aidan
Posts: 904
Joined: 5/28/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Ah,.........people, I hate to break this to you but "Harry Potter" is a work of fiction. All the people in the movie were actors. There is no "Dumbledor". Enjoy your textbooks! Anyway... While it's irrelevant (somewhat) that Dumbledore is gay, that fact that he loved is not. The Harry Potter series is, in her words, "a prolonged argument for tolerance" and the unifying ability of love in all its forms (fraternal, sibling, parental, romantic). For Dumbledore to love is very important, because how can he fight for it so powerfuly if he's not touched by it? Who Dumbledore loves is also important, but not in the sense that you might think. The object of Dumbledore's love was his friend Grindlewald, who in many ways stood as an opposite to him (whereas Voldemort stands as the opposite of Harry). Grindelwald's agenda of bigotry and subjugation, even if under benign auspices, goes against everything that Dumbledore believes. Blinded by anger over what was done to his sister and his love for the only man who seems to understand him, Dumbledore ignores this for as long as he can. In the end, it's a story of tragic love. Again, from Rowling herself: quote:
Dumbledore fell in love with Grindelwald, and that that added to his horror when Grindelwald showed himself to be what he was. To an extent, do we say it excused Dumbledore a little more because falling in love can blind us to an extend, but he met someone as brilliant as he was, and rather like Bellatrix he was very drawn to this brilliant person, and horribly, terribly let down by him. Imagine how supremely disappointed, how hurt, how broken-hearted Dumbledore must have felt when he comes to realize the man he loves might be a monster. He goes on then to dedicate the rest of his life to repenting for his mistakes, for Grindelwald and his sister. It's the relationship between these two characters that provides Dumbledore's motivation throughout the series. Now, why wasn't it made explicit that his was a romantic relationship with Grindelwald? Well, my question to that is: how could she do it? How could Dumbledore's past romance have been shoehorned into the series without it seeming gratuitous? The only logical thing I can think of is Rita Skeeter "outing" him after death, and that provides some nasty subtext that it was "wrong". The only reason it came out now is because somebody asked, and she gave the honest answer. Going back and reading the relevant chapters, you can see the subtext of the romance pretty well. The fact that he loved: important. The fact that he was gay: irrelevant. It's a nice bit of information that gives some deeper insight into a beloved character. Nothing more, really.
_____________________________
Do what now? "I aim to misbehave." -Mal Reynolds
|