caitlyn
Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver Ron, the supporters of the war want to be blind and illiterate but why, who knows? You would think all Americans would be angry with Bush, the way he has put dollars into his cronies pockets and been maverick with the economy and ignored the real threat to the US, a economically vigorous China. Bush should have been concentrating on making the US economy competitive for future security not going around the world on military jollies. This thread is largely illustrative of the original and actual point of this post, so I picked it out of thousands. The fact that it came from Meatcleaver, is an added bonus. Believe it or not, there are a some of us "blind and illiterate" masses, that can differ with someone's policies, without being angry at them. Amazingly, some of us "stupid folks" can actually tow that fine line ... I'm basically completely against the war, but at the same time, every single person I know (and these days, I know a lot more than most) that has served over there, insists that the war is worthwhile, and that people outside Iraq have no clue about what's going on over there. Now, either argument can be hashed about forever ... but the point: What is the logic in finding hate and anger, within an issue that is clearly, unclear? Simply put, for all the intelligencia wants to insist that support for President Bush is (insert insult here) ... I think an equal case can be made that hatred and anger, really is irrational. Simple question: How many good decisions have people made, out of hatred and anger? By the way ... this was primarily a general response.
_____________________________
I wish I could buy back ... the woman you stole.
|