MasterHypnotist
Posts: 120
Joined: 6/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: subtlesilver sorry but with all the above" (sadistic practices) "you know how to control them and within limits can predict outcomes i am a qualified hypnotherapist and would really really ask amatuers not to dabble you can't know what you will happen and you may not be able to undo the damage subtlesilver, Who wants amatuers to dabble in anything? Ask emergency room personnel what they pull out of people's rectums because amateur sadists or curious individuals were trying to do something without being proficient at it, yet. I guarrandamnteeya that you don't want to be the first person I use a whip on! I'll sling lingo with ya, abreactions happen. (Abreactions are not bad, by the way, they're either carthartic or a construct for protection.) Manipulation happens. No one has said they don't. Hypnotism (used for good or weal) can only work with what is already there, nothing more. The one thing that hypnotism does not do, in and of itself, is create psychological problems. If a subject does not buy into the program, they will not enable it to work. If the subject is given suggestion contrary to their belief system, being hypnotized will not make them mindlessly follow the suggestion. (The assumption being, we are dealing solely with hypnotism, and not using it as an adjunct to Pavlovian conditioning, sleep, food or sensory deprivation, coercion, torture, compromising the system with pharmeceuticals or alcohol, etc.) Also, don't confuse, "Being made to do something you would not normally do," with, "Doing something you regret, later." If hypnosis were mind control, 100% of My smoking clients would be tobacco free after the first session! Hell, My pet smokes, even though she knows it displeases Me. Why? Because even though she has willingly received layers upon layers of dynamic hypnotic conditioning in a myriad of modalities to be tobacco free, the secondary gains of her real life outweigh her desire to improve her health and please Me in our relationship. Hypnotism doesn't scare Me. The whole BDSM scene scares Me. People willingly pay (or don't pay ;-) ) to have done to them what would be prosecuted under the Geneva Convention if it were done to a prisoner of war! A lot of Ds/ here might be able to get employment with secret police from around the world! This is the only thing that I'll purposefully repeat from a previous post. Most sadistic practices focus control outside the subject. The person tieing the knots, securing the bonds flicking the leather, controlling the rheostat, etc is responsible for the safety of the subject, with the subject having a fallback responsibility of using a "safe word." Even then, both parties are probably, at one time or another, jacked with the idea of testing, or going beyond previously perceived limits. With hypnotism, while it is nice when that responsibility can be safely shared, the primary responsibility for safety lies with the subject, while the secondary responsibility lies with the hypnotist. I would much rather find myself wanting to get out of hypnosis, (because being in hypnosis is a cooperative experience) than find myself wanting to get myself out of suspension, breath play, electrical play, etc. In other words, as with anything in this lifestyle, the submissive must live with the consequences of their consent. It's nice when the Dominant is there to support them afterward, but that's another risk the submissive takes. All the best, MH
|