floorkitten
Posts: 50
Joined: 4/28/2005 Status: offline
|
Master and I welcome selective submissives, at just about any level, into an environment in which they can experience a very structured household and 24/7 M/s relationship. Some day, we hope to come across that one that will not just want to add - but want to belong to Master's home. Recently, while conversing with a lovely young lady - the conversation continuously circled back to "control in play". As the point, our opinion was made, that "play" is not the forefront of a M/s household and the definitive of self desire, service, behavior and structure was expanded upon - the following comment or question was made towards Sir.... ".....but, I thought Dominants were suppose to build submissives up?" This lead me, actually both of us - to ponder the meaning behind this assumption. Nothing was ever mentioned, nor does Sir belittle, destroy, tear-down submissives, yet in the same breath - submission and/or being a slave is not a low level position for those who have lost all faith in themselves. It takes much strength to dedicate your life to another. To truly accept that you will serve and do, no matter what "you" would rather be doing. Is it me, or has the thought process on this lifestyle changed drastically since it has become the tourist attraction for any kinky adult desiring to "spice up" their sex life? I know my thoughts are coming in from two angles in this post and guess my bottom line question is... what are your thoughts on the statement regarding "....but, I thought Dominants...." floorkitten
|