kc692 -> RE: Problems with liking an older mistress (10/20/2007 9:52:00 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jmasterson quote:
ORIGINAL: RumpusParable You're doing the same with other female's posts in this thread that don't tell you what you want to hear. No one said that simply considering yourself attractive is wrong, no one said that addressing your interests was wrong, but you decided to pretend that that is what they said instead of them talking about HOW you addressed these matters in your profile and how it comes across. Ok, let me address this entire statement: I never said that anybody said that me considering myself attractive was wrong, so I don't know where that came from. What I did say is that people seem to take issue with that fact that I express that I think that I am attractive. And I agreed with them that I may have came off as cocky in how I expressed that that, and I said that I decided to change my profile because of that. But I did also say that I didn't think it was as big of a deal as people were making it out to be. Now for the second part of your entire statement: People may have not directly said that addressing my interests was wrong, but they did object to me listing and describing them, such as here: quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse "I am especially into face sitting, ass worship, wrestling, watersports, etc.........you get the picture" = Again, this reads as DO ME, not what you can do FOR ME. Around here I have recently learned that "do me" has a negative connotation, so this statement apparently objects to my listing my interests. Perhaps you think I should be more subtle about it, I don't know. I chose to be direct and simply list what I am into, but around here apparently that leads people to give me the lable of "do me", which obviously has a bad connotation. So this leaves me wondering, what would you people consider to be a proper way to address my interests? I really don't know why people have a problem with my directness about it, why mince words? As for my other post that was mainly in response to your first reply, I don't think I took anything out of context. I responded to the areas of your post that I either disagreed with or that I thought needed some explaining on my part. For example, I responded to your line about my bisexuality because I thought it was important that people understood that the line about me being picky was only for guys. You seemed to think that my using the word picky made me sound pompous. I know that most people are picky, but I thought that my pickiness towards guys needed emphasis because I AM very choosy with guys. Its not because I think that I am super good looking but its because of the nature of my sexuality that makes me exceptionally choosy with guys. Anyway, Rumpus, I am wondering if you think that me showing my naked chest on my profile made me seem immature. quote:
There are ways to address all the things you discuss in your profile that do not sound so vaguely or (again trying to be clear) making it feel reasonable to wonder if you've ever sent or used a penis photo as a way of meeting someone online. Well incase you did start to wonder no, I don't send penis pics (unless requested). Since I'm bi I have a profile on another website and I hate it when people send penis pics or have that for their profile pic... everyone has a cock, I want to see the rest of a person. Just felt like adding that. ;) Keep thinking that it is not a big deal that your interests are at the forefront and that doesnt impact your profile negatively, that is your right. You are totally correct in that the fact you do not talk about anything else but those interests show exactly where they lie, (and where they do not, for example intelligence, etc). I'm with you....since you argued with the women that were trying to help you and tell you from the exact gender you were asking for input from, what their opinion was....keep that profile exactly the same!![;)] It will tell all the older women you seek exactly where your head(s) (both of em) truly are at, and save them from wasting a lot of time, that is unless they for some reason think your boy toy ass is better than the other boy toys... edited to add: we really need to get a choice for bottom instead of sub. There is nothing wrong with being a bottom, but that is what you are my boy, not a submissive. Again nothing wrong with that, but **shrugs** good luck to you, I wish you the best finding what you term a femdom that is interested in that.
|
|
|
|