Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 There`s no proof that money went to her.He had to have the cops there ,even if it was to visit his gumada. My issue,and it was at the time,was Clinton being attacked over one blow job(according to the Starr Report,it was one blow job),while the republicans ignored their man in NYC`s fucking around,along with every other republican leader. 1. Did Rudy lie about it under oath? 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? It wasn't the act...it was the cover-up that doomed Clinton. 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? Starr`s report, shows no evidence of this.Read up. Neo-cons only think it`s lying,when it`s under oath.So unless and until that happens,the sky`s the limit.That`s the level of integrity, neo-cons have.lol There`s a big difference. One lie,was in a deposition,of a frivolous,private law suite(perjury trap).No one died.Get it?No dead guys...... The other lie(s)by Bush,have resulted in a clusterfuck.A very expensive,deadly clusterfuck. Thanks neo-cons. Guess I`m getting my answer about mis-placed outrage,and selective outrage. BTW,if you cheat on your wife,as Rudy did for years in an on-going affair,you can`t not lie.It`s impossible to get through the week without lying to someone,when you`re cheating continuously.It`s still lying,even when not under oath.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 12/2/2007 10:56:38 AM >
|