BlackKnight
Posts: 767
Joined: 1/1/2004 Status: offline
|
I've heard plenty-o-good 'bout Ron, I need to research more. hellary might not be the anti-christ, but she's a contender(the anti-christ will have a bigger following, and acceptance, plus wont be in power for about 26+ years, hmmmm, maybe celsie, nah , only if she gets better looking). Polititions need to get paid, otherwise no one would do it, but I was thinking that 'bout that abstainance from votes of the personal effect nature, but a party sticks together, and how do we find out when deals are done 'under the table'? the news is owned by the gov't, they have no backbone, no real investigative reporting, no checks and balances. We don't know. We have the vote, but do not use the power. Then voting someone out to be replaced by who? Another crook? Can an honest person make it in politics? They'll get steamrollered over. How do we lead the sheeple to the clean water, when the billboards, lights, loudspeakers are at the poisoned water telling them to drink? are there honest people in politics? Ron Paul, hmmm, is he our only hope? how do we correct the problem? will we be able to correct the problem? can we come up with a reasonable solution, the lead the sheeple to drink? :::::::::Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure!:::::::::::::::::
_____________________________
'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.' Life of Reason, Reason in Common Sense, Scribner's, 1905, page 284" George Santayana Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get me!
|