Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 2:38:49 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
You mean (gasp) the dreaded H-word? That hated epithet drenched with centuries of history of the deprivation and persecution of the white majority population?

The people who were forced to sit at the front of the bus?

The ones who have usually been the only ones allowed to govern and often vote in the US?

The ones who can't even hang the odd attractive noose-type decoration here and there without becoming the subjects of opprobrium?

How can you even think such a word?

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 3:56:41 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

I admit to being negative, but I don't think of myself as racist. Remember, the Internet (Insert Al Gore joke here), telephone, television, and in large part, radio are American inventions.


As i told you on a previous thread, Telephones were invented in Germany, the guy called his machine a telephon. The internet was invented by Tim Berners Lee and the Televison by John Logie Baird who are both British. I am not sure why you persist in saying America invented just about everything, unless its to try and substantiate the rest of your posts.

(in reply to EPGAH)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 3:57:50 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
HONOLULU - Television bounty hunter Duane "Dog" Chapman's son taped a private phone conversation in which the reality star used a racial slur repeatedly, then sold it to a tabloid for "a lot of money," Chapman's lawyer said Thursday.

"I guess because of whatever level of anger he had of his father, he felt the need to express it in that manner," attorney Brook Hart told The Associated Press.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071102/ap_on_en_tv/people_duane_chapman

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 7:11:51 AM   
camille65


Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline
That's some serious anger there. I don't think I could ever do something like that to my father no matter the problem.I wonder if he really understood the ramifications of sending in that tape?

_____________________________


~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).




(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 7:26:19 AM   
EPGAH


Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
I admit to being negative, but I don't think of myself as racist. Remember, the Internet (Insert Al Gore joke here), telephone, television, and in large part, radio are American inventions.

As i told you on a previous thread, Telephones were invented in Germany, the guy called his machine a telephon. The internet was invented by Tim Berners Lee and the Televison by John Logie Baird who are both British. I am not sure why you persist in saying America invented just about everything, unless its to try and substantiate the rest of your posts.

Telephone: http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bltelephone.htm
Elisha Gray and Alexander Graham Bell, both AMERICAN.
Internet, you are half correct...DARPA started the research, but Berners-Lee DID invent the WWW!...Still, most of the groundwork was done by DARPA (The ARPANET) and MIT... "Brief" History of the Internet (They have a much different idea of "brief" than mine): http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.shtml
Still, the "backbone" servers are located in Virginia...and even this long-winded "brief" article says that Berners-Lee worked from MIT...assuming they're using the standard abbreviation, that is Massachussetts Institute of Technology!
Television--Timeline:
http://inventors.about.com/od/tstartinventions/a/Television_Time_2.htm
Shows the "evolution" of the television, from a short-range "toy" to a long-distance transmission...The first long-distance transmission was by Bell Telephone in 1927, and the patent was filed by Philo Farnsworth! (An American, and the first TV-hater! "There's nothing on it worthwhile, and we're not going to watch it in this household, and I don't want it in your intellectual diet." - Philo Farnsworth's feelings about watching television.) John Logie Baird opened the first "real" TV station, yes, but NOT the first TV!
Please note I have avoided using Wikipedia articles, so as to avoid "inaccuracy"!

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 7:34:22 AM   
diaperboy99


Posts: 19
Joined: 4/13/2007
Status: offline
Dear oh dear. Are you so ignorant that in addition to your racist rants, you think America invented everything.....

The Internet was invented at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), in Switzerland.

TV was invented by John Logie Baird in Scotland

Radio was invented by either Marconi (Italian) or Tesla (Croatian) depending on your definition of radio or radio waves.

The telephone was invented by Alexander Graham Bell in Scotland

You are the sort of American that gives the rest a bad name..... a bit like G W Bush

(in reply to EPGAH)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 8:14:59 AM   
EPGAH


Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
At risk of sounding childish, I provided proof for mine, where's yours?
But the point of the above was not who invented what, but that America has "only" been around for 231 years (Counting 1776 as the start date), and we've ONLY had those 231 years to make OUR country the way WE want...The area we now know as Mexico was conquered in 1521, and became a separate nation in 1821...So they've had, depending which you count as the start-date, either 486 years or 186 years to make THEIR country the way THEY want. (This sidesteps/ignores the Aztec/Maya/Toltec empires, who were around for a long time before, but yielded to superior firepower of the Spanish invaders)
Somehow our way--whether or not it's the "best" aside--is sufficiently BETTER, that we have an 8-digit number of invaders from Mexico--who then turn around and demand we do things THEIR way! Which would be, quite literally, destroying the very superiority they came to live off of!
This should be a separate thread: Why should America change for invaders who came over here just to take advantage of our "superior" economy? (Or should that be our "superior" welfare systems?)

P.S. Apologies, you are partly correct, Marconi DID invent the first "true" wireless radio, although Tesla had done most of the work in 1890's in a New York laboratory. New York is still part of the US, I believe...

< Message edited by EPGAH -- 11/2/2007 8:19:35 AM >

(in reply to diaperboy99)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 10:22:04 AM   
Researcher


Posts: 3
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
Interesting media storm over this. My first reaction was also one of questioning the publicity stunt aspect of this, given the far-overhyped media response to anything even vaguely racial. 

Secondly, after actually *listening* to the tape itself, and hearing the intent of the point Chapman is trying to make, and the logic behind it, it is quite apparant the rant is not based on any kind of racial hatred or white superiority attitude, it is expressing the frustrations of living in a society where anything involving race or minority groups is under a microscope and therefore subject to being blown out of proportion, taken out of context, and being treated with a knee-jerk reaction rather than a real judgement of what was said.
How ironic then, that Chapman caused the very thing he was trying to avoid by expressing concern about his son dating a minority, and the subsequent overhyped response it could cause.

Now, given that... two other things become starkly obvious.

1) the man seriously does need to learn to avoid the racial references... calling somone a ni_ger is extremely disrespectful and downright ugly. There is the asterisk here though (completely lost in the sensationalism of the story I'm sure) that Chapman clarifies his use of the word as not intending any hatred or ill will... he just (rightly) knows that others including the media not understand that, and automatically assume the worst. Anyone who scoffs at this should examine their thoughts of black people calling each other the same word... which seems to be acceptable in general. Personally I have always always believed that if doing a particular thing is acceptable if your skin is black, but doing the exact same thing is not ok if you are of a different race... well, that's the definition of racism to me.

And finally,2) and this is by far the most important point to me... is how selfish it is of Chapman to put his show's success ahead of his Son's happiness. Here his son has found someone he is in love with, and Chapman is more concerned about it causing problems for his show (again, ironically, he turned out to be right in a self-fulfilling prophecy kind of way) than with his Son being happy and in love.
Father first, TV star second... perspective got pretty lost there.

Finally, to those in this thread who propose that a racial slur demeaning a black person is somehow worse or more important than a racial slur demeaning a white person, I find that personally insulting and in a word, racist. People are EQUAL regardless of race or skin colour. Slurs are slurs, and are equally distasteful and unneccecary no matter what group they are focused towards.

cheers.



(in reply to EPGAH)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 12:59:01 PM   
SeeksOnlyOne


Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
i dont know where his heart and head are, but say she woulda been a skinny chick and he woulda said you should dump that pole bean buck toothed bitch.........or say she was fat......and he woulda said dump that fat cow......

i suspect he was really just saying he didnt like the gal......and the n word was an easy reference that showed distaste.........

i doubt many of us have not used a  term that was horrible and offensive to someone, when we felt comfortable with those we were speaking to.....that dumb ass cracker.....that crazy spic.....that redneck asshole.....

i havent read any of the replies yet, and i bet im gonna wish i had of before posting this-lol.  i might be wishing i hadnt typed......but really, theyre all just words......hateful, ugly words, that shouldnt be used......but heck were only humans and that aint likely to happen any time soon.....

when youre pissed, using a bad term aimed at  the person youre pissed at just feels right some times..........

i hope he beats his dumbass cracker sons ass for sellin this info.....

_____________________________

it aint no good til it hurts just a little bit....jimmy somerville

in those moments of solitude, does everyone sometimes think they are insane? or is it just me?

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 1:00:58 PM   
SeeksOnlyOne


Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CollegeConundrum

I love Dog. 

If there was ever the most hypocritical fuck, he was it.

"Please God, protect me and my family, as we go to support ourselves and grace ourselves with food as we GO TO PICK UP THIS MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT AND THROW HIM IN THE FUCKING JAIL WITH THE REST OF THOSE COCKSUCKING SON OF A BITCHES.

Please God, wrap your hands around us and embrace us in safety as we go on the hunt.  Guide us with your wisdom as we BRING IN ANOTHER DUMB MOTHERFUCKING CRACK HEAD.  WHO'S FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT ASS I'M GOING TO FUCKIN KICK.  WE'RE DOING TO DRAG THAT FUCKING PRICK THROUGH THE STREETS RIGHT INTO THE GOD DAMN JAIL CELL.

Amen."



hahaha that made me snort!

_____________________________

it aint no good til it hurts just a little bit....jimmy somerville

in those moments of solitude, does everyone sometimes think they are insane? or is it just me?

(in reply to CollegeConundrum)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 1:01:21 PM   
EPGAH


Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
Are you saying this whole thing started because it's a dog-eat-dog world, and the media's been dogging "The Dog", looking for a reason to send him to the doghouse, and his son was such a doggone idiot, he rolled over on'im?

(in reply to SeeksOnlyOne)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 1:28:31 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: diaperboy99

Dear oh dear. Are you so ignorant that in addition to your racist rants, you think America invented everything.....

The Internet was invented at CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), in Switzerland.

TV was invented by John Logie Baird in Scotland

Radio was invented by either Marconi (Italian) or Tesla (Croatian) depending on your definition of radio or radio waves.

The telephone was invented by Alexander Graham Bell in Scotland

You are the sort of American that gives the rest a bad name..... a bit like G W Bush

The internet was not invented at CERN. The World Wide Web was initially thought of by a researcher there but the internet is not WWW. The internet is just DARPAnet with a new name. The internet is definitely an american invention. Fundamentally even WWW is american as no one anywhere uses Berners-Lee software for WWW but it is impossible to avoid the use of UIUC NCSA software such as httpd (now the Apache webserver) and Mosaic (now Navigator/Firefox as well as being partially the base of Internet Explorer).

Baird is one of the inventors of television but most certainly not the sole inventor. Farnsworth deserves at least equal credit with Baird as that is the system in use today not Baird's.

Radio was invented by Tesla. Marconi may have done similiar work a little later but it isn't clear he did it independently of Tesla's work. However Tesla was a US citizen when he filed the patents in 1897 and 1898.

Alexander Graham Bell was not resident in Scotland when the telephone was invented. He was living in Boston and vacationing in Ontario. Both Elisha Gray's and Bell's patent for the initial telephone technology were filed on the same day and it isn't clear who invented the device first.

(in reply to diaperboy99)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 1:42:42 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

Are you saying this whole thing started because it's a dog-eat-dog world, and the media's been dogging "The Dog", looking for a reason to send him to the doghouse, and his son was such a doggone idiot, he rolled over on'im?

EPGAH:
No that is not what we are saying.
What appears to be the general consensus is that you seem to be the perfect example of your claimed "dumbing down" of our schools.
Had you studied history you may have noticed that the U.S. attacked Mexico and not the other way around.
You seem to think that because Tesla was living in the U.S. that somehow changed where he was born and educated.
I noticed you also failed to mention how Edison fucked him out of the money he had been promised for fixing Edison's "fuck ups"
Perhaps you just have a need to be publicly humiliated when people on this forum repeatedly point out the inconsistencies and inaccuracies of your posts and of course your unvarnished bigotry.
When challenged on your inconsistencies and inaccuracies you dance,dodge and two step your way into more inconsistencies and obfuscations.
If public humiliation is your goal then success is easily within your grasp.
thompson

(in reply to EPGAH)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 2:50:43 PM   
EPGAH


Posts: 500
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
Are you saying this whole thing started because it's a dog-eat-dog world, and the media's been dogging "The Dog", looking for a reason to send him to the doghouse, and his son was such a doggone idiot, he rolled over on'im?

EPGAH:
No that is not what we are saying.
What appears to be the general consensus is that you seem to be the perfect example of your claimed "dumbing down" of our schools.
Had you studied history you may have noticed that the U.S. attacked Mexico and not the other way around.
You seem to think that because Tesla was living in the U.S. that somehow changed where he was born and educated.
I noticed you also failed to mention how Edison fucked him out of the money he had been promised for fixing Edison's "fuck ups"
Perhaps you just have a need to be publicly humiliated when people on this forum repeatedly point out the inconsistencies and inaccuracies of your posts and of course your unvarnished bigotry.
When challenged on your inconsistencies and inaccuracies you dance,dodge and two step your way into more inconsistencies and obfuscations.
If public humiliation is your goal then success is easily within your grasp.
thompson

Tesla was from Russia...But who cares? He did his research and inventions in the Name of America, if he had any national affiliations. (Similarly, we claim Columbus discovered America in the Name of Spain, but he was born in Italy, so wouldn't that make him Italian? Same concept)
Edison was later revealed to have fucked a lot of inventors out of their credit, but how is that news? The inventor of Post-Its didn't get anything extra from it, the invention and royalties went to 3M! Valve has made a mint off packaging and selling previously free expansions for their games...And Microsoft Vista incorporates an assload of improvements that were previously free or cheap third-party mods...It's not who invents it, it's who gets to the Patent Office first! (And sometimes not even then, it might be who has the best lawyers? Witness the flap over Blackberry's E-Mail system...)
And even personally: I'm a computer-repairman, without armed guards, do you not think I've been stiffed on the bill a few times? One particularly "clever" one closed her whole checking account and moved out of state just so I wouldn't get the money!
As to Mexico:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wikipedia, but most of this is from almost carbon-copied from my old history tome, so...
Most of Texas was immediately claimed by Spain as part of the Spanish dominions of New Spain.[13] However, France took advantage of Spain's failure to settle the land and in 1685 established Fort St. Louis and claimed most of Texas. The first Spanish colonization did not come until a few years after Fort St. Louis, as Spain was spurred by France to enforce its claims. The French claim was inherited by the United States as they bought the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the Spanish claim was later inherited by Mexico during the Mexican War of Independence of 1821, setting the stage for the Mexican–American War. The French settlement was massacred by American Indians, and Spain only started sparse settlements, so most permanent settlements by Europeans didn't start until long after the first explorer arrived in 1521.
In the 1800s, two main ethnic groups settled the land: Tejanos and eventually Anglo Americans. By 1830, the 30,000 Anglo settlers in Texas outnumbered the Tejanos two to one. Smaller numbers of Europeans also came. Moses Austin bought 200,000 acres (810 km²) of land of his choice, and moved to San Antonio in August of 1821.[14] His son, Stephen F. Austin, joined him. In 1821, Texas became part of the newly independent Republic of Mexico and, in 1824, became the northern section of Coahuila y Tejas. On 3 January 1823, Stephen F. Austin began a colony of 300 Anglo American families known as the "Old Three Hundred" along the Brazos River, after Austin was authorized to do so by Governor Antonio María Martínez and then successive Mexican officials as Mexico went through tumultuous political regime changes. Austin soon organized even more groups of immigrants, Most of Texas was immediately claimed by Spain as part of the Spanish dominions of New Spain.[13] However, France took advantage of Spain's failure to settle the land and in 1685 established Fort St. Louis and claimed most of Texas. The first Spanish colonization did not come until a few years after Fort St. Louis, as Spain was spurred by France to enforce its claims. The French claim was inherited by the United States as they bought the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the Spanish claim was later inherited by Mexico during the Mexican War of Independence of 1821, setting the stage for the Mexican–American War. The French settlement was massacred by American Indians, and Spain only started sparse settlements, so most permanent settlements by Europeans didn't start until long after the first explorer arrived in 1521.
In the 1800s, two main ethnic groups settled the land: Tejanos and eventually Anglo Americans. By 1830, the 30,000 Anglo settlers in Texas outnumbered the Tejanos two to one. Smaller numbers of Europeans also came. Moses Austin bought 200,000 acres (810 km²) of land of his choice, and moved to San Antonio in August of 1821.[14] His son, Stephen F. Austin, joined him. In 1821, Texas became part of the newly independent Republic of Mexico and, in 1824, became the northern section of Coahuila y Tejas. On 3 January 1823, Stephen F. Austin began a colony of 300 Anglo American families known as the "Old Three Hundred" along the Brazos River, after Austin was authorized to do so by Governor Antonio María Martínez and then successive Mexican officials as Mexico went through tumultuous political regime changes. Austin soon organized even more groups of immigrants, with authorization from the Mexican government.
The "Conventions" of 1832 and 1833 were a response to rising unrest at the policies of the ruling Mexican government, which included the end of duty free imports from the United States and the potential end to the special allowance for slavery in the state. Slavery had been abolished in Mexico with the independence.[14] Spain's policy of allowing only full-blooded Spaniards to settle Texas also ended with independence. In 1835, Antonio López de Santa Anna, President of Mexico, proclaimed a unified constitution for all Mexican territories, including Texas.[14] The new Constitution ended the republic and the federation, imposed a central style of government with power concentrated in the President, and turned states into provinces with governors appointed from Mexico City. Some states around Mexico rebelled against this imposition, including Chihuahua, Zacatecas and Yucatan. Texans were also irritated by other policies including the forcible disarmament of Texan settlers, and the expulsion of immigrants and legal land owners originally from the United States. The example of the Centralista forces' suppression of dissidents in Zacatecas also inspired fear of the Mexican government.
On 2 March 1836, the Convention of 1836 signed a Declaration of Independence,[16] declaring Texas an independent nation.[17] On 21 April 1836, the Texans—led by General Sam Houston—won their independence when they defeated the Mexican forces of Santa Anna at the Battle of San Jacinto. Santa Anna was captured and signed the Treaties of Velasco, which gave Texas firm boundaries; Mexico repudiated the treaties, considered Texas a breakaway province, and vowed to reconquer it. Later in 1836, the Texans adopted a constitution that formally legalized slavery in Texas. The Republic of Texas included the area of the present state of Texas, and additional unoccupied territory to the west and northwest.[15]
Texans wanted annexation to the United States. Texas was fast-growing, but still poor and had great difficulty maintaining self-defense. Events such as the Dawson Massacre and two recaptures of Béxar in Texas of 1842 helped add momentum to the desire for statehood.[18] However, American politics intruded; strong Northern opposition to adding another slave state blocked annexation until the election of 1844 was won on a pro-annexation platform by James K. Polk. On 29 December 1845, Texas was admitted to the U.S. as a constituent state of the Union.[19] The Mexican–American War followed, with decisive American victories.[20] Soon after, Texas grew rapidly as migrants poured into the cotton lands.[21]

So basically, Spain "claimed" Texas, didn't enforce it, France jumped in, Spain decided to enforce it after all, then invited Americans in for easy money, then tried to control Americans...Americans didn't take too kindly to that, and demonstrated our strong, even vicious, independent streak. They decided not to respect American self-rule, and quickly found themselves on the losing end! Now we're too gentle and/or genteel (The latter is NOT a misspelling, it's a whole different--archaic--word!) to kill invaders...Maybe "we" as a nation deserve what's coming to us, but we as individuals do not.

Umm, why didn't you make a whole separate thread for this? "Hating on EPGAH" or "Arguing Ancient History with EPGAH", perhaps?
But thanks for derailing my attempt to get this thread back to its original subject!

< Message edited by EPGAH -- 11/2/2007 2:51:42 PM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/2/2007 4:57:57 PM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

You mean (gasp) the dreaded H-word? That hated epithet drenched with centuries of history of the deprivation and persecution of the white majority population?

The people who were forced to sit at the front of the bus?

The ones who have usually been the only ones allowed to govern and often vote in the US?

The ones who can't even hang the odd attractive noose-type decoration here and there without becoming the subjects of opprobrium?

How can you even think such a word?


Old news, fella.. old news. .My people were happily in Hungary herding sheep during those times.  I pay no other debts other than my own.  This "whitey deserves it until the end of time" just keeps fueling the fire.  As you sow, so shall you reap applies to both sides.

_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/3/2007 3:25:36 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
I haven't a clue what happiness your people derived from sheep but how you can call Jena "ancient history" - since that is what I was referring to - is a mystery to me.  And if you divorce yourself from the last two bloody centuries so totally, why is it you are happy to stand on that side of the argument?

You mentioned sensitivity training but are clearly in need of some yourself. Rosa Parks is not a figure of ancient history, she's still warm in her grave. Not til the "end of time", but til the end of discrimination. No country which habitually infringes the rights of a minority should reckon itself so highly. Do the words "Florida" and "Bush" ring any bells?

I have no doubt you'll come back with another example of your myopic and trite rhetoric so let me leave you with something you may un-der-stand: "Two wrongs don't make one right".

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/3/2007 3:43:57 AM   
SeeksOnlyOne


Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

I haven't a clue what happiness your people derived from sheep but how you can call Jena "ancient history" - since that is what I was referring to - is a mystery to me.  And if you divorce yourself from the last two bloody centuries so totally, why is it you are happy to stand on that side of the argument?

You mentioned sensitivity training but are clearly in need of some yourself. Rosa Parks is not a figure of ancient history, she's still warm in her grave. Not til the "end of time", but til the end of discrimination. No country which habitually infringes the rights of a minority should reckon itself so highly. Do the words "Florida" and "Bush" ring any bells?

I have no doubt you'll come back with another example of your myopic and trite rhetoric so let me leave you with something you may un-der-stand: "Two wrongs don't make one right".


slight hijack, but this seems to be a thread of them so forgive me......

my son fell in love with a black girl back in the 7th grade. and yes i said black, not african american-he was white and she was black.  she is a gorgeous, intelligent gal, who made him a better person, and i adore her and her family.  after 2 years of her telling him that for their relationship to continue, he needed to go to church, he finally said im going to go to church with her.

i took them and dropped them off, and picked them up, took her home.  on the drive home, i noticed a strange look on his face, and asked him whats wrong.  he, in the sweet, teenage way they have told me NOTHING!

another mile down the road, i see tears rolling down his face.  i asked again what is wrong....

he began to cry, which is something he does not do....and he said to me mom i was the only white person in church.  she and i believed it wouldnt be a big deal.  but folks looked at me and talked to me like they despised me.  i could feel the hatred they felt towards me and towards her, for dating outside her race.  she felt it too and was as shocked as he was by the response of her good christian family.

i told him i had known that would happen, but when i had tried to explain it to him, he had shrugged me off and told me it was my racist views making me thing black folks were like that too.

it was a hard lesson for him to learn.  he refused to go back to that environment, and rather than argue with her about it, a few months later he broke up with her.  he is now 19, and still in love with that gal.  they talk on the phone, she comes to visit when shes in town from college, and lawd only knows if they will end up together forever when they both mature more and can handle the racism thrown at them from both sides of the isle.

my point is, discrimination isnt ever going to end, from either side of the races.  some folks think you should only date your own race....period.   some folks think any race but their own is not as good...period.  blah blah blah

so my son paid for racism, from blacks.  i paid in many ways, because my ex left when i refused to back him telling our son he had to stop dating a black chick.

life sucks some days and aint fair most days.....the jena dudes responded to nooses with brutality....both parties were wrong, the ones that drew blood were more wrong, imho.

and no 2 wrongs dont make a right........but people are going to be imperfect for all eternity....if things have a chance to change, it will be from folks living by example, not getting their panties in a wad and sayin well hell they did me wrong so ill do them wronger....(is wronger a word)

back to your regularly scheduled programming.

_____________________________

it aint no good til it hurts just a little bit....jimmy somerville

in those moments of solitude, does everyone sometimes think they are insane? or is it just me?

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/3/2007 4:35:44 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
SeeksOnlyOne, that is a very touching story and I am certain that there have been others who have had the same experience. Nothing can excuse the treatment your son and his girlfriend received and I do not condone it. I won't try to justify it either. But we both know there are other churches where they would be welcome. Maybe they could try finding one?

The fact that they will have to battle prejudice in order to simply have a relationship is what is at the heart of this issue and why I don't feel it is a hijack at all. Having seen what amounts to the segregation of your society - with a black, an Hispanic, a white part of town - and they way everyone goes about their business like that's normal is remarkable to me, coming from London. It is a direct legacy of your history. There are still states which have old Jim Crow legislation on their statute books, whether enforced today or not. The world view of someone who grows up on that "side of the tracks" - with institutionalised racism a daily part of reality is not likely to be as generous as one might wish. But you can't wish the past away, you have to actively dismantle the parts of it that linger on but shouldn't.

Blacks were enslaved by whites, with all that that entails. (Don't buy into the stuff about blacks being just as to blame for slavery -its empty lies, holocaust denial if you will.) And you can't expect every one of us to be saintly and forgiving about it - especially when racism still exists today. It simply is *not* the same the other way around. Resenting someone dating your sister because he descends from the group who exploited and brutalised your forebears is unfair, but is an all-too human response. To them, at worse he is surrounded by noose-hanging, epithet-calling rednecks. At best he has never had to bother his head once with the single largest brake on their progress in society.

Its prejudice to dislike someone before you get to know them. So these people displayed prejudice. Racism is different, namely its a belief system which places whites at the top and all others ranked beneath. Leaving morality out of it, did any of that congregation believe themselves *superior* to your son? And if they did, did they have the weight of an entire society, its laws, history and common practice, behind them? Because until you can answer "yes" to both of those questions, your son has not experienced racism.

Count yourself lucky that you have raised what sounds like a sensitive and fair-minded son. You haven't paid by losing your racist ex, you've really gained the opportunity to find the decent guy you should have.

But don't think that black resentment towards white cultural hegemony equates with racism. Painful as that experience was and is, its only a symptom of the racist past which won't go away until as many whites rail against racism as do blacks. What I am trying to say is, don't blame the victims.

(in reply to SeeksOnlyOne)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/3/2007 5:36:56 AM   
SeeksOnlyOne


Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
while the experience hurt my son, and therefore hurt me, i dont see it as hatred...i see it as the freedom to choose whether you agree with dating outside ones race.

some have good reasons for choosing that, some have horrible ones, but it is a choice, and i support their right to want black women to date only black men.

i also support anyone elses right to say i will not date outside my race.

i do not support judging others who choose to date outside their race.

i guess im wearing rose colored glasses, because to me the solution is as simple as .....live and let live....

_____________________________

it aint no good til it hurts just a little bit....jimmy somerville

in those moments of solitude, does everyone sometimes think they are insane? or is it just me?

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word - 11/3/2007 5:48:52 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
What a shame to see such defeatism.

Racism is not an inevitable facet of life. Human beings are not innately racist, as you have suggested. Racism is entirely produced by socialisation and as such is eradicable.

You're right that the solution is simple, though. People will continue to cross that line, more and more; whatever any of us feels about it. The simple choice is to decide which side of of the equation you belong on: the past or the future - not the black or the white.

(in reply to SeeksOnlyOne)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Dog the Bounty Hunter & the "N" word Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094