RE: Pure/Natural subs

RE: Pure/Natural subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

nella -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/6/2005 8:54:05 PM)
Ok, i did not think of it from that angel, thanks for the information.

doubleLeo -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/6/2005 9:02:47 PM)
wanted to add on, My first real knowingness was age 6..

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/6/2005 10:17:34 PM)
I cant exactly narrow it down that close for me, but Its juts been gradual knowledge all the time.

kisshou -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 6:13:46 AM)
KarbonCopy, great thread but every time I read it I get that hair commercial song stuck in my head. 'You make me feel like a natural woman', it is making me nuts ! I knew a girl who would dedicate that song to her Owner all the time.

mistoferin -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 6:29:16 AM)
quote: every time I read it I get that hair commercial song stuck in my head. 'You make me feel like a natural woman', it is making me nuts ! lmao....I am so glad I am not the only one! Every time I read this title I all I can think of is Pure & Natural soap.

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 7:40:00 AM)
oh lol, sorry you two.

jocelyn -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 8:39:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote: The terms "natural" and "true" are pet peeves of mine. You can naturally have a dominant or submissive personality, but being A submissive or dominant is learned. one of this slave's pet peeves is also the "true" label when applied to Dom/mes or sub/slaves, unless of course we are talking about a role in a theater production or a movie, but that's "acting". however, "natural" is something that this slave does not find offensive or self-inflating. I know that the topic of "real/true" vs. something else is what one of my other boards (gotta love those Unitarians!) calls a bout of "wordminton" but it does bear a bit of discussion. Perhaps we can be careful about using terms as "put downs." I only know, deeply, one frame of reference - my own. Master thinks there's a difference in those of us who have always been aware of our core nature, as I do, but neither of us feel a need to judge relative worth for such shades of belief or action. The one exception - and it's a large one - is when someone attempts to legislate our behavior in the bedroom or anywhere else, using his or her personal belief structure as a template. THOSE folks are dolts. Dorks. Nasty wastes of skin. Ahem. Thanks. I feel much better now... Blessed be! jocelyn

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 8:55:56 AM)
My intent was never to establish a "who's better than who" type thing. I've just come to the conclusion that there may be two different types of lifestylers, and if ther is a difference, we should try to better understand this difference in order to learn more about the people. i'm sorry i'm really tired. . . did that make sense?

MtPleasantsubAsh -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 9:59:06 AM)
did anyone read my post? seriously

mistoferin -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 10:18:15 AM)
quote: I think thatthe vanilla life isn't some disease or something you don't want to get too close to...BDSM is a lifestlye, as well as vanilla...it's just a choice, a preference...mostly.. BDSM is action, and yes there is a choice in whether or not you wish to participate in that way. Submissive, on the other hand is my orientation, it is who I am. I could not choose to be anyone other than who I am anymore than I could choose to be a different gender. I was born this way, I will die this way. Make sense?

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 10:36:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MtPleasantsubAsh did anyone read my post? seriously Well relax, I dont think of the vanilla lifestyle as something bad. It was almost a bit of humour, but next time I'll try and keep the jokes to a minimal. Vanilla is great if thats what your into.

EmeraldSlave2 -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/7/2005 1:15:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy I've just come to the conclusion that there may be two different types of lifestylers, Why did you come to this conclusion and what are the specific differences between them?

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 12:42:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: EmeraldSlave2 quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy I've just come to the conclusion that there may be two different types of lifestylers, Why did you come to this conclusion and what are the specific differences between them? You know to be perfectly honest with you EmeraldSlave2, I dont know exactly. I've just noticed a difference, and I was wondering what others thoughts were on the subject. Though I could be absolutely on the wrong track, it happens.

MrThorns -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 6:47:40 AM)
First off, I'm one of those that shudder every time someone says that they are a "natural" or "true" anything. This always seems to be something cut and paste right out of castlerealm...AKA BDSM-for-the online-crowd-by-the-online-crowd-without-knowing-what-the-hell-we're-talking-about.com. quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy Are we going to be seeing a new generation of lifestylers? Uncorrupted by the vanilla world? Are we seeing a new generation? Yes. Most certainly, but it has absolutely nothing to do with being "natural". People are simply being exposed to various kinks much earlier than they had been in the past. You see much more leather and latex, sex, BDSM-related advertising, etc within the mainstream media. Kids go to a "PG" movie and see things that were considered unsuitable for children under the age of 17 10-15 years ago. Parents monitor their children less so you may find 13 year olds hanging out in BDSM chatrooms or watching "The Secretary". The younger crowd is getting interested earlier, but they are definately not uncorrupted. The internet is largely responsible for a lot of new people finding BDSM, however it is also responsible for most of the gross misconceptions regarding BDSM. Then you have a lot of the "Next Generation" groups that don't like to see "old" people play, so they form a clique of people within their own age group. Some of these groups get involved with larger organizations and get some real mentoring, but others rely only on what they are taught by their peers, (which again may be only what they had learned in some chatroom.) I believe that some people may be genetically inclined to seek out a dominant or submissive position within a relationship, but it is a matter of when the person is exposed to BDSM and what information they are exposed to that determines if and when they will take the next step and how "corrupted" they will be. ~Thorns

plantlady64 -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 6:56:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy My intent was never to establish a "who's better than who" type thing. I've just come to the conclusion that there may be two different types of lifestylers, and if ther is a difference, we should try to better understand this difference in order to learn more about the people. i'm sorry i'm really tired. . . did that make sense? Hello There, I don't think a natural sub or slave has any more or less value or capabilities than the other. The mind is a very powerful tool when it comes to behavior modification. A willing and devoted sub/slave, regardless of weather they have the natural ability, or have learned the path with a little more effort can both behave in similar ways as far as habits and responses. It's just something that the natural sub/slave is able to process and understand the reasoning or affect behind the action without as much processing required to make it click in place and make sense. We all have things we are good at. We are involved in relationships that have as many components and layers you could view a person like an onion, as far as the different components of someone’s personality. I think natural sub/slaves once harvested are peeled well into the middle from the first notions turning themselves on in their minds. Non-natural but devoted to the learning path sub/slaves just have more peeling they have to peel on their own to catch up. Both types of them have the same middles it's just how easy they can peel the layers back and expose their soft middles is the difference. Sincerely, sub suzanne

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 8:36:46 AM)
Is there some sort of characteristical NEED from quote unquote "natural" slaves?

MrThorns -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 9:39:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy Is there some sort of characteristical NEED from quote unquote "natural" slaves? There is when you have little else but contempt for the term...yeah. ~Thorns

KarbonCopy -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 9:53:00 AM)
Well if someone can suggest a different name? I mean can we deny the difference between those who discover the life, and those who feel like its natual to them?

RiotGirl -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 12:15:07 PM)
To answer the question and not jump into the debate. i think "natural" as opposed to unnatural is this. Natural, its IN THEM.. inside of them.. part of who they are.. and un natural.. it is a role for them.

perverseangelic -> RE: Pure/Natural subs (8/8/2005 12:42:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KarbonCopy Well if someone can suggest a different name? I mean can we deny the difference between those who discover the life, and those who feel like its natual to them? Hrm. What about those of us who feel that it is natural to us, but didn't realize it till we "discovered" it. That is, I always knew what felt good and right to me. Very much like MadameDahlia, I had experience with Barbies before I even had an understanding of how "sex" worked and was tying myself up as soon as I figured out how to tie knots. That said, I didn't think =anyone= else did anything like this. I figured it was just another one of those crazynesses that was unique to me. I figured that I was the only person into this type of stuff. Then I discovered it :) It gave a name and a shape to the things that I did because they felt good, and gave me a whole lot o' fantasy fodder :) I dunno. I think there's more to it than "find out about it" vs "always know what they want"

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125