Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!)


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 11:00:31 AM   
subfever


Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

And all this time I thought that all the inner city gangs were caucaision. You know, like the "Jets" and the "Sharks."
You mean I'm wrong?


I see the point you're trying to make.

However, I believe that when the playing field is truly leveled for all, the ethnic makeup of gangs will be directly proportionate to the ethnic populations.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 11:46:19 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

And all this time I thought that all the inner city gangs were caucaision. You know, like the "Jets" and the "Sharks."
You mean I'm wrong?


I see the point you're trying to make.

However, I believe that when the playing field is truly leveled for all, the ethnic makeup of gangs will be directly proportionate to the ethnic populations.



Whites form violent "gangs" too... look at the United States government, the Mafia, the WTO... etc etc etc

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 12:18:32 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
And don't forget Fonzie.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 1:04:11 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

And don't forget Fonzie.



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 1:13:44 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

And don't forget Fonzie.




Now, don't you laugh, he was in a gang! Remember, he had that funny blue jacket.....

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 4:26:16 PM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
"The judges who made this unfortunate ruling simply do not understand the First amendment," Paul stated. "It does not bar religious expression in public settings or anywhere else. In fact, it expressly prohibits federal interference in the free expression of religion.


Yeah, that's sad. Watch your hero fall...

Here is the salient part:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Did you catch that first part? "...shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." What can it mean? How can we find out? Gee, let's ask our old friend Thomas Jefferson:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for is faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties." - Letter to the Danbury Baptists


Maybe we should ask James Madison, the principal author of the constitution:

"The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State." (1819).

Call me crazy, but I am not going to take the idiot Dr No's opinion over those of Jefferson and Madison. Sorry, not gonna happen.

You can read more here:
http://altreligion.about.com/library/weekly/aa070202a.htm

-----

I don't want to go all out on a tangent here, but this information might be useful: many of the Founding Fathers were deists and not Christians - something many modern readers fail to understand.

People express themselves with available language. "Nature," "Nature's God," and "Creator" were all terms being used by the founders because they were discussing something other than what most people mean by simply stating "God."

So when the founders used those kinds of phrases what they really meant was something akin to "first cause" which is a fairly accepted scientific statement when discussing the origins of the universe or the world.

More references follow...

-----

Quick definition:
Deism: [1]deúism. noun. The belief, based solely on reason, in a God who created the universe and then abandoned it, assuming no control over life, exerting no influence on natural phenomena, and giving no supernatural revelation.

-----

"As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion . . . has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble."
-- Benjamin Franklin, letter to Ezra Stiles March 9, 1790

"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies."
-- Benjamin Franklin, in Toward The Mystery

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
-- James Madison, letter to William Bradford April 1, 1774

"The Christian god can be easily pictured as virtually the same as the many ancient gods of past civilizations. The Christian god is a three headed monster; cruel, vengeful and capricious. If one wishes to know more of this raging, three headed beast-like god, one only needs to look at the caliber of the people who say they serve him. They are always of two classes: fools and hypocrites."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to his nephew, Peter Carr

"The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ leveled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained."
-- Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John Adams, July 5, 1814

"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of . . . Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."
-- Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

"...denominated a Deist, the reality of which I never disputed, being conscious I am no Christian."
-- Ethan Allen, Reason the Only Oracle of Man

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, -- as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-- and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religous opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
-- Joel Barlow, Article 11 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the US and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary, written during Washington's administration, ratified during Adams' administration.

"The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole carloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in Christianity."
-- John Adams


Further refs:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b44ab97110d.htm
http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6177
http://www.deism.org/foundingfathers.htm
http://freethought.mbdojo.com/foundingfathers.html



(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 4:46:11 PM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Churro,
Thanks for the quotes, and the links. I've been getting into some off board discussions about this very thing with another member, thanks to the other thread "A Controversial Subject."

I remember Franklin's quote, mostly because I've been an admirer of his since my early days. I too, stopped going to church... shortly after I went through confirmation... more to please my parents than anything else.

I always liked a statement made by the previous Dali Lama, on Christianity: "Man against God...God against Man... Man against nature... nature against Man... Man against Man... veeeery strange religion!"

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 10:30:54 PM   
subfever


Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
"The judges who made this unfortunate ruling simply do not understand the First amendment," Paul stated. "It does not bar religious expression in public settings or anywhere else. In fact, it ethe


Yeah, that's sad. Watch your hero fall...

Here is the salient part:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Did you catch that first part? "...shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." What can it mean? How can we find out? Gee, let's ask our old friend Thomas Jefferson:

"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for is faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties." - Letter to the Danbury Baptists


Maybe we should ask James Madison, the principal author of the constitution:

"The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State." (1819).

Call me crazy, but I am not going to take the idiot Dr No's opinion over those of Jefferson and Madison. Sorry, not gonna happen.

You can read more here:
http://altreligion.about.com/library/weekly/aa070202a.htm

-----

I don't want to go all out on a tangent here, but this information might be useful: many of the Founding Fathers were deists and not Christians - something many modern readers fail to understand.

People express themselves with available language. "Nature," "Nature's God," and "Creator" were all terms being used by the founders because they were discussing something other than what most people mean by simply stating "God."

So when the founders used those kinds of phrases what they really meant was something akin to "first cause" which is a fairly accepted scientific statement when discussing the origins of the universe or the world.

More references follow...

-----

Quick definition:
Deism: [1]deúism. noun. The belief, based solely on reason, in a God who created the universe and then abandoned it, assuming no control over life, exerting no influence on natural phenomena, and giving no supernatural revelation.

-----

"As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion . . . has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble."
-- Benjamin Franklin, letter to Ezra Stiles March 9, 1790

"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies."
-- Benjamin Franklin, in Toward The Mystery

"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
-- James Madison, letter to William Bradford April 1, 1774

"The Christian god can be easily pictured as virtually the same as the many ancient gods of past civilizations. The Christian god is a three headed monster; cruel, vengeful and capricious. If one wishes to know more of this raging, three headed beast-like god, one only needs to look at the caliber of the people who say they serve him. They are always of two classes: fools and hypocrites."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to his nephew, Peter Carr

"The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ leveled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained."
-- Thomas Jefferson, Letter to John Adams, July 5, 1814

"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of . . . Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."
-- Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

"...denominated a Deist, the reality of which I never disputed, being conscious I am no Christian."
-- Ethan Allen, Reason the Only Oracle of Man

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, -- as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-- and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religous opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
-- Joel Barlow, Article 11 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the US and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary, written during Washington's administration, ratified during Adams' administration.

"The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole carloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in Christianity."
-- John Adams


Further refs:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b44ab97110d.htm
http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6177
http://www.deism.org/foundingfathers.htm
http://freethought.mbdojo.com/foundingfathers.html





Uh-huh. So then... help me out here. What does any of this have to do with the First Amendment expressly prohibiting federal interference in the free expression of religion?

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/17/2007 11:00:36 PM   
GoddessDustyGold


Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004
From: Arizona
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever


Uh-huh. So then... help me out here. What does any of this have to do with the First Amendment expressly prohibiting federal interference in the free expression of religion?


Better that you asked, rather than Me! 

I will expand on it a bit though...

quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

Here is the salient part:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Did you catch that first part? "...shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." What can it mean?



What the first part means, SMC, before you are so quick to quote and assume that these forefathers were somehow stating that they didn't want any Christian beliefs in this country, is that there would be no establishment of a "state religion".  All religions were welcome and the free expression of those religions was to be honored.
In addition to twistng the original intent...
Here's the other salient part:
...or prohibiting the free exercise, therof. 
Or did you miss the second part, SMC?
 
I will check back for your next argument.


_____________________________

Dusty
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety
B Franklin
Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them
The Hidden Kingdom


(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 1:41:03 AM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
Things like "keeping "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance," "the school prayer amendment" and "keeping the Ten Commandments on a courthouse lawn" are all generally barred by the establishment clause.

No one is telling anyone else not to express and practice their religion in their own ways (Paul's very limited arguments fit here), but if the state operates so as to make such expression or to make such a practice a matter of public display it violates the establishment clause. The key is the involvement of the government - the religious expression or display cannot be by the government, nor in a government place. No government involvement, no problem.

And this is what the courts have also held.

Now the courts could be wrong, but I fail to see how they are wrong in this case. To champion any one faith is to establish it and disparage other religious beliefs or the absence of such religious belief.

What possible other reply was there to make?

(in reply to GoddessDustyGold)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 5:06:33 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro
To champion any one faith is to establish it and disparage other religious beliefs or the absence of such religious belief.


Did little Sugar feel slighted, because little Johnny got a bigger helping at lunch?
 
I don't see Congressman Paul as a viable candidate for President, but do see him as an important member of Congress. Some may not like his politics, but he does a good job of voting the policies supported by the majority in his Congressional District ... which is supposedly what we elect people to do.

_____________________________

I wish I could buy back ...
the woman you stole.

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 5:16:18 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

And all this time I thought that all the inner city gangs were caucaision. You know, like the "Jets" and the "Sharks."
You mean I'm wrong?


I see the point you're trying to make.

However, I believe that when the playing field is truly leveled for all, the ethnic makeup of gangs will be directly proportionate to the ethnic populations.



Whites form violent "gangs" too... look at the United States government, the Mafia, the WTO... etc etc etc



Bang on!   On another board this gal from california who does work for the fed continually reminds me of precisely that by saying..... Hey you know full well the government is the best business in town!  (it pretty hard to say no to whatever they want)








_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 7:55:10 AM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
Did little Sugar feel slighted, because little Johnny got a bigger helping at lunch?


Is that the best you can do? Stray off topic and try for some kind of oblique insult?

Pathetic.



I'm supposed to be jealous of people with religious beliefs? To the contrary, I am hugely thankful to be precisely unlike them.





(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 8:02:01 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

Here is the salient part:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Did you catch that first part? "...shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." What can it mean? How can we find out? Gee, let's ask our old friend Thomas Jefferson:



I certainly did catch that :)

Did you know there is a difference between establishing a religion and recognizing the inalienable right to worship a religion in law?

What is religion but following the moral edicts of ones "conscience"?

God by any other name is a generic term used by all religions that i am aware of and use of the word God establishes no "specific" religion.  It is a false premise to think this country was not founded on religious, specifically christian principles as can be seen by the volumes of text in both the early constitution and those of the states in the confederation.

Regardless of what specific religion the writers of the constitution were the moral edict was basically summarized as "conscience" to cover all religions and all Gods..  Even in the development of the constitution itself as can be seen in the senate journals.


Regardless of what specific religion they were the moral edict was basically summarized as "conscience".  Even in the development of the constitution itself as can be seen in the senate journals.


Journal of the Senate of the United States of America, TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 1789.

"Art. XIV. No state shall infringe the right of trial by jury in criminal cases, nor the rights of conscience, nor the freedom of speech, or of the press.



"That no person shall be capable of being elected a senator who is not of the Protestant religion." (New Hampshire Constitution of 1784.)



The Fundamental Constitutions for the Province of East New Jersey in America, Anno Domini 1683 (1)

XVI. All persons living in the Province who confess and acknowledge the one Almighty and Eternal God, and holds themselves obliged in conscience to live peaceably and quietly in a civil society, shall in no way be molested or prejudged for their religious perswasions and exercise in matters of faith and worship; nor shall they be compelled to frequent and maintain any religious worship, place or ministry whatsoever: Yet it is also hereby provided, that no man shall be admitted a member of the great or common Council, or any other place of publick trust, who shall not profaith in Christ Jesus, and solemnly declare that he doth no ways hold himself obliged in conscience to endeavour alteration in the government, or seeks the turning out of any in it or their ruin or prejudice, either in person or estate, because they are in his opinion hereticks, or differ in their judgment from him: Nor by this article is it intended, that any under the notion of this liberty shall allow themselves to avow atheism, irreligiousness, or to practice cursing, swearing, drunkenness, prophaness, whoring, adultery, murdering or any kind of violence, or indulging themselves in stage plays, masks, revells or such like abuses; for restraining such and preserving of the people in deligence and in good order, the great Council is to make more particular laws, which are punctually to be put in execution.



In 1934 the United States Supreme Court held that due process is violated "if a practice or rule offends some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental".[7]
http://www.answers.com/topic/due-process

"That all persons and religious societies who acknowledge that there is one God, and a future state of rewards and punishments, and that God is publicly to be worshipped, shall be freely tolerated. The Christian Protestant religion shall be deemed, and is hereby constituted and declared to be, the established religion of this State. That all denominations of Christian Protestants in this State, demeaning themselves peaceably and faithfully, shall enjoy equally religious and civil privileges.

"No person shall be eligible to a seat in the said senate unless he be of the Protestant religion. No person shall be eligible to sit in the house of representatives unless he be of the Protestant religion." (South Carolina Constitution of 1778.)


"As morality and piety, rightly grounded on evangelical principles, will give the best and greatest security to government, and will lay in the hearts of men the strongest obligations to due subjection; and as the knowledge of these is most likely to be propagated through a society by the institution of the public worship of the DEITY, and of public instruction in morality and religion; therefore, to promote those important purposes, the people of this state have a right to impower, and do hereby fully impower the legislature to authorize from time to time, the several towns, parishes, bodies-corporate, or religious societies within this state, to make adequate provision at their own expence, for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion and morality.....



"It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society, publicly and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained, in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping God in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience, or for his religious profession or sentiments, provided he doth not disturb the public peace or obstruct others in their religious worship....

"Therefore, to promote their happiness and to secure the good order and preservation of their government, the people of this commonwealth have a right to invest their legislature with power to authorize and require, and the legislature shall, from time to time, authorize and require the several towns, parishes, precincts, and other bodies-politic or religious societies to make suitable provision, at their own expense, for the institution of the public worship of God and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality in all cases where such provision shall not be made voluntarily....
(Massachusetts Constitution of 1780.)
constitutionsociety.org
file:///D:/Research/Constitution/Evolution%20of%20the%20Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States/evcon.htm



Clinton believes that the law of nature consists of practical reason applied to human experience.
http://www.thelockeinstitute.org/journals/luminary_v1_n2_p4.html

Most were nominally members of one of the traditional churches in their part of the country—the New Englanders Congregationalists and Presbyterians, the Southerners Episcopalians, and the men of the Middle States everything from backsliding Quakers to stubborn Catholics—and most were men who could take their religion or leave it alone. Although no one in this sober gathering would have dreamed of invoking the Goddess of Reason, neither would anyone have dared to proclaim that his opinions had the support of the God of Abraham and Paul. The Convention of 1787 was highly rationalist and even secular in spirit.”  (Clinton Rossiter, American historian, “The Men of Philadelphia,” in 1787: The Grand Convention, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1987 [first ed., 1966], pp. 147-148.)

The Constitution that the framers agreed on and that the States ratified is neutral regarding religion, and not by accident. All the precedents, all the previous governing documents they had to draw from, were not neutral. The usual pattern was to invoke one form or another of “Almighty God” or of “The Lord” as the ultimate authority for the charter—until the Constitution’s “We the people . . .” broke that precedent in 1787. The framers, whatever their personal religious preferences, consciously decided that the federal government had no business making religious decisions for U.S. citizens.
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=columns&page=framers


There are literally volumes upon volumes of documents all referencing various religious principles for the foundations of this country.

The moral of the story of course is that this government was formed within the boundaries of one flavor of christianity or another and of course reason as well and old law and so forth that dates back to the beginning of mankind pre-religion and back to the superstitution days if we really want to split hairs.



Its pretty difficult to separate reason from morality and morality from religion or lack of it as it is all intrinsically tied together.


Disclaimer to those who are spatially challenged:  This is heavily edited to prevent anihilation.



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 11/18/2007 8:07:30 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 8:54:39 AM   
subfever


Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
I agree that the government should not express religious beliefs. However, I interpret things like the Ten Commandments to be more of an expression of basic human morality than a Christian Doctrine.

Also, in my view, the government should be about one tenth the size it is today. From what I've seen of you, you believe the government should be even bigger than it is today. In your world, the schools apparently are and should be government. Therefore, the children shouldn't be able to express "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance if they want to.

In my world, the schools shouldn't be government. The children should be able to express "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance if they want to, or just omit the words if they prefer.

Ron Paul, while far from perfect, would move this country more towards the direction I personally feel it should go, than any other candidate. And it may interest you to know that I am not a religious man myself. Never have been.

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 9:01:50 AM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
So then how do you account for all of the specifically anti-Christian rhetoric of the Founding Fathers themselves? I think you want to simply ignore that fact or cherry-pick. We are talking of figures no less than Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, etc.

Anyway, much of what you cite was off-point, or didn't you understand that? Without researching further how do I know that some state law that you mighty cite wasn't later shot down precisely because of the establishment clause? I am not so invested in this topic that I am going to research that stuff any further. I know what the courts have been holding lately and it doesn't look good for Dr, No's position. Sorry.

To be honest, I have a limit to how much I wish to discuss this issue because the devout want to be legally justified in their beliefs and I as a non-believer am not particularly inclined to simply give them their way on this issue either. We might have to agree to disagree.

I don't believe this is a Christian nation nor do I believe it ever was intended to be one. But Christian churches have always gravitated toward power so it makes sense that religious people want political sanction.

I oppose that very thing.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 9:07:22 AM   
SugarMyChurro


Posts: 1912
Joined: 4/26/2007
Status: offline
I don't believe in the pledge of allegiance on any basis. I have almost always abstained from stating any part of it even since I was a young boy. The god bit was grafted onto an original version. More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance

I don't waive or display flags either. And I don't care if people want to use the flag as underwear or clothing or bikinis. I don't even care if someone wants to burn the flag or deep fry it. If I lacked toilet paper I might use a flag as suitable replacement for such.

Pffft...!



All that shit is sham patriotism.


(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 9:10:58 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline


Possibly the most fundamental is stealing, murder etc, while not limited to christian all has its roots in natural law which will go all the way back to prehistoric man, as i said if you want to start splitting hairs that finely.

One hge curve ball is that i think in every courtroom we swear on the bible, "do you swear to tell the truth so help me God".  The question is how does that fit in with the deist thing?   It does not make sense to say s"so help me reason", so its not really interchangeable.

I whole heartedly agree that RP is not perfect and have been waiting frankly for SMC to show us who he would recommend and he has not responded to that request.  If not RP then who SMC?

The biggest problem in politics today is that they deal with the symptoms and not the cause and while it takes on the appearance of "getting something done" we only become more entrenched in a failed system.

I agree SF that he has a very fundamental grasp of the problems we are dealing with at a root level where any change what so ever would have a huge impact in bettering many of the areas we all complain about daily on here.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 9:12:58 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro

So then how do you account for all of the specifically anti-Christian rhetoric of the Founding Fathers themselves? I think you want to simply ignore that fact or cherry-pick. We are talking of figures no less than Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, etc.

Anyway, much of what you cite was off-point, or didn't you understand that? Without researching further how do I know that some state law that you mighty cite wasn't later shot down precisely because of the establishment clause? I am not so invested in this topic that I am going to research that stuff any further. I know what the courts have been holding lately and it doesn't look good for Dr, No's position. Sorry.

To be honest, I have a limit to how much I wish to discuss this issue because the devout want to be legally justified in their beliefs and I as a non-believer am not particularly inclined to simply give them their way on this issue either. We might have to agree to disagree.

I don't believe this is a Christian nation nor do I believe it ever was intended to be one. But Christian churches have always gravitated toward power so it makes sense that religious people want political sanction.

I oppose that very thing.



Oh much of it was shot down, but we are talking about founding the country and I have shown that it was a very religious politic.

It was shot down for obvious reasons...  States were claiming only protestants could be senators!

That sort of thing cant stand regardless of the founding principals.

It further shows the recognition of conscience even in the early developement of the constitution itself.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 11/18/2007 9:16:49 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SugarMyChurro)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) - 11/18/2007 9:17:28 AM   
subfever


Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


The biggest problem in politics today is that they deal with the symptoms and not the cause and while it takes on the appearance of "getting something done" we only become more entrenched in a failed system.

I agree SF that he has a very fundamental grasp of the problems we are dealing with at a root level where any change what so ever would have a huge impact in bettering many of the areas we all complain about daily on here.





Bingo!

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: The REAL Ron Paul (Just say no!) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109