toservez
Posts: 1733
Joined: 9/7/2006 From: All over now in Minnesota Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Blaakmaan quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule First of all I agree with previous posters: the master has to utilize the innate abilities and preferences of the submissive or slave. According to my hypotheses: The slave is an extension of the master and wants and needs to obey. If the master sees an opportunity that his slave has the innate ability, education and preference to accomplish, he can command her to do so. For example she may have potential as a fashion model and he then can direct her to inquire how to become a fashion model and command her to act as required to achieve that result. The slave is controlled, as the master is fully responsible for her. The submissive is not an extension of her master. She wants not to obey, but to work. She also may be directed by her master to accomplish a task, but she does not respond to his control, but to his desire. Control is secondary. Now, that's a very interesting theory! Very, very interesting! Do others agree with the distinctions that the poster has made? A submissive is not an extension of her Dom/Master, does not want to obey but to work, and does not respond to his control but his desire? A slave is an extension of her master, and wants and needs to obey? Don’t disagree in theory but not realistic when taking into account the reality of a human being 24/7/365 days a year. I am my own human being, not an extension. It is just too simplistic and unrealistic to go a slave has no identity until their owner gives them one which is what this describes. It has a base level of a slave being weak, directionless and naïve that only their owner can direct them in their life. I am a fully formed human being equal to every one else in the world in capabilities. As a slave I want to naturally put all of his needs, desires and wants above mine but I am human and I will have needs, desires and wants besides his. It still is compatibility and the two people filling each other’s needs and hopefully many desires and wants. To get pulled into a sub/slave definition war, slaves to me it is too simplistic to say we want to obey. That is not it. We want to please, pleasure and help the one we choose to be owned by. So they being pleased and their own pleasure is what feeds my own. To me a submissive is about doing things in the relationship that bring them direct pleasure which can also be many mundane things and not just bedroom play. Obeying as a general theme really has nothing to do with it outside of a means and byproduct.
_____________________________
I am sorry I do not fit Webster's defintion of a slave but thankfully my Master is not Webster. "Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned." - H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama
|