perverseangelic
Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004 From: Davis, Ca Status: offline
|
While I dislike weird capping procedures in general, I'm ok with people who want to use the conventions for themselves. I'm cool with I/i speak though I don't personally like it. What bugs me is the concious choice to uncap a submissive person's name. I can tell when someone just doesn't use caps. There aren't any, obiviously. I get irritated when it's obvious someone took the time to make sure not to capitolize my name (proper name, obviously, as my handle is non-capped) while capitolizing either their name or their name and pronouns. I got a letter from someone, I replied and signed it with my name. They replied and addressed it to "samanth" while the rest of the letter was accuratly capped. I asked that they cap my name. Petty, I know, but a pet peeve of mine, also the preference of my partner (Though it's hard to believe here, I have a problem being assertive and his requiring me to be addressed in standard english has helped my assertiveness) The individual replied that I clearly had no submissive nature and that my partner was pussy whipped. Block. I know, it's petty, but it bugs me. Too, I'm of the belief that a dominant person should respect another dominant persons' wishes in respect to his/her property. Should my parnter prefer I address all dominant people as Sir/Ma'am I would hope that other's would be ok with that, as long as I explained why I was doing it.
_____________________________
~in the begining it is always dark~
|