|
Real0ne -> RE: zeitgeistmovie (10/24/2007 8:03:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967
I have hi-speed, and I have watched and read your "evidence". I have also watched and read "evidence" debunking your "evidence".
I really want to know how the fuck this inept administration has all the sudden become so brilliant, and competent enough that they could cover up an event of this maganitude?
If they could cover this up, why couldn't they plant wmd's in Iraq?
How can they cover up the WTC atrocity, but can't stop former Generals from speaking out against Iraq, wouldn't they let them in on your little secret?
How did they pull this off in the first 8 months in office, but fuck up every other policy they implimented since?
Why hasn't a legitimate co-conspirator come forward, one with real proof?
Real proof has been given to us many times.
The head of the commission caught NORAD and the FAA single handedly in lies but no one prosecuted them.
What possible reason would any "co-conspirator" raise their hand and announce they blew up the wtc?
If you cheated on your taxes would you jump up raise your hand and say hey irs come and get me i admit it!!
The links I have provided have never been debunked, (within reason), by anyone on any board i am on or on any site unless you want to believe bombs arent bombs, the laws of physics can be defied, and planes simply evaporate into thin air.
Usually in the course of a debate people come to terms with that.
Sometimes people expect miracles from alternative theory people as if we are supposed to have all the answers before a litgitimate investigation is done as if we are expected to be gods of some sort and have every possible question someone could ask answered when all we want is a ligitimate independent investigation.
The links that I provided show that the media falsified the event, and I forgot to put up the ones where both cnn and the bbc announced the demolition of wtc7 claiming the building had already fallen when you can see it the background. Its nearly a comedy show because they point to standing right there on film and say it collapsed 15 minutes before it actually and they in both cases quick cut to commercial. If it wasnt so sad it would be hilarious.
So we have physics being defied in many instances.
Norad and the faa caught in lies by the commission
Senators that believe and argue for an investigation.
Silverstein caught in a lie, the state supporting his lie.
Videos that is non news media videos that corroborate the firemens stories and much of the news media that bombs were used.
Private videos that show actually bombs exploding.
FEMA, NIST, ASCE, (government investigators), none of them even mention bombs or any testing to see if bombs were used.
There are several more people who have been caught in lies, which is how most conspiracies come to the surface.
Personally i stick with what is called empirical evidence and that is what I do not need anyones testimony to figure out as it is clear no one can be trusted.
The reason you dont have the proof you want is that the truth you want is there but it has simply been ignored as "coincidences", "oversights", "failure to perform", "was looking in the other direction at the time" all sells quite easily to the general public who are much to busy keeping up with inflation to really sit down and police the government.
|
|
|
|
