RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive



Message


AquaticSub -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 7:28:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Like submissives Doms are diverse. I'm asking about the submissives whom feel the need to Dom the Dom. Conversely much like Doms submitting to a submissive. Again very few at this point of my post seem to think I'm challenging all subs.Not the case.


I get that. But until you give an example of what you consider to be doming the dom, we really don't have anything to work from.

quote:


Let me put it this way. I have had a few subs whom have approached/told me how I was to behave, how and when they would submit. The list goes on. I would say they where simply not polite about it. They would go on the attack with their approach so to speak. I see that many who have replied do not behave in this matter so you may feel insulted or simply I'm not being clear.


I'd go with the latter. Honestly, I can't blame other submissives for "going on the attack". There are a lot of jerks out there who use BDSM as a guise. I'd imagine it helps weed them out.

quote:


I'm fairly flexible with the needs of anyone that chooses me. I know what I look for in a sub and/or slave. I personally keep it simple as I can. Let me know if this helps anyone understand the post better.


Sorta but not really. What you consider going on the attack I might consider blunt honesty.




CdnExplorer -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 7:46:14 PM)

Without having more detail, I'd say that those subs had figured out what it is that puts them in submissive headspace and likely also had trust issues. Some people are wired to really submit to someone at the drop of a hat. I'm not one of them, and though I've been accused behind my back of not being submissive, that couldn't be further from the truth. It just takes me a while to really open up to someone, and let them in enough to take control. If I had known you for less than a month I'd have a lot of conditions on my submission too.

Also that's not all just not knowing you either, that would also be because you don't know me as well. There are some things that a lot of sub guys seem to love doing that would really hurt me were I forced into doing them. Until the reasons for that are really understood, I wouldn't entirely trust you to not take me to those places. That being said I'm pretty far from the type to say "Do X, Y and Z". But, it could very well be that these subs you're talking about just take more time than most.




ShaktiWithLingam -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 7:51:02 PM)

Despite the disrespect the subs/slaves have given me I'm trying to respect their privacy and identity. Right now I'm trying to paraphrase their profiles and replies. One stated " I will not submit unless you relocate to me." Another one said I will wait for him after his devorse from his wife... hmmm. I said no. Another told me I was to pay for his ticket for relocation, becuase as he put it is "the prime rib of slaves."  




liminalRapture -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 7:55:47 PM)

I had a "Dom" tell me he made millions in Nigeria and I needed to give him my bank account, mother's maiden name and credit card numbers to transfer millions to my account.  I said no.  But I'm a bossy submissive ;)

It is the internet.  Fraud happens.  All the time.  Ignore them.




laurell3 -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:04:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Despite the disrespect the subs/slaves have given me I'm trying to respect their privacy and identity. Right now I'm trying to paraphrase their profiles and replies. One stated " I will not submit unless you relocate to me." Another one said I will wait for him after his devorse from his wife... hmmm. I said no. Another told me I was to pay for his ticket for relocation, becuase as he put it is "the prime rib of slaves."  


uh....TROLLS and scammers are not "many subs" ..................... I actually assumed you were talking about subs......................




Missokyst -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:04:44 PM)

Perhaps they are not as DOM as they think they are?  I have met more than a few so called dominants who want to be dominant,  but lack the stuff it takes.  No.. let me clarify that.  They CAN dominate subs who fit their style.  Those dominants need the easier road rather than a challenging path.
Maybe the subs you have met didn't view you as a dominant.
I know it makes a difference for me when I meet people.  I begin thinking of everyone on an equal level as myself.  Then it separates into catagories. 
Those I feel respect toward and find myself in deference to.
Those who are buddies and people like myself
Those that have a mask of dominance, but beneath the mask is all bluster.
Those that will eventually ask me to top them.

It is all in perception.
Kyst
quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam
There are others whom may enjoy their submissive nature, but clearly Dom the Dom. Not only myself but many others have faced this issue on many levels.




AquaticSub -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:13:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Despite the disrespect the subs/slaves have given me I'm trying to respect their privacy and identity. Right now I'm trying to paraphrase their profiles and replies. One stated " I will not submit unless you relocate to me." Another one said I will wait for him after his devorse from his wife... hmmm. I said no. Another told me I was to pay for his ticket for relocation, becuase as he put it is "the prime rib of slaves."  


The statement "I will not submit unless you relocate to me" makes perfect sense to me. They aren't interested in a long-distence or online relationship. Either be in their area or be willing to relocate to them. That doesn't strike me as dominating at all, just setting the conditions under which they will enter a d/s relationship.

The divorce thing I just don't know enough details about. If you were talking to him and seriously considering entering into a relationship with him, I actually respect him for wanting to wait until the divorce. Either way though, they aren't dominanting the relationship because you aren't in one.

While the prime rib thing is smartass, I can understand wanting a dominant to pay for the costs of relocation. After all, you are uprooting your entire life to move to someone else! Particularly if they aren't moving in with you, you could at least help defray the moving costs. I don't think he went about it in the best way, but the idea behind it is understandable. Also, I still wouldn't consider it dominating the relationship because you aren't in one with them.

Edited because I misread. Sorry.




Jeffff -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:13:36 PM)





oops




ShaktiWithLingam -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:39:55 PM)

Well thats the thing I'm trying to say. I had not expressed any interest. They came to me out of the blue. These reply where either the first or second message sent to me. I had not expressed interest in them at all. They approached me without even an introduction. I was baffled that they were replies/demands when I had no clue who they were. These kind of messages happen fairly often. 




TethersEnd -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:44:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

The statement wasn't meant as a challenge. I wasn't making a blanket statement. If it cam across that way sorry for the misunderstanding. There are many types of personalities. The few I'm asking about is to further understand  the frustration of submissives whom may feel abused, threatened or simply feel anger or need excessive control of a D/s or O/s relationship. If  you feel I have not made myself clear let me know. I take a mothering, teacher, provost approach to my own submissives. Again if I have not made myself clear let me know.



Actually you were clear because I read between the lines. 
But line reading isnt always an option, it is quite similar to mind reading. 
Now that I've read father along in this post and you have begun to say what you really meant to say,
I would like to respond a bit more. 
I honestly believe that the misunderstanding you have encountered here is very similar to what it is your complaining about.  You have read words that appear to be demanding.  As other have pointed out what works for one isnt going to work for the next, which of course makes finding one you can find that click with something special. 
Sure common courtesy necessary, but that comes with interaction, not a profile. 
With all due respect, I would suggest an exchange of thoughts long before you label. 





AquaticSub -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:44:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Well thats the thing I'm trying to say. I had not expressed any interest. They came to me out of the blue. These reply where either the first or second message sent to me. I had not expressed interest in them at all. They approached me without even an introduction. I was baffled that they were replies/demands when I had no clue who they were. These kind of messages happen fairly often. 


Either they were wankers or they were just trying to get all that out first so that nothing comes up unexpectedly.




ShaktiWithLingam -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:46:23 PM)

Bless you a million times over, LOL, you said what I couldn't say. I think I was so confused with all the different request and approaches that trying to be fair about just made my words come out wrong. Thanks for such a wonderful reply!




ShaktiWithLingam -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 8:57:06 PM)

What I've learned in this post. I should ask those subs again why they placed demands with their first reply with out getting to know me first. I shouldn't ask subs whom haven't replied to me in such away to help me figure out an answer to a question I clearly can not express in writing. I'm glad everyone did put effort, thought, intuition and reason in response. Thanks to everyone for such wonderful in put. I hope this gave others food for thought also. Happy Holidays everyone.




ShaktiWithLingam -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 9:00:26 PM)

Thank you, well said.




juliaoceania -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 11:08:07 PM)

quote:

My quandary is: Why are many submissives so dominant and demanding?


Being demanding is not a "dominant" trait.

quote:

What is your personal experience with anger in "the Lifestyle"?


He will not top me when he is angry, and I do not enjoy making him angry

quote:

Most seem to enjoy "topping from the bottom" yet calling themselves submissive and/or slaves


please define.

quote:

Many also place a laundry list of conditions that don't give much room for creativity or personal growth. 


That would be just a personal opinion you have about submissives that do not suit you, it does not mean that someone else will not come along and that same submissive with all those conditions would be perfect for the right person.

I am also perplexed by what you mean by "growth", do you think that growth is about BDSM play or being in a power exchange dynamic? Because growth comes to us in all sorts of different ways, and these ways are all valid




beeble -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/6/2007 11:48:07 PM)

quote:

AquaticSub wrote: You know, reading that I remembered every time I've heard a man wish there was a manual for women...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Woman-Practical-Womens-Health-Manuals/dp/1844251829/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1197013645&sr=8-1




CdnExplorer -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/7/2007 3:51:02 AM)

Thanks...I do try! [:)]




stella41b -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/7/2007 4:05:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

The fact that many want to be owned, controlled and/or lead fits my personality.

My quandary is: Why are many submissives so dominant and demanding?



Do you see the conflicting statements here? This might be the problem. A skilled submissive would pick up on something like this immediately and start qualifying you. Nobody wants to submit to a Dominant who's not sure of who they are, what they want and expect and who they are looking for.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

I have a very different view of subs/slaves than most Dom/mes and Owners I know.



I see nothing wrong with this, but quite frankly any Dominant can say this about themselves. It's important to make sure that your 'difference' isn't a lack of awareness of how both dominant and submissive roles develop.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Most seem to enjoy "topping from the bottom" yet calling themselves submissive and/or slaves. Many also place a laundry list of conditions that don't give much room for creativity or personal growth.



I'm assuming here that you're talking about the very start of the relationship. This isn't them 'topping from the bottom' as you claim, in fact I'd be more inclined to suggest it's you not being aware of the actual process of submission.

If you're a Dominant who's expecting total and unquestionable control of a submissive slave then maybe it's time to wake up and smell the coffee because this isn't ever going to happen, and if it does, then the submissive or slave who's offering you such obedience and submission isn't worth having. BOTH of you have control of the relationship.. the submissive has global control, you as the Dominant are about to take the immediate control.

You see, BDSM is like a dance, it's just like a game of chess, and nobody here wants to be with a woodpusher.

If you've ever learned something about chess you know something about moves, strategies, and openings - the Ruy Lopez opening, the Sicilian Defense, the Scottish Defense, and so on. A D/s or BDSM relationship is no different. The basic principle is the same - you're the Dominant, therefore you play with black pieces, the submissive or slave is always the one with the white pieces. Who moves first in the game of chess? White. Who makes the first moves in a D/s or BDSM relationship? Why it's the submissive or slave.

The principle is exactly the same. You can't go for check or checkmate until some of the pieces have been moved by either side. So too you cannot assume the dominant role or take over control until both of you have made moves in that direction.

The submissive or slave at the start of a relationship is active and dominant just as the skilled Dominant is submissive and passive. I'm very active and dominant at the start of a relationship because I want to know who I'm submitting to, and I want to know EVERYTHING there is to know about that person. I need to know IF I am able to submit to that Dominant on their terms and to give them what they want from the relationship. I'm doing my 'needs analysis' and gathering information through dialogue and communication in order to be able to put together an offer of submission. This is my strategy, personal to me. You're the Dominant, you just sit back and enjoy the prospect of what's coming to you.

Only don't start dictating to me, or try taking over control, because I'll just lose interest and walk away. I'm not 'topping from the bottom', because as yet there's not D/s, no BDSM, you're not my Dominant, I'm still not your submissive, so how can I be 'topping from the bottom'? I'm just gathering information about you and what you expect from our relationship, therefore I'd suggest I'm more 'bottoming from the top'. I'm well aware that you're the Dominant one, I have a brain, I'm not stupid, and I'm assuming that you're going to be open with me and give me the time to get through this process.

It's just like the chess game. I'm making the moves, you're responding. Only unlike in the real game of chess I'm not playing to win, and so I'm keeping my pawn formation and taking care not to take your rooks or knights. I just want to have you move all your pieces all over the board for me, and each time you make a move I'm watching you like a hawk. As the chess player sizes up an opponent, I'm sizing you up as a Dominant. The skilled Dominant here would also be careful to keep their pawn formation and not take any of my pieces.

Be patient. Your time is coming. Only whilst you're waiting, I hope you're also listening to my 'laundry list of conditions'. These aren't actually conditions, well they are.. they're instructions for you, guidance notes, as you see, being the submissive I am I come with my own manual, instructions and these conditions are there to help you and guide you through my process of submission. At this stage I'm not interested in 'creativity' or 'personal growth'. There's no point. The relationship might fall flat on its face in a month or two, which doesn't leave much opportunity anyway for creativity or personal growth.

Are you ready? Sitting comfortably? Now comes my offer of submission within the range of submission you require. Here we're equal, it's negotiation, but not quite, because you're expected to win here. Unlike the game of chess I'm placing my Queen in a vulnerable position. Are you smart enough to take my Queen? I'm not going to place it in a diagonal position to either your Queen or bishops.

You see, I don't see my submission as a gift, it's a prize, a reward, and you being the Dominant have to show that you are able to win it. It's not there for the taking.. you've got to work it out and think it through for yourself. You don't have to do anything spectacular. I've never asked a Dominant to eat fire, swallow swords, time lions or even juggle their balls. Very few Dominants can juggle balls anyway, and this includes male Dominants who have their own balls. Can you fulfill your own needs, requirements and wishes from our relationship and fulfill mine too at the same time? Can you see your own pieces and know how to take the Queen?

If you can, take the Queen. If you can, accept the offer of submission. This is where you become your own dominant self and start to assume control as I, the submissive or slave, hand over control gradually through my process of submission, and therefore you gain control gradually. Meanwhile back at the chessboard, you make the moves and take it all the way to checkmate.

Only I'm useless at chess, so please don't ask me for advice or chess lessons. But hopefully something here might help you with your own strategies as a Dominant in this other game people call BDSM.

I wish you well.




CdnExplorer -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/7/2007 4:28:54 AM)

I like your chess analogy! It just fits so well. We let a dominant in pretty far past our walls, to a part of us that is really vulnerable. You can't let just anyone in there though, so you open just a little bit and watch their reaction.




arayofsunshine55 -> RE: Dominant and conditional sub/slaves? (12/7/2007 5:50:08 AM)

What baffles you about weirdos on line?  I get loads of emails which just get deleted.  Trying to understand those who are not compatible seems kinda useless to me.  And most will IMO not be compatible.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiWithLingam

Well thats the thing I'm trying to say. I had not expressed any interest. They came to me out of the blue. These reply where either the first or second message sent to me. I had not expressed interest in them at all. They approached me without even an introduction. I was baffled that they were replies/demands when I had no clue who they were. These kind of messages happen fairly often. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875