. Anyone who gets too far out of line falls out of the airplane on the way back and the warlords know that a large number of their family members are attending schools at every large city in the US. Of course they wouldn't be hostages or insurance against terror attacks as America would never do such a thing, or would we? LOL, that's a great--and EFFECTIVE plan--and that's EXACTLY why it didn't happen that way: Taking enemies hostage is considered "beneath us" somehow...Killing "civilians" who "happen" to be packing assault-rifles is similarly frowned upon...So is torture, but somehow, our wee grunts thought up such elaborate torture schemes, AND acquired all the equipment to do so--in the military's supply-chain whose inefficiency is legendary? Something wrong there! Heck, when we deported illegals by plane, we landed before pushing them out...so they hopped back in--to America! Napalm wasn't used because it was a CRUEL weapon, it was used because it was an EFFECTIVE weapon...and so on...We limit our OWN capabilities, far more than they could ever do!
|